- Joined
- Jan 23, 2015
- Messages
- 896
They are a disgrace.
Bring back hanging...
Bring back hanging...
Based on what?
Manchester United were a bigger financial powerhouse before Woodward, relatively speaking. We had the highest revenue in the world for years and years.
When the Glazers took over, Manchester United were number 1 on the Deloitte money list with Liverpool’s revenue being roughly 50% of ours. Now we’re third and Liverpool are earning nearly 80% of what we do. How is that progress?
Of the 10 top clubs on the 2005 Deloitte money list, every single non-Italian club (because of Calciopoli) have increased their revenue by more than us.
Bayern are at 94% of our revenue. This Woodward genius myth needs to die. He inherited the most valuable football brand in the world and didn’t advance it relative to our competitors.
I understand Glazers want to leech money out of the club, but how is that related to hiring actual football people as opposed to a banker? Surely it won't cost them much to hire competent people and it would also benefit their own selfish ends anyway since better football and results means more money. Would also keep fans happy too.
They just seem to like to do things the hard way or shoot themselves in the foot for no reason. If they want to keep Woodward for friendship's sake, they can do so in another capacity.
Ed struck the deal that bought United as a Glazer family plaything - any tenuous link they have to football is through him. They are bound together- both have nothing to do with the club, and need to be encouraged by those who love the club to feck right off!I am of the opinion that the Glazers are fine as owners, there is money while not 100% sufficient, there is money to spend. The main problem is Ed. It is mismanagement of spending on the footballing side. If he can solely focus on the commercial side, let someone else run the footballing side, that would be ideal. If he can’t delegate those responsibilities, he needs to go.
I am of the opinion that the Glazers are fine as owners, there is money while not 100% sufficient, there is money to spend. The main problem is Ed. It is mismanagement of spending on the footballing side. If he can solely focus on the commercial side, let someone else run the footballing side, that would be ideal. If he can’t delegate those responsibilities, he needs to go.
As an American, and a fan of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, I can tell you that the incompetence of the Glazer brothers is not limited to Man Utd. The Buccaneers have fallen apart since their father Malcolm fell ill in 2006 and the sons took full control. To wit:
- 73-131 record. A W-L% of 0.357. Which actually lowered the Bucs even further as the all-time worst in this stat. Literally the worst era for traditionally the worst team in NFL history.
- Fired super bowl championship winning head coach Jon Gruden because “none of the players liked him.”
- Hired and fired Head coaches Raheem Morris, Greg Schiano, Lovie Smith, Dirk Koetter within 12 years. None of which ever had HC positions again on other teams.
- First place in division 1x, last place 8x.
- ZERO playoff wins.
- Rebranded and have worst kits in NFL.
- Have has more MRSA outbreaks than any other NFL team. Have dirty facilities.
The NFL is purposefully designed for teams to not stay bad very long, yet the Glazers have led a horrendous team for 12 years now. And to make it worse, they have no money left to spend on players in the salary cap system.
I know futbol fans have deeper connections to their clubs than we Americans do, so I can only imagine how this feels for you lot. But I highly implore you to do what is necessary to rid yourself of the plight known as the Glazers.
Maybe the lack of movement on a technical director is an indication that the owners are set to sell.
The reality is that they are just that inept. The club is so unbelievably f*cked.
I’ve thought this too. There was talk about them not being interested in selling and taking a more “active” role in the club (god forbid) but my hope is that this is just the opening gambit to force the buyers hand and perhaps now that we’ve failed to qualify for the CL it has helped in some way to establish a value i.e. X amount for qualification to the CL and X amount for failing to qualify....clutching at straws?Maybe the lack of movement on a technical director is an indication that the owners are set to sell.
The reality is that they are just that inept. The club is so unbelievably f*cked.
You don't mind the Glazers too much? Wow. The people who have turned this famous club into a cash cow. They've siphoned out over £1billion between them, we've paid £800mil in interest fees alone. We were debt free.I don't mind the Glazers too much. I'd rather they weren't there but it's not like we haven't been given any transfer budget in recent years.
Woodward on the other hand. He's killing us with his reluctance to let go of the football matters, an area he clearly has absolutely no idea in. The Glazers need to see their cash cow is on the decline so either they sell us, or they force Woodward to bring in someone to help us reassert ourselves on the pitch. He obviously won't do it himself.
Based on what?
Manchester United were a bigger financial powerhouse before Woodward, relatively speaking. We had the highest revenue in the world for years and years.
When the Glazers took over, Manchester United were number 1 on the Deloitte money list with Liverpool’s revenue being roughly 50% of ours. Now we’re third and Liverpool are earning nearly 80% of what we do. How is that progress?
Of the 10 top clubs on the 2005 Deloitte money list, every single non-Italian club (because of Calciopoli) have increased their revenue by more than us.
Bayern are at 94% of our revenue. This Woodward genius myth needs to die. He inherited the most valuable football brand in the world and didn’t advance it relative to our competitors.
I understand Glazers want to leech money out of the club, but how is that related to hiring actual football people as opposed to a banker? Surely it won't cost them much to hire competent people and it would also benefit their own selfish ends anyway since better football and results means more money. Would also keep fans happy too.
They just seem to like to do things the hard way or shoot themselves in the foot for no reason. If they want to keep Woodward for friendship's sake, they can do so in another capacity.
You forgot that we have our own Ed Woodward: Jason Licht
I don't know that we have the worst kits, and I do miss the creamsicle, but those were changed early on under Malcolm.
The list of coaches since Gruden has been laughable. None of them should ever have been given a chance except for maybe Smith, and I thought he'd do better.
That said, I would argue that Cleveland has been more of a disaster over the same period of time.
So you would like David Gill back as CEO? The role that Woodward took over. Seems like a lot of people idolise him on here. And he was great for us. Guess what: not a "football person", but a finance guy much similar to Woodward himself.Came across this article:
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...-gm-jason-licht-to-avoid-too-much-instability
I am not too familiar with NFL, but fecking hell, this reads like the recent history of Man United. Substitute Bucs with United and Jason Licht with Ed Woodward and it's the same damn thing!
You don't mind the Glazers too much? Wow. The people who have turned this famous club into a cash cow. They've siphoned out over £1billion between them, we've paid £800mil in interest fees alone. We were debt free.
They haven't given us enough support at all. No where near.
The underinvestment was peak at Ronaldo's record sale when we replaced him with Wigan's Valencia, crocked Owen & farmer Obertan. They thought they could get by underinvesting on SAF's genius. They only started panic spending a fortune after they let all the mainstay of our team get old and retire practically at the same time. Vidic, Ferdinand, Evra, Neville, Giggs, Scholes. By then, the market had massively inflated, there was no longer SAF to paper over the cracks and it was all too little, too late. Where's our football structure behind the scenes? We went from LVG to Mourinho. You couldn't have picked a worse strategy than that. They are clueless, but they don't care because they are getting their money regardless.
So no, they haven't gave us enough money at all because they are the very reason we are in this position in the first place
The Woodward & the Glazers go hand in hand. We aren't getting rid of one without the other.
They all need to be ousted out.
I would say it would be nice for the class of 92 to start a campaign against them in the media, but they don't want to burn any potential bridges with a future boss it seems. All full of it.
Came across this article:
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...-gm-jason-licht-to-avoid-too-much-instability
I am not too familiar with NFL, but fecking hell, this reads like the recent history of Man United. Substitute Bucs with United and Jason Licht with Ed Woodward and it's the same damn thing!
That article shows that business acumen isn’t something you just inherit alongside daddy’s fortune.Came across this article:
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...-gm-jason-licht-to-avoid-too-much-instability
I am not too familiar with NFL, but fecking hell, this reads like the recent history of Man United. Substitute Bucs with United and Jason Licht with Ed Woodward and it's the same damn thing!
Woodward is the Glazers. He's their man. I'm talking about the bigger picture since they arrived in 2005. Not the last few years where they have panic spent. The non-existent strategy behind the scenes is on them. The panic-stations spending since SAF retired is on them. They should have invested properly whilst he was around then. The years of under investment which i noted above is the reason why we are even in this mess.Like i say, I'd rather they didn't own us, but us completely wasting the £600m we've spent since SAF retired is nothing to do with them. They have almost nothing to do with how the club is run on a day to day basis. That's down to Woodward.
Most likely already here.How long before the Galzers/Woodward PR machine invade this thread?
Best post I seen here so far.Woodward does a lot more than write the checks. He oversees or has full control off all ththe deals. That includes the stupid wages he gives, and prices he pays for players. He picks the mangers, he chooses when they should be fired. He chooses when they should be backed. And if it wasn’t clear before, it should be now that he’s putting his nose in footballing matters that he shouldn’t. Regardless of what you think about Jose Mourinho, how anyone can accept a fecking banker thinking he knows more about football than one of the best managers in the PL era, I don’t know.
No matter what else you think, you should know that Woodward is a massive knob that cares only about the money coming in. And even then, only in short term thinking. His long term is a fecking joke.
This.Came across this article:
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...-gm-jason-licht-to-avoid-too-much-instability
I am not too familiar with NFL, but fecking hell, this reads like the recent history of Man United. Substitute Bucs with United and Jason Licht with Ed Woodward and it's the same damn thing!
100% correct.Ed struck the deal that bought United as a Glazer family plaything - any tenuous link they have to football is through him. They are bound together- both have nothing to do with the club, and need to be encouraged by those who love the club to feck right off!
I am of the opinion that the Glazers are fine as owners, there is money while not 100% sufficient, there is money to spend. The main problem is Ed. It is mismanagement of spending on the footballing side. If he can solely focus on the commercial side, let someone else run the footballing side, that would be ideal. If he can’t delegate those responsibilities, he needs to go.
As an American, and a fan of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, I can tell you that the incompetence of the Glazer brothers is not limited to Man Utd. The Buccaneers have fallen apart since their father Malcolm fell ill in 2006 and the sons took full control. To wit:
- 73-131 record. A W-L% of 0.357. Which actually lowered the Bucs even further as the all-time worst in this stat. Literally the worst era for traditionally the worst team in NFL history.
- Fired super bowl championship winning head coach Jon Gruden because “none of the players liked him.”
- Hired and fired Head coaches Raheem Morris, Greg Schiano, Lovie Smith, Dirk Koetter within 12 years. None of which ever had HC positions again on other teams.
- First place in division 1x, last place 8x.
- ZERO playoff wins.
- Rebranded and have worst kits in NFL.
- Have has more MRSA outbreaks than any other NFL team. Have dirty facilities.
The NFL is purposefully designed for teams to not stay bad very long, yet the Glazers have led a horrendous team for 12 years now. And to make it worse, they have no money left to spend on players in the salary cap system.
I know futbol fans have deeper connections to their clubs than we Americans do, so I can only imagine how this feels for you lot. But I highly implore you to do what is necessary to rid yourself of the plight known as the Glazers.
You’ve done the research to fill in the gaps but it doesn’t make the higher up looks any better.Schiano was one of the many Belichick pupils that failed in the NFL, Lovie Smith was a pretty good defensive coordinator and he is currently the University of Illinois HC on a very lucrative contract and as you know college football is pretty big, Dirk Koetter is a pretty good OC and was picked by the Falcons as soon as he was sacked and they now have an other good HC on paper. Gruden was fired 6 years after the Super Bowl and it was deserved. They don't have a franchise QB because they haven't been bad enough to pick very high on a regular basis while the three other teams have franchise QBs.
You forgot that we have our own Ed Woodward: Jason Licht
I don't know that we have the worst kits, and I do miss the creamsicle, but those were changed early on under Malcolm.
The list of coaches since Gruden has been laughable. None of them should ever have been given a chance except for maybe Smith, and I thought he'd do better.
That said, I would argue that Cleveland has been more of a disaster over the same period of time.
You’ve done the research to fill in the gaps but it doesn’t make the higher up looks any better.
Jason Licht, the current GM, picked QB Jameis Winston with the #1 overall pick in the NFL draft. He’s been a bust. You only get one shot at those. So idk what you’re talking about.
Glazers must sell all teams. Last place 8x.
Totally agree.I genuinely cannot believe some Utd fans still believe this.
The rot started as soon as they ladled all their debt on the club. All we are seeing now is the result of years of under investment at a critical time and a lack of decision making based on football.
Preach.You don't mind the Glazers too much? Wow. The people who have turned this famous club into a cash cow. They've siphoned out over £1billion between them, we've paid £800mil in interest fees alone. We were debt free.
They haven't given us enough support at all. No where near.
The underinvestment was peak at Ronaldo's record sale when we replaced him with Wigan's Valencia, crocked Owen & farmer Obertan. They thought they could get by underinvesting on SAF's genius. They only started panic spending a fortune after they let all the mainstay of our team get old and retire practically at the same time. Vidic, Ferdinand, Evra, Neville, Giggs, Scholes. By then, the market had massively inflated, there was no longer SAF to paper over the cracks and it was all too little, too late. Where's our football structure behind the scenes? We went from LVG to Mourinho. You couldn't have picked a worse strategy than that. They are clueless, but they don't care because they are getting their money regardless.
So no, they haven't gave us enough money at all because they are the very reason we are in this position in the first place
The Woodward & the Glazers go hand in hand. We aren't getting rid of one without the other.
They all need to be ousted out.
I would say it would be nice for the class of 92 to start a campaign against them in the media, but they don't want to burn any potential bridges with a future boss it seems. All full of it.
You are correct Majima, the club is now just nothing more than a cash cow, for a bunch of lazy Americans. All anyone need do is look at the rubbish we have on the pitch, biggest club in the World? Great fans for sure, but no ambition and no direction for the club except to make some arseholes rich. The owners are the problem.You don't mind the Glazers too much? Wow. The people who have turned this famous club into a cash cow. They've siphoned out over £1billion between them, we've paid £800mil in interest fees alone. We were debt free.
They haven't given us enough support at all. No where near.
The underinvestment was peak at Ronaldo's record sale when we replaced him with Wigan's Valencia, crocked Owen & farmer Obertan. They thought they could get by underinvesting on SAF's genius. They only started panic spending a fortune after they let all the mainstay of our team get old and retire practically at the same time. Vidic, Ferdinand, Evra, Neville, Giggs, Scholes. By then, the market had massively inflated, there was no longer SAF to paper over the cracks and it was all too little, too late. Where's our football structure behind the scenes? We went from LVG to Mourinho. You couldn't have picked a worse strategy than that. They are clueless, but they don't care because they are getting their money regardless.
So no, they haven't gave us enough money at all because they are the very reason we are in this position in the first place
The Woodward & the Glazers go hand in hand. We aren't getting rid of one without the other.
They all need to be ousted out.
I would say it would be nice for the class of 92 to start a campaign against them in the media, but they don't want to burn any potential bridges with a future boss it seems. All full of it.