That was idiotic to say the least and I apologise, it was deleted immeadiately.
Gun shots outside Parliament: Police shoot assailant following car attack on Westminster Bridge
- Thread starter Untied
- Start date
For all we know @langster that could be Common!
For Christ's sake, are we really going to go down this route? People pretending not to have made a speculatively judgement on account of how unbigoted they are as part of an attempt to seek external validation...it's bizarre.
That says alot about you. Why feel the need to disrespect someone with different beliefs? Absolutely childish.
Eh? What have I said or done, I haven't even posted in this thread. Only just got online.
Awful to see photographs of MP Tobias Ellwood dazed with despair and exhaustion. You did your best, Mr Ellwood; all credit to you, sir.
You need to start thinking before you push the post reply button.
Eh? What have I said or done, I haven't even posted in this thread. Only just got online.
Oops. @Carolina Red posted it, my bad.
But I think we disagree that Islam is unique in this refusal to compromise. It's like the Pope said the other day and I am paraphrasing here; "the concept of conquest is a cornerstone of religion". Religion has always encourages or at least did not have a big problem with the idea of conquering and converting others because "they" were the ones with the right message. I mean the Christian went all over the world doing pretty much the same thing for a very long time. Part of this is that religions came at a time when conquest in general was not the horrible thing it is considered today. It was entirely normal to go out, invade another place, take everything they had and submit them to the conqueror's law. This is why religions can seem indifferent to those things. Extremists choose to take this as a sign that it is encourages, non-extremists desperately point to it being not part of their belief. The problem is therefore, do we have an environment that encourages the rise of extremists? History tells us that being disenfranchised usually does create such environment and said extremists will never be short of material they can interpret in the worse way possible.
If that is your position, then don't say a bad word about anyone ever. That politician you think is a prick....please don't 'disrespect' him on account of his followers having a different opinion to you. Right?
how many are killed every year? There must be stats somewhere considering you think that it's a noble act in Islam to slaughter these people, the authorities would obviously keep a tally.
_(cropped).jpg)
There is a difference between what a politician is to me or you and what Muhammad is to a Muslim.
Aye fantastic from him, man deserves a lot of praise and all the recognition he gets, along with the authorities in general with their prompt and seemingly effective response.
Funnily enough, open apostasy and open homosexuality are extremely uncommon in countries that have made such acts punishable by death. Ask yourself honestly, what do you think would happen to you if you walked down the street in rural Pakistan or Saudi Arabia wearing a 'there is no God' t shirt and singing a song in the local language about bumming blokes. How many minutes do you think you would last?
Looks dodgy to me
The act is enough to make a decent speculative judgement, given recent history.
But you wouldn't do that, no-one in their right mind would. It's called being respectful of other cultures.
Ah sure, happens to the best of us.
Funnily enough, I have had the same beard and a lot of smiles from mature women.
Dammit Tim, you have a match to win this weekend!
If you're into logical fallacies, then sure.
They wrongly fingered that guy in jail as the perp, as did others.
He's brown, so that's proof enough for many.
That's precisely the point. He used the apparent lack of executions for homosexuality/apostasy in the Islamic world as an argument against my case that the Islamic word mandates violence towards these people. The obvious conclusion is that people have to conceal their homosexuality or apostasy on account of the fact that such things are illegal in most Muslim countries.
As do/have I
One of the better things about balding was realizing that bald with a nice beard is apparently attractive to the ladies
The west banning books would be against it's moral fabric. The idea of the Quran being a threat is also off the mark. For one it's not good Jihadi propoganda because while it encourages it, it's not focused on it. Oxbridge have a long history of studying Islam, banning the Quran wouldn't be seen as acceptable. For 2, it's not actually a very good book. It blatantly plagerises other sources to the extent it contradicts itself. It uses different languages because of it's plagerism. It repeats it's stories. It plagerises the incorrect Greek sciencific beliefs of the time.
Very few Muslims bother to read it in a language they understand. The ignorant brainwashed terrorists certainly don't, it's not catchy enough for them.
The attacker is just as likely to be a Mormon, right?
Probably more to do with his act, the car-ramming thing has been used now a number of times and been explicitly called for by the goons in Raqqa.
Is that the follow-up to 'Music to watch girls by'?
Are people really going to start arguing that being openly gay or openly committing apostasy in countries like Pakistan will not eventually lead to being the victim of violence or death?
I'm fecking out of here.
I'm fecking out of here.
Indeed. I wonder if a friendly mod had a quiet word?
You're still on the fallacies mate
As do/have I
One of the better things about balding was realizing that bald with a nice beard is apparently attractive to the ladies
It was a real surprise, a nice one.
We used to guess "Nutty" before we guessed ISIS when we heard those hooves.
For me;
Organised plan, carried out with intent by members of a group as part of a sustained attack against a nation or representative body = Terrorism.
One, or a few disparate people committing a crime that shocking = Criminal (Probably Nutty)
The word terrorism is overused. Why is it that;
Disgruntled employee puts anthrax in the mail to his ex co-workers = Criminal
Man poisons batches of baby formula = Criminal
Kid shoots up school = Criminal
DC Sniper(s) = Criminals
We need to focus on any message that causes anyone to commit any kind of crime against a large number of people. But "Muslim Terrorist" is a crock of sh1t and stops any kind of sensible analysis of the actual matter at hand.
We've literally been conditioned to hear zebra's.
Now you mention it, I've never met a non-white mormon.Oh yeah, I know he was sentenced to 2 years back in January last year. It's confirmed then that he is definitely not out and involved? Hopefully so, as that would be a huge blow for public confidence in the justice/intelligence system.
The Deputy Commissioner of the Met, said that they believe they know the attacker's identity. Later in the statement he said that the operating assumption for the motive was that of Islamist terrorism.
Last edited:
Well in fairness I posted something to Eire yesterday and immediately regretted it as I'm sure he has today, happens dun't it.