TheRedDevil'sAdvocate
Full Member
The funniest part about paying £4 million more than the release clause for Fellaini is that it all started as an attempt from Woodward to show that United would not be taken to the cleaners by other clubs.
The "not expensive enough" is a good point that I have made elsewhere @Rory 7
Might be worth a section on it? I can't remember the correct term economists give to goods that are desirable because they have a high-price, but our transfer business under Woodward was a classic example.
Pogba, £90m? Must be fantastic! Haaland, £4m? Rubbish! AWB, £50m? That's reassuringly expensive! Caicedo, £3m? How good can he be, really?
If memory serves, when Pogba arrived from Juve, Woodward was crowing about the number of social media followers the player had. Not what he would do for us on the pitch but how many people he could reach with his Twitter account.Wasn’t there one where deadwood bragged we don’t need to win trophies to make money, then bragged about how many twitter/instagram followers we had gained in a week and the noodle sponsor
Got taken to the cleaners by every agent out there. From October 2015 through February 2016 United spent more than £10 million on agent’s fees and between February 2017 and January 2018, that number was £18 million. Raiola snagged £41 million from the Pogba more and another £12 million for the Lukaku transfer.The funniest part about paying £4 million more than the release clause for Fellaini is that it all started as an attempt from Woodward to show that United would not be taken to the cleaners by other clubs.
There's a proper term for it though. I called it "Giffen goods" initially in another thread but was corrected by another poster - but I forget what he corrected me withLuxury goods
Yes that sounds like itIf memory serves, when Pogba arrived from Juve, Woodward was crowing about the number of social media followers the player had. Not what he would do for us on the pitch but how many people he could reach with his Twitter account.
There should be an entire section detailing exactly how much each agent got from United and under which manager. Make it salacious, spell it out clearly how much Raiola got by ferreting Pogba around (and making Lukaku the player who has commanded the most cumulative transfer fees in football history). We seemed to dine quite a lot with Mendes under Mourinho and Raiola too. The influence of ETH's agent. £70m for Hojlund.Got taken to the cleaners by every agent out there. From October 2015 through February 2016 United spent more than £10 million on agent’s fees and between February 2017 and January 2018, that number was £18 million. Raiola snagged £41 million from the Pogba more and another £12 million for the Lukaku transfer.
We signed him a year after the WC.Give Schweinsteiger a massive pay day, he cries in sick for the year then we watch his fat arse waddle out for the World Cup with Germany in the summer.
If memory serves, when Pogba arrived from Juve, Woodward was crowing about the number of social media followers the player had. Not what he would do for us on the pitch but how many people he could reach with his Twitter account.
The month after signing Pogba on a five-year deal, Woodward took great delight in telling investors that the announcement of Pogba’s medical had generated ‘the highest daily activity ever on our website’ and that ‘it was also the most retweeted Manchester United post of all time on Twitter’. Woodward also revelled in how Pogba’s transfer made a bigger impact on social media than when Gareth Bale joined Real Madrid or when Neymar signed for Paris Saint-Germain. Apparently, Pogba’s return to United remains the club’s most liked post on Instagram. https://www.sportsjoe.ie/football/man-united-paul-pogba-171702?utm_source=perplexity
This is how the guardian reported it at the time. It wouldn't surprise me if this is closer to the truth.People should ensure they supply sources if they are giving OP ideas to include, otherwise this is going to turn into a thread of Chinese whispers.
For example, this is false. The imposters turned up on his behalf to the La Liga HQ to pay his buy out clause (which is how buy out clauses are paid in La Liga, or used to be), they didn't deal with us at all and had nothing to do with the transfer being delayed a year. The reason we didn't sign him that year was because we didn't want to pay his buy out clause. Source (himself)
I can find This which only says they claimed to work on behalf of Utd and This which says the same but also adds when the league contacted us we denied we'd given anyone a mandate to represent us.This is how the guardian reported it at the time. It wouldn't surprise me if this is closer to the truth.
Rodrigo García Lucas, Alvaro Reig Gurrea and Guillermo Gutiérrez were photographed entering the league's offices on Monday afternoon, with less than 12 hours to go in the transfer window. The three men represent the Spanish law firm Laffer, which oversaw Bayern Munich's successful move for Javi Martínez. That deal was completed by paying the buyout clause, against the wishes of Athletic Bilbao.
It is understood the lawyers had been instructed by United to attempt to find a resolution to the transfer and, according to sources at the Spanish league, did so with the formal authorisation from Manchester United.
Herrera's agents were not directly involved in the operation and nor were Athletic Bilbao; they later confirmed to the league that they would seek to block the move, refusing to accept the transfer of money.
The lawyers did not deposit the €36m stipulated in the clause and were not able to meet the necessary requirements as far as documentation was concerned but they did hold talks with league officials. They departed over an hour later citing "bureaucratic difficulties".
They later briefed United as to the difficulties of closing a deal so late in the window; they could not guarantee that it would be completed successfully and without subsequent risks. The Martínez deal, by contrast, had been put together over more than a month.
Faced with the uncertainty and potentially extra costs involved in tax, United decided not to proceed, thereby forcing Herrera to stay in Spain, the sources state. United had told the midfielder to be prepared in the event of a deal going through. Once the deal collapsed, United claimed that the three men had nothing to do with them.
Spain's official buyout clauses are complex and United appeared not to be fully aware of the difficulties inherent in using them. In principle, it is the player, not the buying club, who is supposed to deposit the money with the Spanish football authorities.
However, Manchester United insiders again insisted on Tuesday night that the lawyers were not working directly for them and the deal collapsed at an early stage because they were not prepared to meet the €36m buyout fee.
Got taken to the cleaners by every agent out there. From October 2015 through February 2016 United spent more than £10 million on agent’s fees and between February 2017 and January 2018, that number was £18 million. Raiola snagged £41 million from the Pogba more and another £12 million for the Lukaku transfer.
Yep. Remember the #Pogback.Got taken to the cleaners by every agent out there. From October 2015 through February 2016 United spent more than £10 million on agent’s fees and between February 2017 and January 2018, that number was £18 million. Raiola snagged £41 million from the Pogba more and another £12 million for the Lukaku transfer.
Thanks guys for reminding me of this episode. There really is so much ground to cover. I'll file the Fake Agents entry under - Speculative Representative Revenue (SRR), where unauthorized agents attempt to manifest deals through sheer audacity!I can find This which only says they claimed to work on behalf of Utd and This which says the same but also adds when the league contacted us we denied we'd given anyone a mandate to represent us.
It makes zero sense we'd have instructed these lawyers to go and pay the buy out clause on our behalf - we'd have just sent our own lawyers to pay it. Or if we instructed them then the deal would have happened because they'd have paid it, turned up with the correct documentation and would debunk "we weren't aware of the difficulties" because they guys had already done it.
They were chancers.
I guess we will never truly know, but if I was going to put it in a book then I'd take what Herrera says over tabloids.