This is true. But Haaland will probably move to real in a few seasons. Although, at the rate he scores he might still get the record.
Harry Kane | Bayern Munich player
- Thread starter LawCharltonBest
- Start date
Let's be honest here, a fruitful/successful short spell at Real Madrid would do infinitely more good for his legacy within the game worldwide than simply being PL top scorer. It's the reason why Rooney and Henry have greater legacies in the game than Shearer
The potential of possibly doing both has to be mouth-watering at this stage of his career after a trophy-starved prime
The potential of possibly doing both has to be mouth-watering at this stage of his career after a trophy-starved prime
Maybe, if they do get Kane I guess it depends on how long he stays there and if they go for Mbappe at some point too. Is there a clause in Haalands contract or something cause I can't imagine City will just let him go to Madrid when he wants
Jarrod Bowen has won more trophies then Kane.
West Ham breaking their trophy drought before Spurs may be the final straw 
Username checks out.
I’ve never got why it’s not just ‘top flight’ record
Apparently it’s like the worst source so wouldn’t dismiss this just yet
I think their response to Levy was "€115 million for a 30 year old player with 1 year left on his contract? Do you think we're f**king loco, hombre?!"
So we can add Antonio to the list of attackers that have more trophies than Kane....
He seriously needs to do something to force it, you can't be the premier league's all time top scorer without a single trophy, shit is embarrassing.
He seriously needs to do something to force it, you can't be the premier league's all time top scorer without a single trophy, shit is embarrassing.
If Levy doesn’t see the jeopardy in demanding insane fees for someone with only one year left, there’s really no point in even haggling with him. Just tap him up in January.
They gave Chelsea 160m for Hazard with a year left
Even 100 is too much. Closest to Benzema (tho I’d say it is still a downgrade) playing style, but it would be insane to spend that much for either Real or United.
Funnily enough both teams are desperate for a striker but there aren’t many options let alone great ones.
Or maybe both teams can make do 1 more season. United with Rashford, Real with Rodrygo?
Funnily enough both teams are desperate for a striker but there aren’t many options let alone great ones.
Or maybe both teams can make do 1 more season. United with Rashford, Real with Rodrygo?
I think you will be less desperate than we are. I'm sure Perez has his eyes on a potential Haaland deal down the line and no way will he ever join us. I think if we manage to complete the takeover in time and funds are made available we'll end up paying upwards of 100 mill.
Not that I think he's worth that btw....
West Ham should offer Spurs 100M for Kane after they’ve sold Rice, just for the windup….something something trophies
They gave Chelsea 160m for Hazard with a year left
Maybe they are loco!
No doubt they're good players stepping up , but you're talking about replacing a core spine that has won 5+ champions leagues. That experience is intangible and it will be a major accomplishment if they're able to come close to the big ears again. The league is a bit more within grasp but even then, if this year is any indication it won't be easy.
No one cares Harry
Even if he stays and breaks it, the record will be absolutely smashed by Haaland some time later.
Why do you hope he goes to Real when the only other top tier option is playing for a club even harder to negotiate with than Spurs. Unless of course you have some mad idea than we could get Neymar on loan
No point in waiting Erik once Real flutter their lashes at Kane we have no chance. So that bit about it being separate to signing Hojlund means feck all. We need to find an experienced striker to supplement him but it won't be Kane now. Just look how much noise is coming from the top Madrid sources to see that they have it in the bag.
Last edited:
I don't believe Kane is a target for United this summer...Its all just media bs. United need 3-4 signings and money is tight. Spending 100+ on Kane would leave absolutely nothing for a GK, MF, DF etc.
So from that point of view, I'm not saying I hope Kane joins Real instead of United, but I would like him to join a non-English team just to see how he gets on. Also it would give a big screw you to all the fans/media questioning his ambition.
Willing to wait until the end of window. I don’t believe that.
Hope Real, If really interested, definitely don’t let that happen.
I doubt EtH will be that daft though, he knows he can’t faff like the FDJ saga.
Hope Real, If really interested, definitely don’t let that happen.
I doubt EtH will be that daft though, he knows he can’t faff like the FDJ saga.
At an average of 30 goals a season, he’d need to be there for 9 seasons. Can’t see either of those things happening.
Firstly youre not considering that united is a buIness therfore you're perspective is about past footballing metrics which are great no doubt. However any transfer needs to be considered in a financial sense looking forward.
Kane is old in terms of a player and spending 100 million on an asset that might last two more good years is not good business. Especially when you may get him for free in a year
If 100 million guaranteed a title then yeah it's a no brainer but it certainly doesn't with the competition out there.
No way should United make a high bid.
It's just not financial sesne
Kane would be great at Utd, but only on a free transfer or for a relatively bargain price.
There’s no way we should be even contemplating paying anywhere near a £100m for a 30 yr old player with one year left on his contract.
Even £60m or £70m would be pushing the boat out and there’s no way Levy is going to sell at that price.
Utd and ETH should be looking elsewhere and moving fast to secure a couple of strikers, early on and not get into any late transfer panics.
Other clubs are moving fast in this summer’s window.
Take-over or not, if we’re not ready to get deals done in the first few weeks, when it’s been widely known that playing squad changes we’re going to be needed, then nothing has been learned from the chaotic club management of the last decade.
.
There’s no way we should be even contemplating paying anywhere near a £100m for a 30 yr old player with one year left on his contract.
Even £60m or £70m would be pushing the boat out and there’s no way Levy is going to sell at that price.
Utd and ETH should be looking elsewhere and moving fast to secure a couple of strikers, early on and not get into any late transfer panics.
Other clubs are moving fast in this summer’s window.
Take-over or not, if we’re not ready to get deals done in the first few weeks, when it’s been widely known that playing squad changes we’re going to be needed, then nothing has been learned from the chaotic club management of the last decade.
.
Last edited:
It isn't even the real record. It is just the Premier League record, but he isn't actually the all time top scoring player in the top English leagues.
Also, Shearer played and scored in the old Division one and he played in longer seasons, so it isn't even comparable to now. If you extrapolated Kane's goals against Shearer's games, he might have already beaten it, anyway.
It seems to be more fluff and media driven, in my opinion.
How are Madrid doing on FFP anyway?
The 'Levy fighting to keep him' is obviously bs imo. Kane has only one year left and Levy already threw any possibility of renewing after how he treated Kane last summer. He has to sell now or nothing next summer.
Imo Kane will go to Madrid for around 50m then in a couple years they'll replace him with Haaland.
Personally I'd like Kane to stay at Spurs for another year then we might have a chance to sign him next Jan. Levy simply won't let Kane go to us for anything less than 100m.
There's absolutely no way he leaves for only 50, it'll be 80 minimum in my opinion
I’d be down for getting him next year but top 4 is no guarantee next season. I’d go up to 90m this year but Kane has to help himself and tell Levy that he’s walking for free if he doesn’t move this summer.
Maybe but 80m for a 30 yo CF whose contract has only one year left sounds a bit too much anyway I think.
Imo it'll depend on how much Madrid value and think they'd need Kane. If they think Kane is a must for their campaign next year then they might pay the price you said. Or 50m upfront and 20-30m if they win the CL/Liga etc. For Levy he must sell now or nothing next summer. Madrid also have a very promising forward in Alvarez imo. Lad is only 18 yo but already 1.92m and quite good already. We'll see I think.
Kane wants Shearers record, no way he moves abroad in my opinion.
Unless he wants to stay in England, no way we are getting him. Nailed on starter at Real, Levy will (probably) be willing to sell abroad. Maybe Levy gets greedy and pushes them off but not an optimist.
I’d do that and soon, test Levy straight away and show Kane we mean business. Worst case we are flat out denied and Kane stays silent. At least we can crack on. This transfer window is so important and without a good one, I agree, top 4 is very far from certain next season.