Harry Kane | "I will be staying at Tottenham this summer and will be 100% focused on helping the team achieve success."

Escobar said:
They advanced into a CL final, things were positive. So I guess he felt the team will challenge for trophies
Click to expand...
Possibly - I mean I dont think a raiola or similar high profile agent would have let him sign something on sentiment without a mechanism to get out but I believe his brother is his agent so who knows
https://ck66.co.uk/

I dont think any other leading player has ever signed up and trusted them with negotiations
 
I'd entertain a straight swap for Lingard, Martial, Pereira, Jones and Romero. That's half a team for one player.

Throw in a loan player too. They were fortunate to loan Frasier Campbell when we signed Berba. I'm sure a similar type loan will be of huge interest for Spurs.
 
Samid said:
I'd entertain a straight swap for Lingard, Martial, Pereira, Jones and Romero. That's half a team for one player.

Throw in a loan player too. They were fortunate to loan Frasier Campbell when we signed Berba. I'm sure a similar type loan will be of huge interest for Spurs.
Click to expand...

Why on earth would Spurs want all those wages and deadwood?

They may consider Lingard and Martial but no club in their right mind would take the others. (No disrespect to Romero but Spurs don't need him)
 
Samid said:
I'd entertain a straight swap for Lingard, Martial, Pereira, Jones and Romero. That's half a team for one player.

Throw in a loan player too. They were fortunate to loan Frasier Campbell when we signed Berba. I'm sure a similar type loan will be of huge interest for Spurs.
Click to expand...

They can have Mata, Matic Chong and Dalot too.

Deal of the century.
 
Why would kane leave a club that fighting for top 4 and join another club that also been fighting for top 4, tarnishing his legacy along the way. He will be ridiculed joining us to do the same. We don't stand a chance at this. City it will be
 
Quite ironic that people here seem to think he will stop scoring once he hits 30 but they are adamant 35yr old Cavani is capable of helping us win the league leading the line next season.

Of course we should to be in for Harry Kane! Every top team should be if they can afford him. A player like Kane doesn’t grow on trees. How many players in the league have scored 20+ goals a season consistently for as long as Kane has? Aguero is the only one that comes to mind. Plus every time I watch him he works his socks off for the team and he will be desperate for a silverware at this stage of his career.

I know we have other pressing positions in the team but there is no reason we can’t sign Kane and another midfielder or even a RW especially when you consider the amount of deadwood we (should) will ship off.

There is every chance that this signing will be the title decider next season. If City or Chelsea beat us to his signature, there is very little we can do to change our our fortunes, unfort
 
Nevilles.Wear.Prada said:
Why would kane leave a club that fighting for top 4 and join another club that also been fighting for top 4, tarnishing his legacy along the way. He will be ridiculed joining us to do the same. We don't stand a chance at this. City it will be
Click to expand...

Neither Man United nor Spurs are really "fighting for top 4". It's a pipe-dream for Spurs and Man United are a very comfortable 2nd.

Spurs to Man United is a step up in every possible way.
 
duffer said:
Neither Man United nor Spurs are really "fighting for top 4". It's a pipe-dream for Spurs and Man United are a very comfortable 2nd.

Spurs to Man United is a step up in every possible way.
Click to expand...

Baffling Utd fans need to be told this, such a self loathing bunch at times. One thing saying you can see why Kane would prefer City over us right now, but its obvious we're a step up from Spurs.
 
Judas said:
Baffling Utd fans need to be told this, such a self loathing bunch at times. One thing saying you can see why Kane would prefer City over us right now, but its obvious we're a step up from Spurs.
Click to expand...

it’s a pathetic attitude. I’m sick of seeing and hearing these pathetic, fragile and self-loathing cretins.

they are the same people who can’t enjoy when we win, constantly criticising everything about the club - if you didn’t know where we were in the league you would think he had been mid table for the past decade.
 
Would be slightly surprised if City goes for him. I think he'll have a Rooney-esque decline rather quickly. They'd be better off signing Haaland. So would everybody IMO.
 
Nevilles.Wear.Prada said:
Why would kane leave a club that fighting for top 4 and join another club that also been fighting for top 4, tarnishing his legacy along the way. He will be ridiculed joining us to do the same. We don't stand a chance at this. City it will be
Click to expand...

There is a big difference actually.

Spurs haven't won a trophy in a very long time, we are still winning trophies.

Spurs challenged for 2/3 seasons doesn't mean they are in the same boat as United.

United are a bigger club, bigger fan base, better chance of winning trophies and players understand and appreciate that.
 
Imagine being one of the best strikers in the world at 25 years old and deciding to sign a 6 year contract with no release clause at Tottenham fecking hotspur. What a muppet.
 
Nevilles.Wear.Prada said:
Why would kane leave a club that fighting for top 4 and join another club that also been fighting for top 4, tarnishing his legacy along the way. He will be ridiculed joining us to do the same. We don't stand a chance at this. City it will be
Click to expand...

Although i firmly believe that Ole and United will challenge for the title next season, from Kane's perspective of wanting to win the league he'll join the team who've won 3 of the past 4 titles and potentially will be European champions.
 
VorZakone said:
Would be slightly surprised if City goes for him. I think he'll have a Rooney-esque decline rather quickly. They'd be better off signing Haaland. So would everybody IMO.
Click to expand...
Rooney was playing top level football at 16, whereas Kane was on loan in the Championship at 20/21. Moreover, Kane has never looked particularly out of shape or been known for drinking a lot or eating unhealthily.
 
horsechoker said:
Rooney was playing top level football at 16, whereas Kane was on loan in the Championship at 20/21. Moreover, Kane has never looked particularly out of shape or been known for drinking a lot or eating unhealthily.
Click to expand...
He doesn’t have much pace either.

The biggest difference is hunger. By 27 Rooney had won everything, he had been part of great teams. Kane hasn’t had that.
 
horsechoker said:
Rooney was playing top level football at 16, whereas Kane was on loan in the Championship at 20/21. Moreover, Kane has never looked particularly out of shape or been known for drinking a lot or eating unhealthily.
Click to expand...

He has had 6 long injuries in his career though. That takes it toll. Especially the ankle ones.
 
We've got too many holes to spunk our transfer budget on one player. Really would love to see Kane at United but it's not happening.

Makes far too much sense for City to get him, they'll be 10+ points ahead by Christmas with him while the others scramble for 2nd. Kane gets his dream of winning trophies and he'll surge towards Shearer's record.
 
He's one of the few world class strikers in the game, he has premier League experience performing at the highest level. We have to at least try to sign him.

He turns all those draws in January when we where top of the table into wins. If we get 4 years out of him then it's worth it as we'll be in title contention every year we have him. As he winds down in his 30s we'll then have a greenwood coming into his prime who's learned from both Cavani and Kane.

People are saying we don't need him, we have.....

When we where the best in Europe we had Cole, Yorke, Teddy and Ole then we had Rooney, Ronaldo, Teves and added berbatov. You can't have too many top strikers. Kane is the best in the world in his position.
 
He’s not moving to Liverpool. If we had that kind of money we’d probably try for Sancho or Haaland. I’d love Kane here but of all the clubs who won’t be able to pay levy what he wants, we’d be right near the top.
 
Castia said:
Would it be the worst piece of business if Spurs sell Kane (140m) and bring in possibly Grealish (80m) and Lukaku? (85m)

Grealish Lukaku Son

Is a very good front 3.
Click to expand...
Why would Lukaku go to Spurs?
Why would Grealish go to Spurs?

Spurs would be a very unattractive club to join without Kane and they don’t offer high wages either so neither player would get a pay increase.
 
for him to go public like that he's obviously been tapped up and promised a transfer. 100% city unfortunately, ticks every box.
 
Few of my non-Utd supporting mates seem to think we'll be all over this but I'm not so sure.

Under Moyes, LvG and Jose I think we would have been flinging bucket-loads of cash about, hoping to make a 'statement' signing, but I like to think the club have learnt from that.

Sure, before anybody says otherwise, Kane is a fantastic player and would 100% improve our XI...so on that basis it's very tempting. However, we have to look at the big picture...Kane is 28 and he is becoming increasingly injury-prone. He would probably cost our entire Summer budget plus a portion of next years' budget. He would also likely want a 5YR contract on 400K+ per week.

I really don't think this is likely to happen and I don't really believe we are seriously interested at the touted prices. If we're ever going to compete with City we need to be smarter than just throwing cash at our problems because City will always beat us at that game. We need to be smart!
 
Nevilles.Wear.Prada said:
Why would kane leave a club that fighting for top 4 and join another club that also been fighting for top 4, tarnishing his legacy along the way. He will be ridiculed joining us to do the same. We don't stand a chance at this. City it will be
Click to expand...
At least we found GlastonSpur's 2nd account.
 
STaphouse said:
Why would Lukaku go to Spurs?
Why would Grealish go to Spurs?

Spurs would be a very unattractive club to join without Kane and they don’t offer high wages either so neither player would get a pay increase.
Click to expand...

Lukaku wouldn’t surprise me.

if he thinks he’s got something to prove in the PL (which he of course has), he’s not going to one of the top clubs - despite the media inexplicably linking him to City. Spurs is about right.

Grealish isint going to spurs. He’s similar to Kane in signing a stupid contract that really limits his choices.
 
Lentwood said:
Few of my non-Utd supporting mates seem to think we'll be all over this but I'm not so sure.

Under Moyes, LvG and Jose I think we would have been flinging bucket-loads of cash about, hoping to make a 'statement' signing, but I like to think the club have learnt from that.

Sure, before anybody says otherwise, Kane is a fantastic player and would 100% improve our XI...so on that basis it's very tempting. However, we have to look at the big picture...Kane is 28 and he is becoming increasingly injury-prone. He would probably cost our entire Summer budget plus a portion of next years' budget. He would also likely want a 5YR contract on 400K+ per week.

I really don't think this is likely to happen and I don't really believe we are seriously interested at the touted prices. If we're ever going to compete with City we need to be smarter than just throwing cash at our problems because City will always beat us at that game. We need to be smart!
Click to expand...

personally I don’t think he will be demanding outrageous wages.

any move will pay him more than he’s currently on - and given his likely fee, he’s going to need to be realistic with his wage demands.
 
Going to City in my opinion. Sadly they will absolutely batter everyone next season.
 
Neil_Buchanan said:
Imagine being one of the best strikers in the world at 25 years old and deciding to sign a 6 year contract with no release clause at Tottenham fecking hotspur. What a muppet.
Click to expand...

Any real muppet would have insisted on a one way optional sell-on buy-back clause for a swap deal to a third party agent for a world record sign on fee. Those are the true ways og the muppet.
 
I'm actually hoping City are invested in the Messi or Haaland idea, but Kane would be his perfect striker I feel, his build up play this season has be a joy to watch but i would love him here.
 
slored1 said:
Going to City in my opinion. Sadly they will absolutely batter everyone next season.
Click to expand...

People said this when Utd added Veron and RvN to the treble-winning team...we won one of the next five titles.

For two and a half years, Liverpool barely lost a football match. Now they are limping into a top four battle going into the last game.
 
Lentwood said:
People said this when Utd added Veron and RvN to the treble-winning team...we won one of the next five titles.

For two and a half years, Liverpool barely lost a football match. Now they are limping into a top four battle going into the last game.
Click to expand...
Kane is better than both. Top 5 player in the World and perfectly fits the system at City. He will bang in 45 goals next season.
 
slored1 said:
Kane is better than both. Top 5 player in the World and perfectly fits the system at City. He will bang in 45 goals next season.
Click to expand...
:lol: in what world is Kane better than Ruud? Ruud has won more than Kane ever will and performed at the absolute top, whilst having bigger injuries.
 
Lash said:
:lol: in what world is Kane better than Ruud? Ruud has won more than Kane ever will and performed at the absolute top, whilst having bigger injuries.
Click to expand...
Anderson has won more than Gerrard, does that mean he is looked back upon as a better player? Rvp was truly incredible but its not a bad shout to think Kane will go down as one of the greatest PL strikers in history along with him, or higher if he breaks the all time record.
 
Lash said:
:lol: in what world is Kane better than Ruud? Ruud has won more than Kane ever will and performed at the absolute top, whilst having bigger injuries.
Click to expand...
So you would rather take Cleverley than Gerrard as he won more League titles? Kane has much more to his game than Ruud - it is telling that we won the title in 2006/07 when RVN was chucked off. An amazing goalscorer but Kane gives you so much more than just goals.
 
Lash said:
:lol: in what world is Kane better than Ruud? Ruud has won more than Kane ever will and performed at the absolute top, whilst having bigger injuries.
Click to expand...

wouldn’t be sure about that. RVN didn’t win a great deal with us, and Kane has the potential to break Shearer’s record.

trophies don’t mean anything in terms of how good a player actually is. Clearly there is a correlation on the aggregate - but it’s not a requirement.

Lets compare David May to most other footballers who have played the professional game!

love RVN, but if Kane goes to a big club and plays well for the next 3-4 years any wins things, then he will universally be seen as a better player.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.