dinostar77
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2014
- Messages
- 8,845
No utd players buy houses in manchester period. Dont they all live in cheshire?Bullshitting. Nobody in their right mind buys a house in Manchester without having a signed contract.
No utd players buy houses in manchester period. Dont they all live in cheshire?Bullshitting. Nobody in their right mind buys a house in Manchester without having a signed contract.
We're not Dortmund. Why would we need to sell Kane at any point?
It's pretty amusing, and the epitome of 'modern fans' that they see Harry Kane - a player who by no means relies upon pace as one of his attributes, is seen as basically washed up already at 27
He'll be kicking around in his 30's easily at this level
Pogba will be a starter if fit, regardless (of anything really). In what position is another questionST: Cavani, Martial, Greenwood
RW: Sancho, Greenwood, James, Amad
LW: Rashford, Pogba, Martial, James
AM: Bruno, Pogba
There is no way Tottenham will sell Kane for a price any club can afford. Not even City would spend £130-140 million on him - on top of £300.000 a week. That is spending well over £200 million on a player whose sell-on value will drop dramatically for each year. That's the problem with being 28 in todays market.
I wonder if Kane would have the guts to ask for a transfer. He only signed a long contract last summer and Spurs chairman is a tough nut. I see Kane not having the strength of character to demand a move.
thought the contract was a couple of years ago at least. Poch was definitely there at the time.
So the Athletic are saying United have tabs on Kane and Haaland but due to Cavani resigning it won't be until next summer most likely. Also said the funds needed to buy a new striker would probably be the whole summers budget for the players they're looking at.
I think Kane's just a bit dim and naive to be honest. For some reason he trusted Levy and then Tottenham signed no one, and told the world Kane wanted to stay because he wanted to play in the new Spurs stadium, and then sacked Pochettino. He won't push for a transfer because he probably thinks they'll get top 4 next year.It was 2018, so he’s midway through it now as it ends in 2024. I do find it odd that top players sign such long contracts without any form of exit strategy (assuming that is the case here - and I haven’t heard any suggestion that he was a way out). Their careers are short and there is always the risk of a club, particularly one at Spurs’ level, entering a rebuilding phase. I can’t see him moving this summer as the fee will be huge. That might work well for us though - one more year of Cavani and then maybe able to get Kane next summer.
If we could sell Martial next summer we could land 2/3 of them.Yep next summer will be the one where the strikers move, Kane's making it known now he wants out but he'll give Spurs one more year for them to turn it around (which they won't), Haaland will move due to his release clause and Lewandowski will move as he'll only have a year left on his contract and be at an age where Bayern will be wanting a replacement
It was 2018, so he’s midway through it now as it ends in 2024. I do find it odd that top players sign such long contracts without any form of exit strategy (assuming that is the case here - and I haven’t heard any suggestion that he was a way out). Their careers are short and there is always the risk of a club, particularly one at Spurs’ level, entering a rebuilding phase. I can’t see him moving this summer as the fee will be huge. That might work well for us though - one more year of Cavani and then maybe able to get Kane next summer.
I think Kane's just a bit dim and naive to be honest. For some reason he trusted Levy and then Tottenham signed no one, and told the world Kane wanted to stay because he wanted to play in the new Spurs stadium, and then sacked Pochettino. He won't push for a transfer because he probably thinks they'll get top 4 next year.
How long is left on his deal?
Yeah forget about it. We'll sign him on a free when he's 32 haha3 years and Levy to deal with equals near mission impossible
Of course not. Very likely City can't spend more than 50-60M on a striker this summer.There is no way Tottenham will sell Kane for a price any club can afford. Not even City would spend £130-140 million on him - on top of £300.000 a week. That is spending well over £200 million on a player whose sell-on value will drop dramatically for each year. That's the problem with being 28 in todays market.
There is no way Tottenham will sell Kane for a price any club can afford. Not even City would spend £130-140 million on him - on top of £300.000 a week. That is spending well over £200 million on a player whose sell-on value will drop dramatically for each year. That's the problem with being 28 in todays market.
If City want him, and he's open to it, I just see it as a foregone conclusion really.
Just hope we can wrap up Sancho very quickly at least.If City want him, and he's open to it, I just see it as a foregone conclusion really.