The gap between that Utd team and Chelsea team wasn't that big for me. And we had Rooney, Ronaldo, Rio, Scholes etc and of course Fergie.
The gap between us and City is huge. Kane and Grealish don't make it smaller.
But it is what it is. The PL have welcomed in this foreign money. Now we have to deal with the consequences
Really?
I remember feeling a little bit helpless in front of that Chelsea side. I remember getting giddy at the tail end of 2005-06 and thinking we could do it, even with Giggs and O'Shea in midfield, only to get spanked 3-1 at Chelsea with Rooney breaking his foot. That first Mourinho team was pretty imperious. Them going 2-0 up was game over.
When we lost Ruud in the summer of 2006 and all the crap happened with Ronaldo and the wink, I was far from optimistic. Scholesy had been out for ages with his eye. I'd be lying if I said I knew his return would be so massive for the side. Plus we had replaced Roy Keane, who'd been everything for us, with this lad from Spurs called Carrick. Didn't know too much about him, to be honest, but again I would be lying if I said I thought Carrick was going to get us to Chelsea's level.
What a season 2006-07 was, eh?
I'm not sure, relatively speaking, that the gap between today's City and 2006's Chelsea is that different.
As for Kane I'm not sure Spurs will actually let him go, not if City refuse to meet his asking price. Like Dortmund with Sancho, financially, yes, they'd be better off selling with three years left on the deal but they'll still get good money with two years left. Kane's value won't start to really nosedive until next summer. If Levy forces Kane to stay one more season he still won't lose
that much value. Its not like its £100m this year or a bag of crisps and a pack of cigarettes next summer.
Ultimately this will all come down to how badly City want Kane. Its pretty much exactly the same as us with Sancho. We could've got Sancho last summer but we decided the need wasn't so great that it'd be worth the extra £50m. So we waited a year and went back in at a price that was more to our liking. City can do the same. If they aren't willing to go to £120m this summer then they can go in for £80m next summer, when Kane has two years left on his deal, and get the player.