This Håland ?The only CF in world football you would put before Kane is Haland ?
This Håland ?The only CF in world football you would put before Kane is Haland ?
No DM is worth 100mil, especially one that's still learning the new role.
I love Martial but would have Kane as our CF. He adds that target man threat on top of anything Martial offers. If we didn’t have other areas to strengthen I would like to see us try and get his signature. But as things stand, our priorities should lie elsewhere.
Kane doesn't offer what .Martial does. He doesn't have Martials pace nor dribbling or flexibility to claim that he'll add target man and what Martial offers.I love Martial but would have Kane as our CF. He adds that target man threat on top of anything Martial offers. If we didn’t have other areas to strengthen I would like to see us try and get his signature. But as things stand, our priorities should lie elsewhere.
Fans really have a short memory. Under Mourinho you would laugh at me if I said Martial is as good as Kane. Now the same manager is managing the latter. Kane isn’t slow by any stretch of the imagination. In Arsenal game alone he ran entire length of the pitch with Son only to not receive the ball. He’s also being asked to play in front of 8 defenders on the counter which would take its toll on any forward. Spurs had 37% of possession in the game for your info. His issues are 90% tactical.Kane doesn't offer what .Martial does. He doesn't have Martials pace nor dribbling or flexibility to claim that he'll add target man and what Martial offers.
The man could hardly move past the hour mark in the Arsenal game and you think he'll replace Martials pace, skills and other things
I'm not saying Kane is snail slow but compared to Martial he's slow. He doesn't have Martial's pace. Ole himself recently has said that his front 3 is currently working perfectly because they all have pace, skills, technicality and finishing, Ole's words not mine.Fans really have a short memory. Under Mourinho you would laugh at me if I said Martial is as good as Kane. Now the same manager is managing the latter. Kane isn’t slow by any stretch of the imagination. In Arsenal game alone he ran entire length of the pitch with Son only to not receive the ball. He’s also being asked to play in front of 8 defenders on the counter which would take its toll on any forward. Spurs had 37% of possession in the game for your info. His issues are 90% tactical.
There’s a stat in this thread about him having lesser touches than Shaw in opposition penalty area. Not long ago our strikers were posting similar stats. Kane will probably move to Madrid soon and be back to his usual class within a few months.
One thing that annoys me is that he never passes the ball when one of his teammates is in a better position to score (classic example, WC semi v Croatia when sterling had an open net).
I know he's a striker and they're meant to be greedy etc but open your eyes man!!! Today he was almost at Stevie M v Chelsea selfish levels
No DM is worth 100mil, especially one that's still learning the new role.
This Håland ?
He was 1 on 1 with the keeper at least 2 times from what I remember.His performance yesterday was horrible: poor first touch, a lot of misplaced passes, poor offball movements, and his finishing was shocking.
He really did over try. Not the Kane who's instinctive game made him so dangerous. He even tried a ridiculous curler when players were in better positions. Arsenal went on a counter just after. If they'd equalised, I wonder if Jose would have thrown him under a bus?His performance yesterday was horrible: poor first touch, a lot of misplaced passes, poor offball movements, and his finishing was shocking.
He really did over try. Not the Kane who's instinctive game made him so dangerous. He even tried a ridiculous curler when players were in better positions. Arsenal went on a counter just after. If they'd equalised, I wonder if Jose would have thrown him under a bus?
His confidence looks shot.
He was 1 on 1 with the keeper at least 2 times from what I remember.
The bad performance was on Kane.
Thank you very much, you can keep him.
Not good enough for Utd some of you lot say. Don't make me laugh.
This is his 6th season in a row when he has scored over 20 goals in all competitions. A club record.
Pretty sure no one has said that. He sentiment is is is not worth us spending £200m for various reasons.
Not good enough for Utd some of you lot say. Don't make me laugh.
This is his 6th season in a row when he has scored over 20 goals in all competitions. A club record.
Freakishly insane superb achievement.
He's absolutely fantastic, but we already have a very good striker in Martial. Given our other needs, I think it'd be silly to go after Kane.
Not good enough for Utd some of you lot say. Don't make me laugh.
This is his 6th season in a row when he has scored over 20 goals in all competitions. A club record.
Brilliant player and the peak is yet to come. Jose is not probably the best manager for him though. Put him in the City lineup and you will get Ronaldo numbers from him.
Please for the love of God no! Absolutely don’t want him.
If we aren’t spending 120m on Sancho, we would be stupid to blow a similar figure on him.
Agreed. He’s either at his peak or just past it. Great goal scorer for spurs but he carries different types of problems to your build up like we had with Lukaku. Good touch and close control but would absolutely require a change of footballing style to accommodate him. If we go for him, we might as well have kept Lukaku and just fire loads of crosses into him instead.No chance of this at all!
Plays nothing like Lukaku and is actually useful dropping deep. Plays already with Rashford, Sterling and Sancho for england and they seem to be copingAgreed. He’s either at his peak or just past it. Great goal scorer for spurs but he carries different types of problems to your build up like we had with Lukaku. Good touch and close control but would absolutely require a change of footballing style to accommodate him. If we go for him, we might as well have kept Lukaku and just fire loads of crosses into him instead.
Agreed. He’s either at his peak or just past it. Great goal scorer for spurs but he carries different types of problems to your build up like we had with Lukaku. Good touch and close control but would absolutely require a change of footballing style to accommodate him. If we go for him, we might as well have kept Lukaku and just fire loads of crosses into him instead.