Ekeke
Full Member
Hargreaves might be a good option in midfield 5 though. When/if Fletcher stops playing better than him.
4 points:
1 As per usual, you ignore the even less defendable point Noods made about the chief's argument re the Bayern game.
I don't even remember the terrible things noodle is meant to have said. Only you do. I was making a point about an obvious incongruity in one of your childish rants, I'm not obliged to trawl through all of them.
2 Once again you ignore the fact that Noods posted the 'better than' remark as an explanation (and therefore presumably hyperbole free remark) regarding his point.
Yet again: the giant robot bit was the hyperbole
3 Effenberg v. Keane - you seem to be the only person so far (I raised the question earlier) to rate Effenberg (via the opinions of unsubstantiated others) as superior.
I don't. I reckon at their peaks there was nothing much between them. I said I was sure plenty of people do, such things being largely a matter of opinion and not, as you think, forensic analysis.
Congratulations. By your own notably stupid logic, you are now guilty of LYING, dishonesty and hypocrisy.
4 Noods continued to construct new misrepresentations of both what the chief and I posted - not consistent with honesty - especially when he purports to advance evidence in support of his case.
This is worth a separate remark before retiring for the night.
The mere fact that you don't realise that 'exaggerating what your opponent said in order to make it easier to attack' is massively different from 'exaggerating your own point for rhetorical effect' would suggest you are either much less intelligent than I reckoned - or being deliberately disingenuous.
One misrepresents the view of an opponent and casts the negative judgements upon him. The other should, when used correctly, invite the reader to judge whether the exaggeration is justified.
Take Nucks' remarks about Hargreaves - his remarks about passing are sound - what about his contention about runs past opponents? He may reckon this is open to debate - he may even reckon he is definitely right. The crucial point surely, is that by stretching the point in an argument he himself is making he is inviting negative judgement on himself.
Noods, by making what he maintains the chief said to be less believable, is inviting negative judgement against his opponent. That's one aspect of what makes it dishonest.
He was a clone because he shared most of the same characteristics - that I'd reckon was accurate.
The eventual debating points would be - to what degree? - and then, to what effect?
I think this is a fair assessment Chief. I would add though that when I've seen him play for United this season, he hasn't been particularly fast or mobile. I'm worried that whatever pace or mobility he did have has gone away after his injury. As I said in probably my only other serious post in this thread, it may be that with a full preseason behind him and a run of games he can become a more effective regular player for United. I don't know.He instead became a very down graded version of a Keane. With similar defensive ability and but little of the attacking skills the great Keane possessed. More akin to Keane in his decline. Only with much more speed & none of the attacking ability Keane possessed.
Actually, people have claimed much, much more, as I pointed out earlier to a similar remark (of course, all anti-OH posters will have read ALL their opponents' remarks as Noods demanded of me).
Let's see 'if you love football and love Owen Hargreaves you have a hole in your soul' - location of an anti-OH poster here.
Remarks about OH being 'anti-football' and 'pointless' in contexts which referred to his general function as a footballer 'at all'.
You may be right that 'No one has claimed to hate OH' but a number have indicated feelings that amount to that. It is true though, that even posters who don't really hate OH, manage to post the same type of shit as those who do.
I reckon a team like Newcastle or Spurs would be his ideal station.
I think he might have stopped...
Not even close
Inzaghi's so fecking limp, and pathetic... not to mention a spawny cnut
Not much to hate about Joe Cole, unless you're prejudiced against people with Down Syndrome
In tribute to Page 76, what this thread needs is a gay Owen Hargreaves lookalike in a hat with a feather in it...
Oh look! Introduced by Jason no less
Mongo make simple goal.
United is an ideal station for Hargreaves, just give him time
Oh I see. So when ever a team concedes a goal and Hargreaves is on pitch. It must be his fault. .
Mongo make simple goal.
Pele look like Ralphie Milne.
You sir, are intellectually dishonest and should be rooted out and spanked by Mike Phelan.
Er no. I was just saying that he was at fault for that particular goal. The one that knocked them out of Europe. In the game where he supposedly put in a performance that made Pele look like Ralphie Milne.
Prepare to be stalked across the forum by Feadingseagulls
In your world. Where insane people roam. Not on planet EarthEr no. I was just saying that he was at fault for that particular goal. The one that knocked them out of Europe. In the game where he supposedly put in a performance that made Pele look like Ralphie Milne.
dumboI picture Feeding Seagulls as a disgruntled academic whose work never reached the level that he wanted so he takes out his disappointment by using long words on an internet forum to sound pretentious.
Then again, I also picture Bazalini as Christopher Walken and think Devilish could well be Kevin Keegan in disguise, so you shouldn't read too much into that.
Hey, didn't Golden Blunder also say that a United player posts on these boards too?
Wait a minute....
The Chief....
Supports both United AND Bayern....
He's German yet speaks English....
Could it be? It all makes sense now....
THE CHIEF IS OWEN HARGREAVES!!!
I picture Feeding Seagulls as a disgruntled academic whose work never reached the level that he wanted so he takes out his disappointment by using long words on an internet forum to sound pretentious.
Then again, I also picture Bazalini as Christopher Walken and think Devilish could well be Kevin Keegan in disguise, so you shouldn't read too much into that.
Hey, didn't Golden Blunder also say that a United player posts on these boards too?
Wait a minute....
The Chief....
Supports both United AND Bayern....
He's German yet speaks English....
Could it be? It all makes sense now....
THE CHIEF IS OWEN HARGREAVES!!!
In your world. Where insane people roam. Not on planet Earth
PS - how are your man-boobs you seemed so keen to tell us all about?
You do so in almost ever post .That's why you came up with the fecking stupid notion that his only job is to stop us conceding goals. Deny that makes you the idiot
Hargreaves supports our attacks by keeping players like Scholes supplied with the ball constantly. By him winning it back and passing it to them. Then going further upfield to be an extra man outside the opponents box, to intercept clearances. That job doesn't need holy wood passes. Through balls or mazy runs with long shots, or amazing balls unless of course its a fecking computer game/console game. Where players can often impersonate Maradona when having the skills of Bramble.
Kinell, playing 5 yard passes to a teammate after winning the ball back isn't exactly a hard job job, anyone can do that, apart from, it seems, OH. Most of the time he dwells on the ball, running round for a while, before eventually deciding to pass, and even then it's a 50/50 chance that that pass will be any good. That may be his job, but at the moment, he's not doing it very well.
Actually, it's an 85/15 chance
Which compares favourably with:
Anderson, 80/20 chance
Mascherano 82/18
Makalele 82/18
Fabregas 78/22
Gerrard 75/25
http://telegraph.jumpmediagroup.com/PlayerStat.aspx?p1id=5127&p2id=3789
The whole "Hargreaves can't pass for shite" myth is one of many bizarre idiosyncracies of the caf.
His biggest flaw, when we're in possession, is a tendency to delay on the ball but I wonder if that might be due to him having only played 19 league games this season, with the team re-shuffled in almost every game he plays?
Or are we expecting him to be familiar the runs and movement of his new team-mates from the moment he signed for us?
Hmmmm...
Actually, it's an 85/15 chance
Which compares favourably with:
Anderson, 80/20 chance
Mascherano 82/18
Makalele 82/18
Fabregas 78/22
Gerrard 75/25
You can't compare the accuracy of Hargreaves' passing to that of Anderson/Ronaldo etc. I'm sure Anderson would have better stats if he always played a 5-yard horizontal ball.
If we're talking stats, how about someone digging up Carrick's tackling? Surprised the hell out of me.
Don't forget that the likes of Fabregas, Gerrard and Anderson try a lot of 'killer' balls, rather than just 5 yard passes to a teammate.
The fact that Hargreaves record is almost identical to Makelele and Mascherano , 2 players that often get criticised for their passing ability says it all really.
In your world. Where insane people roam. Not on planet Earth