Has political correctness actually gone mad?
- Thread starter Pogue Mahone
- Start date
That South Park episode with Randy playing wheel of fortune was quite far ahead of its time.
was going through very old bookmarks and found this
I prefer calling them squatters and tramps but there you go.
Or better yet, the dwelling-divergent.
Or better yet, the dwelling-divergent.
"Unhoused" is so bad.
Anything that can make us feel better about our shitty societies.
So now I'm housed? Feels almost as good as based.
I like the comments who can't figure out that it's a skit and are getting angry.
In the spirit of this thread and also of getting older, I'm going to blame kids these days who do not understand any humour not involving animated toilets and tide pods.
Why is houseless good, unhoused bad?
This seems mad to me
https://www.theguardian.com/film/20...ses-restaurant-worker-jonathan-ross-interview
Emily Blunt has apologised for referring to a restaurant worker as “enormous” on a chatshow that aired 11 years ago.
In a resurfaced clip from an episode of The Jonathan Ross Show first broadcast on ITV in September 2012, the star of the summer blockbuster Oppenheimer said a waitress who served her at a Chili’s restaurant in Louisiana was “enormous”.
Emily Blunt apologises for describing restaurant worker as ‘enormous’
Oppenheimer star says she is ‘appalled’ by her remarks in 2012 interview with Jonathan Ross
An edited clip of the exchange appeared on TikTok and X this week, with several online commentators accusing Blunt of being “fatphobic”.
Blunt addressed the controversy in a statement to People magazine, in which she said her “jaw was on the floor” watching the clip. “I was appalled that I would say something so insensitive, hurtful, and unrelated to whatever story I was trying to tell on a talkshow.”
It happened more than a decade ago. Are we gonna force Fergie to apologise for calling R9 fat that one time?
https://www.theguardian.com/film/20...ses-restaurant-worker-jonathan-ross-interview
Emily Blunt has apologised for referring to a restaurant worker as “enormous” on a chatshow that aired 11 years ago.
In a resurfaced clip from an episode of The Jonathan Ross Show first broadcast on ITV in September 2012, the star of the summer blockbuster Oppenheimer said a waitress who served her at a Chili’s restaurant in Louisiana was “enormous”.
Emily Blunt apologises for describing restaurant worker as ‘enormous’
Oppenheimer star says she is ‘appalled’ by her remarks in 2012 interview with Jonathan Ross
An edited clip of the exchange appeared on TikTok and X this week, with several online commentators accusing Blunt of being “fatphobic”.
Blunt addressed the controversy in a statement to People magazine, in which she said her “jaw was on the floor” watching the clip. “I was appalled that I would say something so insensitive, hurtful, and unrelated to whatever story I was trying to tell on a talkshow.”
It happened more than a decade ago. Are we gonna force Fergie to apologise for calling R9 fat that one time?
Fergie did apologise shortly after
Damn, Emily's blunt.
I'm surprised you're surprised at this. It's been established for ages now that the internet has no statute of limitations. Anything you ever say anywhere that can be uploaded online and used against you is fair game for online trolls.
Is it a big deal though? Not referring to this specifically, because it seems a fairly harmless comment, but I think it's fair to ask public figures about past remarks, even 10 year old ones. If they say "yeah it was insensitive, sorry" then we move on. If they double down, we get to know they still hold questionable views and we can adjust how we spend our money based on that.
I'm surprised nobody has tried to cancel Mike Myers for the fat bastard character
It's not a big deal, no. Although I do think it's pathetic that anyone would spend any time trawling through decades old content looking for their "gotcha" moment. Get a life.
It does sound like a bit of a depressing existence, yeah.
I don't really get why she would owe any kind of apology here? The comment paints her as not the nicest person but, really, that's about it.
This one is going around a bit recently. Bloke has been doing piano videos at St Pancras for years. A group of British-Chinese?* people in the video don't like being filmed and tell him they don't want it shared or posted anywhere, he tells them we aren't in communist China now and it's a free country...British-Chinese? person says it's become racist now and cue police involvement.
*Not sure what nationality they are as they say British/Chinese in video at different times and might also be part of other groups.
Reading some Reddit comments about this(So could be bollocks)and it’s all a bit of a mess.
Both the piano player and the Chinese group are right and wrong. Apparently you can film with iPhones in public spaces(As long you aren’t harassing anyone which is a high bar to reach)but you need to get permission if making a commercial content. This guy is massive YouTuber who is making commercial content but using a iPhone.
So yeah it’s all very strange. Although the answer is people shouldn’t be arseholes. The group of Chinese people should have said they weren’t comfortable with getting filmed and the piano guy should have agreed(without saying all the bigoted commie stuff) to stop filming until the group have moved on. Plus hitting the keys so hard is really fecking up that piano.
Although it resulted in one of my favourite pics of 2024
Well I think if he's making commercial content he probably should have a way to blur their faces before uploading it if someone requests it, even out of common courtesy.
However, I saw him being interviewed and he pointed out their issue wasn't a personal one. They were filming an ad/commercial of some kind themselves and were filming him, which you can see in the video. They had some kind of disclaimer stating nobody could film them in the station and that seems to be the piece of paper the first lady has and what she was saying initially. I'm not sure how legal that document is or that is even possible to enforce such a thing in a public place like that.
I am losing sympathy for him though after seeing him bang on about virtue signalling etc when he went on Piers Morgan.
That pretty much summed up my thoughts too.
That was great entertainment. Maybe the guy was a bit defensive but it probably comes with the territory of filming in a public space as I can't imagine it's the first time he's had aggro. Could be why he's on first name terms with the rozzers.
To the Chinese people's credit, I'm not sure they did anything wrong except the total weirdo who went off on a tangent about the fella touching his missus.
To the Chinese people's credit, I'm not sure they did anything wrong except the total weirdo who went off on a tangent about the fella touching his missus.
At the end of the day, they were all in a massive train station, so why do they need to stand right beside a guy who is clearly a) playing the piano and b) filming himself? Just walk away. No need to confront him. Piano guy obviously couldn't move. This doesn't mean he isn't a twat, mind you.
The PC movement is a dead-end problem. It has reached his height, it can't grow much more than it is right now. That's why it's now walking backwards and try to expand their views into things that already happened.
But what it really lacks is empathy and sensitivity to understand that cultural values of a society change through the years. The past has already happened, no matter how much censure you will try to apply to it. This was what fascist and communist regimes used to do, and doing the same is being an hypocrite.
But what it really lacks is empathy and sensitivity to understand that cultural values of a society change through the years. The past has already happened, no matter how much censure you will try to apply to it. This was what fascist and communist regimes used to do, and doing the same is being an hypocrite.
Yes it has. I got given the middle finger by some special needs kid who was next to me in the car yesterday.
Would be interesting to know how legitimate that disclaimer paper was. Seem very strange.
I had no idea about this. Although predictable he would go gone down this route. It’s a very daily mail outrage story.
Surely the legal ramifications are a bit more complex than freeze peach, this is a free country and all those totally unsuspicious soundbites, and the Chinese group were being probably a bit too precious, but I'd be extremely uncomfortable fully siding with that monumental twat. He made me feel as if it would be easier to discuss anything with David Brent than with him.
Jesus Christ. Imagine filming that and posting it. The fella is an absolute thundercnut of the highest order. Prick.
"arrested on what charge? Filming the Chinese? Filming the succulent Chinese people?"
the "DON'T TOUCH HER!!!" guy deserves a good slap
So, everyone got their coverage.... publicity stunt par excellence, everyone got mentioned in dispatches
I watched the stream the day (or 1 day later) it happened. I'm not buying that those people were filming anything there. They didn't want evidence of them being there that day going around on the internet, for whatever reason, and went about it in the worst possible way.
Which is fair enough tbh. The only mystery is why they didn’t just walk away from the person they knew was filming something to go on the internet. Such an odd decision to try and make him stop filming.
That’s what I thought too.
But, bottom line, he’s a nuclear level throbber. Disaster of a human and a raging bigot.
He was asked very politely to not use any content of them. He caused a scene and uploaded the whole thing to the internet.
Also… sunglasses on inside when it’s -4. Prick.