Seems like a massive overreach from yourself. Calling a spade a spade, to the positive and negative is what this club and the fanbase struggle to do. We've been in doldrums so long, there's a very skewed perception of what doing well or poorly is. To only extract the poor, or condemn ever more is not objective reasoning and whilst you're entitled to not be objective, it defeats the purpose of a performance thread, the very definition of real time assessment, to be perpetually damning of any player.
Airing thoughts that he mightn't be good enough, period, would be for another part of the forum because it pays no mind to what is happening in real time where he is performing well enough to be singled out for praise or at least acknowledgement.
Incidentally, both things can be true and run in parallel: he mightn't be good enough ultimately and at the same time be playing well. It just comes across as sour or agenda driven to give him no credit at a time when the majority of our players have been atrocities whilst Maguire has not. He was singled out for criticism last season and the one before for his horrendous blunders and there's no reason not to single him out and state he's playing well now.
And surely the time to assess whether this is flash in the pan or solely because of the level of opposition is after the data comes in against a number of stronger teams - like in the upcoming run of games?
Maguire's nerves seemed to be absolutely shot to pieces and with that, he didn't even look like a United CB, but as he is now, the determination is whether he can be a starter in our strongest lineups, or if he is only fit to be a rotation option. As opposed to before, he definitely serves a purpose at this moment in time and has shown he belongs in one capacity or another; previously he did enough to earn himself a one way ticket out the door. Redemption arcs are real, to what extent Maguire's can go to remains to be seen, but summarily dismissing him just isn't what this thread is about.