Well, my view on it is that if somebody riles you enough to ban them, I'm pretty happy they probably deserve it. Your not exactly Weaste in the banning stakes, you actually use reason and intellect to guide your decisions!
I wouldn't be surprised if he really got his account hacked. He looks like a real computer illiterate.
Well he says he hasn't posted any pictures of him since he was in the Newbs. Someone else did, and from what he has told me, it sounds like someone has got into his account..
The images posted were from his IP address.
damning evidence there, looks like tony won't be back.
it wasnt the images that were the problem, it was the PM that was sent following it.
it wasnt the images that were the problem, it was the PM that was sent following it.
No he never said he didnt put the photos on, just that he only did once, and not again after the warning.
Having never seen this thread in question, I have no real idea what is going on, but I doubt its him who would have sent an abusive PM..
"Well he says he hasn't posted any pictures of him since he was in the Newbs."
I think the only way to solve this once and for all is to ban muller as well.
Well, my view on it is that if somebody riles you enough to ban them, I'm pretty happy they probably deserve it. Your not exactly Weaste in the banning stakes, you actually use reason and intellect to guide your decisions!
Weasstie was/is OK - with his cojones then things would have been better on the caff sooner than later
Abusing children in europe, like your kind self, Elvis.
Didn't he get banned/infracted for that?
He's still posting, so....
Infractions are worthless.
The problem generally lies with people being allowed to get away with things such as:
Which is clearly against the rules, and is a 5 day outright ban for me. Said person who posted that will then see that he can get away with such behaviour and up his boldness over time. The admins would like to point out that they are not Nazis and do not ban people for lighthearted crap (the Nazi analogy is in itself highly offensive and bannable IMO), but the truth of the matter is something inbetween not wanting to be Nazis and also not being able to cope with the workload required to monitor this website.
On the one hand they want the newbie forum because it creates too much disturbance (read work) if it was not there. But then lackies are appointed to oversee it because nobody has the time (read having to do some work) to look after it.
It was my idea to appoint moderators, but then they half arsed that as well.
Forums are very simple things, and I do not understand why the majority of admins here do not understand that. If you want mayhem, then it's very easy to achieve. If you want order, maybe even some seriousness in the football forums especially, then a whip needs to be hung on the wall in the mod room to lash out at people. It's all bollocks this treating people nicely and they will behave themselves, it doesn't work like that, it's an internet forum not a school for special needs children. A few bad apples amongst the 1000 decent posters can feck up the forum pretty quickly, but "oh, he didn't mean it, oh, go chat to him and tell him not to do it again". How about, do it again and you're gone, or not even bother, just gone without the chat.
come one admins, i really miss tony, he has made a lasting impression on me. let him back in.
i endorse this because he said he wouldn't ban me if he was still a mod.
The problem generally lies with people being allowed to get away with things such as:
Which is clearly against the rules, and is a 5 day outright ban for me. Said person who posted that will then see that he can get away with such behaviour and up his boldness over time. The admins would like to point out that they are not Nazis and do not ban people for lighthearted crap (the Nazi analogy is in itself highly offensive and bannable IMO), but the truth of the matter is something inbetween not wanting to be Nazis and also not being able to cope with the workload required to monitor this website.
On the one hand they want the newbie forum because it creates too much disturbance (read work) if it was not there. But then lackies are appointed to oversee it because nobody has the time (read having to do some work) to look after it.
It was my idea to appoint moderators, but then they half arsed that as well.
Forums are very simple things, and I do not understand why the majority of admins here do not understand that. If you want mayhem, then it's very easy to achieve. If you want order, maybe even some seriousness in the football forums especially, then a whip needs to be hung on the wall in the mod room to lash out at people. It's all bollocks this treating people nicely and they will behave themselves, it doesn't work like that, it's an internet forum not a school for special needs children. A few bad apples amongst the 1000 decent posters can feck up the forum pretty quickly, but "oh, he didn't mean it, oh, go chat to him and tell him not to do it again". How about, do it again and you're gone, or not even bother, just gone without the chat.
He'd ban me!
To be fair, although not quite as hardline, I concur with Weastes method of moderating. But as I see it, Sultan has done exactly what Weaste would have here. Just with less showmanship and baldness
Thanks rimaldo nice to be greeted back & also we have a lot of kiss & making to dogood to see you back tony. how i have missed you.