Jaybomb
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2016
- Messages
- 4,459
Wouldn’t want him here. I’m a massive fan of Lukaku and want him to succeed at United.
No thank you
Last thing I want is United inquiring about Verratti and PSG triggers Pogba’s buyout clause
£200m for the best striker in the world? Worth it.
Thirded.Can't believe I'm saying this but worth it. Best striker in the world.
We already have Lukaku so I don’t think we need H.Kane atm.We should go head to head against Real again. Whatever they offer we can offer more. Maybe offer Blind and Darmian to sweeten the deal for Spurs.
He has one? How much?
No thank you
Last thing I want is United inquiring about Verratti and PSG triggers Pogba’s buyout clause
He has one? How much?
Levy wouldn't even sell us a virus so no point even trying to start negotiations with him. If we are to waste time chasing unrealistic targets then I'd rather prefer it being someone like Verratti.
This could be a start to Spurs losing all their key players. If Chelsea lose Hazard, I could see them going in for Deli Alli. With them two gone, Eriksen could possibly leave as well if Juve or Bayern come calling. Eriksen could fit in at United but don't see us doing any business with Levy.
Wouldn’t want him here. I’m a massive fan of Lukaku and want him to succeed at United.
Wouldn’t want him here. I’m a massive fan of Lukaku and want him to succeed at United.
Personally I don't see how any club can turn down 200m for a player. If they bid that sum its bye bye to HK. Interested to hear what @GlastonSpur thinks on a 200m for one player?
Spurs should take the money
I think Levy and Florentino get along after all. I think if Levy is resounding and clear in the beginning, saying that they do not sell, -by the new stadium + having the flagship player - there will be no soap opera in the summer.
However, I do not think that Levy will make Florentino look bad, making him negotiate until the end of August and then saying no.
About the player, I do not know if he is so loyal to endure that kind of offer. Not every day a club offers 200 million pounds for you.
Do not you think United could offer 200 too?
Why? We don't need it. The club is profitable and our income will soon sky-rocket.
Or if the argument is that, with £200m to spend, we could improve the team (even without Kane) beyond where it is now, then the same argument must be applied to RM in reverse: i.e. that they could improve their team more by spending £200m on 2 or 3 players rather than signing Kane.
But it's all academic anyhow, because Spurs won't take the money even if offered it.
Money transfer was made on 3rd August, exchange rate that date was 0.90386 (XE.com). That would surely be £200,656,920.£198m
Kane is worth far more to Spurs than £200m - because of his value on the pitch to the team and also because of various potential commercial deals to do with the new stadium which dwarf that sum.
Kane to RM this summer is total non-starter and simply won't happen - for the reasons given above and several more besides ... but I'm sure that won't stop various posters on here claiming otherwise.
Why? We don't need it. The club is profitable and our income will soon sky-rocket.
Or if the argument is that, with £200m to spend, we could improve the team (even without Kane) beyond where it is now, then the same argument must be applied to RM in reverse: i.e. that they could improve their team more by spending £200m on 2 or 3 players rather than signing Kane.
But it's all academic anyhow, because Spurs won't take the money even if offered it.
I could easily see Bale used as part of the deal to bring Kane to Bernabeu. This could appease the Spurs fans and Levy would possibly do well with 120m + Bale.
What? That's even worse than 200m.
Kane is worth far more to Spurs than £200m - because of his value on the pitch to the team and also because of various potential commercial deals to do with the new stadium which dwarf that sum.
Kane to RM this summer is total non-starter and simply won't happen - for the reasons given above and several more besides ... but I'm sure that won't stop various posters on here claiming otherwise.
What departure? The whole Marca BS is just par for the course for them - it's about the 3rd or 4th time already that they've claimed a 'done deal', or 'Bale in secret talks' or some such nonsense. It's all just hysteria and pure invention designed to keep the punters excited and advertisers happy ... don't you get this yet?
Bale to RM (or anywhere else) just isn't going to happen this summer.
£100m + Coentrao might swing it ... provided we get all of the money and the player now, but Bale only leaves for RM next summer. Plus everyone at Marca has to be sacked and Ronaldo has to give up his shirt number for Bale.
Ah, I know the problem. Papers/websites had done the conversion the day before the 3rd and just stuck with the £198m figure after despite the exchange rate increasing to take it over £200m. You're right - the Neymar deal would have been over £200M.Money transfer was made on 3rd August, exchange rate that date was 0.90386 (XE.com). That would surely be £200,656,920.
£200 is a bit cheap for Kane in my opinion.
£200m for the best striker in the world? Worth it.
Can't believe I'm saying this but worth it. Best striker in the world.
Kane is worth far more to Spurs than £200m - because of his value on the pitch to the team and also because of various potential commercial deals to do with the new stadium which dwarf that sum.
Kane to RM this summer is total non-starter and simply won't happen - for the reasons given above and several more besides ... but I'm sure that won't stop various posters on here claiming otherwise.
Why? We don't need it. The club is profitable and our income will soon sky-rocket.
Or if the argument is that, with £200m to spend, we could improve the team (even without Kane) beyond where it is now, then the same argument must be applied to RM in reverse: i.e. that they could improve their team more by spending £200m on 2 or 3 players rather than signing Kane.
But it's all academic anyhow, because Spurs won't take the money even if offered it.
He has one? How much?
Yep. In Spain for example it’s common practice. Sergi Roberto springs to mind. The most recent example...Premier League players don't have buy out clauses. They are not legally binding.