He’s 27 for Christ sake. That’s literally when most strikers hit their peak. If you look around almost all the best/prolific strikers today are 32+ years old. Why do people make it seem like 30 is retirement age for footballers??
We already have those.
Well we’ve got Rashford who could do it, but nobody on the right. I just think Kane would slow us down too much, we already look fairly toothless if forced to play in front of a stacked defence - the last thing we need is to lose that threat in behind.
Hopefully we sign a right winger so he isn’t wasted out there.
You are conveniently forgetting Ndombele, there? It's like omitting Bruno in our line-up and claiming that Cavani is banging goals in on the serves from Fred. Come on , now.
He’s injuryprone like a 30 year old already ffs. Do you really think he’ll be less injuryprone in two seasons when he’s 30? Think again then.
Hard to think that a striker who's scored at least 20+ goals a season over the last 7 years since he broke out would be considered underrated but it feels like he's just that on the cafe
No clue on the fee but he's the type of player that would absolutely put us over the top in terms of genuinely contending for top honors I feel like. Drop him into this current squad and I truly believe he'd have the impact of a RVN and RVP on our fortunes.
? Goals per game he has the best ratio (along with Henry) in PL History.Yeah I see Kane as a luxury signing for clubs with endless amount of cash. When fit and in form - probably the top three 9’s in the world. But that spell is usually 15 games a season due to injuries. How many clubs will sanction that kind of deal? PSG and City.
Are we talking about the same Harry Kane, who scored a ton of goals under a manager as prosaic as Mourinho, in a team known to lack creativity from midfield, just this season?
Wow great input to the discussion. You should get a medal.
Nobody's forgetting Ndombele, Spurs' creative maestro with a whopping 4 assists all season in all comps.
His injury proneness gets overstated like crazy on here, he hasn't played less than 34 matches since he's been a starter and hasn't scored less than 24 goals (during that 34 game season) which would be our best goal return from a Unuted forward since RVP.
It's really not like he's always on the operating table and misses most of the season and even when he does miss time he still puts up outstanding goal returns.
I understand the clamor for someone younger like Haaland but the dismissiveness towards one of the best strikers the league has ever seen is crazy to me
Fergie himself would've jumped through hoops to sign him if he were managing during Kane's career
, nonsense.Injuryprone, reached his peak (which is great tbf), will only decline from here, will cost a fortune, probably 400k/week. I just hopes that my club dosent sign him. He’s a luxury player for clubs with endless amount of cash.
You don’t read my posts do you?
Those 3 play in easier leagues than the PL. That cannot be conviniently brushed aside
I agree. But my point still stands. I would much rather buy Haaland or Mbappé for £100m than Kane for £100m for obvious reasons that I mentioned earlier.
Harry Kane has played 119 games over the last three seasons and scored 79 goals. Anyone that could afford the fee would buy him.
