Cassidy
No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2013
- Messages
- 32,941
Just out of curiosity, how much older is Kane than Casemiro?
Just out of curiosity how many more trophies does Casemiro have than Kane?
Just out of curiosity, how much older is Kane than Casemiro?
How does this have any relation to ability?Just out of curiosity how many more trophies does Casemiro have than Kane?
Winning is not related to ability… right okHow does this have any relation to ability?
Football is a team game.Winning is not related to ability… right ok
But didn’t win it. If Kane was ambitious enough then he’d of left a few years ago when he was a bit younger. He knew he’d never win a trophy with spurs.Kane got to a CL final with Spurs & delle ali
And that team couldn't even win a league cup?Football is a team game.
I don't think he has pace. Of course he can find a space and with anticipation and timing he can beat a defender. That's the art of being a top 9. But I don't see pace and that means you are always going to need it to come from the wide players to ensure there is a balance. Not necessarily a problem with the likes of Rashford, but maybe a problem with some other attacking lineups we could field. The manager has used slowish players as a focal point anyway, I'm just saying it's a consideration of how he works with the likes of Sancho, Antony, Bruno.It’s just flat out wrong that Kane has “no pace at all”. Weghorst is an example of an outright slow player. He looks like he is running in treacle. Kane is clearly not fast, by premier league standards, but he has adequate pace to hold his own and rarely gets caught if he gets some space. If anything, he actually seems more mobile than ever currently.
Kane’s last three club managers have been Mourinho, Nuno and Conte - they are the very definition of negative managers. There is no way at all that Kane is the cause of Spurs looking defensive. He’s the absolute perfect option for a team with attacking intent given how brilliant he is at bringing others into play.
Shouldn’t have signed Van persie then. Stupid opinion.Winning is not related to ability… right ok
Ambition is something to admire, but so is loyalty. Kane has tried to take Spurs to the next level and amazingly almost did it with a relatively meh tottenham squad playing in a champion's league final. Freaking Dele Alli was probably their second best player, enough said. I admire players like Kane and Gerrard who try to take their squads to the next level all the while knowing that it would be a hell of lot easier just to win silverware by jumping ship to Madrid or Barca etc.But didn’t win it. If Kane was ambitious enough then he’d of left a few years ago when he was a bit younger. He knew he’d never win a trophy with spurs.
I think Van Persie is perfect analogy for why we should buy Kane. Van Persie was in his last few years of his prime and took our squad to the next level.Shouldn’t have signed Van persie then. Stupid opinion.
I think Van Persie is perfect analogy for why we should buy Kane. Van Persie was in his last few years of his prime and took our squad to the next level.
Ye that’s understandable. Staying loyal is good but there has to be a time when you understand for your career that you need to move on to win trophies. I suppose the Tottenham owner was Trying to make him stay by employing managers with a record of winning trophies… mourinho/conte. Hasn’t worked though.Ambition is something to admire, but so is loyalty. Kane has tried to take Spurs to the next level and amazingly almost did it with a relatively meh tottenham squad playing in a champion's league final. Freaking Dele Alli was probably their second best player, enough said. I admire players like Kane and Gerrard who try to take their squads to the next level all the while knowing that it would be a hell of lot easier just to win silverware by jumping ship to Madrid or Barca etc.
Just out of curiosity how many more trophies does Casemiro have than Kane?
For how long. 1 season. How much would Kane cost? To make his fee anything but madness would require 3+ years of elite output from him.
For how long. 1 season. How much would Kane cost? To make his fee anything but madness would require 3+ years of elite output from him.
But didn’t win it. If Kane was ambitious enough then he’d of left a few years ago when he was a bit younger. He knew he’d never win a trophy with spurs.
And Kane never bothered to leave for a team that could win more?
The "don't buy Kane he hasn't won anything" is the single worst argument against signing a player I've ever seen.
As already pointed out, neither had RVP.
Nor Dwight Yorke who was only 2 years younger than Kane when he signed for United.
Sheringham's trophy cabinet was hardly bursting at the seams either.
My ideal pick is Osimhem but Kane is world class, and guarantees you 30 goals +.
You really need to do some mental gymnastics to try and convince yourself it would be a bad signing.
And he gave us a single season…Van Persie was a whole different level of injury prone to Kane as well.
And he gave us a single season…
Because he was injury prone and also had an average manager after the good one retired.
Kane is not injury prone.
Anyway, Ten Hag has signed Casemiro, Eriksen, Sabitzer, Weghorst, Martinez who is 25 as well during his time here.
I honestly don’t think he cares much about age so ultimately it doesn’t matter what is fans think.
If ten Hag thinks Kane has the right technical ability, has the mentality to want to leave Spurs and win - then the age won’t really matter to our manager.
Let’s see.
Now we may get a potential young striker coming back to our squad - an old experienced one makes sense a bit too.
My point wasn't about his age...
I mentioned if he wanted to leave Spurs then he would then have the mentality of wanting to win.
If he doesn’t then he wouldn’t come and we wouldn’t get him anyway -
So it’s a win win.
I disagree with that part, if he had that mentality he would have left already, and he certainly wouldn't join United ahead of a Bayern, Madrid etc at this stage of Uniteds development and his age.
The "don't buy Kane he hasn't won anything" is the single worst argument against signing a player I've ever seen.
Kane got to a CL final with Spurs & delle ali
Ten hag doesnt seem to care about age.
yes, was about to say. Don't think he was the one who scored a hat-trick in a semi final from 2-0 down.They actually got to the final without him. They stuck him back in the team for the final and they stunk up the place.
He was clearly not fit for the final and it was a mistake to play him.They actually got to the final without him. They stuck him back in the team for the final and they stunk up the place.
They actually got to the final without him. They stuck him back in the team for the final and they stunk up the place.
Of course he doesn't. He's a head coach - and they understand they last about 3 years in the job. This is where the club needs to put its own long term interest before his.
Yes from Lucas’s final minute goal vs Dortmund.
Pochettino bought him back half injured in the final and they lost because it was a poor decision- doesn’t mean Kane did shit all in the CL that season. He scored 5 goals in 9 games.
Sorry are you trying to suggest that goals against Barcelona, Dortmund and PSV don't count because of 'context'? The acrobatics used by some in this thread to downplay Kane's ability is starting to become ridiculous.Context matters. 3 of those 5 goals were in the group stage against PSV. 1 was against Barcelona in a 4-2 loss and the other was in the second leg against Dortmund when they were already through to the next round
Sorry are you trying to suggest that goals against Barcelona, Dortmund and PSV don't count because of 'context'? The acrobatics used by some in this thread to downplay Kane's ability is starting to become ridiculous.
He was injured for part of it so that's obvious but you are suggesting that those goals don't matter as much which is just utter nonsense. His overall record in Europe is 45 goals in 74 appearances.Eh, I think he’s world class but I don’t think he contributed much to that UCL final run.
Yes he did score 5 in 9 but there's a caveat to that. For starters 4 of those goals came in the group stage. The other came in a dead rubber 2nd leg game against Dortmund after Spurs had beat them 3-0; a game in which Kane was absent through injury. Then Spurs played City in the QFs, winning 1-0 at home through a Son goal but unfortunately lost Kane to injury in the 2nd half. Kane didn't feature for the rest of the UCL campaign till the final. People bash him unfairly for the final as he was nowhere near match fit, but it's a myth that Kane led his team to the final. Tottenham got there despite him being absent.Pochettino bought him back half injured in the final and they lost because it was a poor decision- doesn’t mean Kane did shit all in the CL that season. He scored 5 goals in 9 games.
That is laughable if you honestly believe that. You don't think Kane wants to win top trophies? I've heard it all now. Sorry but some of you lot need to give your heads a wobble.I really like Kane as a player, would take him at United all day. However; like some have mentioned on here, there is a mentality issue with him.
Does he want to win the top trophies, he seems more interested in individual awards to me.
You want your strikers to deliver in big moments, unfortunately, Kane does not do that. Yes, in league games he has scored important goals, loads of goals for England too.
In the CL, he did not deliver in the semi and final because of injuries and being unfit, he was a ghost in the final.
For England, he done well when England were rebuilding in 2018 and there was no pressure, as soon as Euro 2020 and WC 22 came about and England had a bit more pressure, he was a ghost again. Big moments, Kane does not delivery.
This is why I question his mentality, we need players, in the big moments that will deliver for us.
That is laughable if you honestly believe that. You don't think Kane wants to win top trophies? I've heard it all now. Sorry but some of you lot need to give your heads a wobble.