Hargreaves

You must be on drugs for sure to come up with such drivvle <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
 
Who, and are you sure you're not on drugs, constantly?
 
I watched his interview on Canadian tv a few years ago in which he talked about how he and his dad were die-hard Bolton fans (his dad's from Bolton) and as a result, the club they hated the most was United.
 
Originally posted by Wibble:
<strong>Are you sure it wasn't a drug induced halucination? :rolleyes: </strong><hr></blockquote>

could've been apparently...
 
Originally posted by FlyingPasty:
<strong>

Well Chaddy wnats to leave so send him off and get Hargreaves, that way we have class cover for becks and could even try becks in the middle.</strong><hr></blockquote>

3-5-1-1
 
Originally posted by Gazza:
<strong>Hargreaves isnt creative, cant cross, and cant beat a player, not the type of player we need atm. </strong><hr></blockquote>

None of our midfield other than Giggs can beat a man, so that is the least of our concerns. Hargreaves is incredibly fast, and that along gets him out of situations where he would otherwise be in trouble. His skills are decent though, and if he got a little more self-discipline, and tried fewer Beckham long-balls, he would be better off. I'd get him if the price was right.
 
If the price is right then sure, but what price would that be? Any price above 12m would be far too much imo, esp. as a striker is our #1 prority.
 
Originally posted by Gazza:
<strong>Any price above 12m would be far too much imo, esp. as a striker is our #1 prority.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Agree. Let’s buy 2 strikers that we need (that’s my point) so we’ll discuss our midfield problem then.
 
Originally posted by Gazza:
<strong>If the price is right then sure, but what price would that be? Any price above 12m would be far too much imo, esp. as a striker is our #1 prority.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Where do you come up with 12m from?? That's ludicrous.