DannyCAFC
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2014
- Messages
- 2,660
- Supports
- Charlton Athletic
Sky Sports we’re reporting it.
Nice. Good deal that if true. Props to Levy for fecking over PSG as well, always a delight to see.
Sky Sports we’re reporting it.
New Tottenham midfielder Giovani Lo Celso: "It was an easy decision. It’s a club that plays in the Champions League every year, has an incredible stadium, a top-level training centre and a coaching team of Argentines that showed interest in me, and that was very important."
I will never doubt @GlastonSpur again!
New Tottenham midfielder Giovani Lo Celso: "It was an easy decision. It’s a club that plays in the Champions League every year, has an incredible stadium, a top-level training centre and a coaching team of Argentines that showed interest in me, and that was very important."
I will never doubt @GlastonSpur again!
Jealous, will be a top player and fan fave in no time. A joy to watch. Needs to polish his game and improve decision making/passing, but Poch will do that. We could have done with him, but seems we werent chasing any sort of CM/AM hybrid. Very disappointed really
I get where you're coming from but, in the 4-3-2-1 Ole likes to play, he'd have been a good option as the 10, and our midfield is so dire right now that he'd have been a good option regardless. Works hard defensively, can create, is a goal threat. I saw him a bit for Betis and he's quite the all-rounder. He even played up front a few times, and sometimes played as a deeper CM alongside Carvalho and Canales.We need general midfielders. The one thing we don't need is yet more players who don't quite play in midfield or attack. We already have more of these than we do actual midfielders. Spurs needed one in case they lose Eriksen.
Feck knows what we're up to. We've decided we don't need midfielders or strikers despite having possibly the largest squad in the world.
Every notable team in Europe has either a nice stadium or an iconic one. In the real world no player is going to choise one over the other based on a criteria as daft as this. Its easy to say new stadium when you're searching to explain why you signed for Tottenham over the alternative of no one, and can't say "to win trophies" or "i've always dreamed of playing for them"
People should probably stop listening to Gladston. It makes the forum significantly more annoying when his drivel gains traction. Ask him to explain again how Dybala chose Tottenham over United by deliberately pricing united out of signing him...
The nearest explanation we're probably ever going to get as what happened with Dybala is given here (with the player said to be "furious" that the transfer deal to Spurs broke down).
https://www.independent.co.uk/sport...aris-saint-germain-deadline-day-a9047451.html
The article includes saying: "... Tottenham began negotiating for Dybala soon after breaking their club-record transfer fee to sign the France international Tanguy Ndombele from Lyon for an initial £55.4m. They initially faced competition from Manchester United, who wanted to exchange the disgruntled Romelu Lukaku for the Argentine, only for the complicated swap deal to quickly break down. United also considered matching Juventus Sporting Director Fabio Paratici’s asking price, but found Dybala’s £350k-per-week wage demands prohibitive.
Such an obstructive demand also demonstrated that Dybala never really wanted to move to Old Trafford, as he had considerable doubts over their current profile (my emphasis). Tottenham was a much more appealing destination, particularly because of the opportunity to work with Argentine compatriot Pochettino and their status as a modern Champions League club... "
The article backs up what I said.
Except its been said many times that we came to agreement on his wage demands. The issue was, as was for Spurs also, agent fee and image rights
Why are people arguing and dick swinging about Dybala? United couldn't agree with nor could Spurs. No one came out looking better.
PS Coutinho rejected Spurs. @GlastonSpur
Why are people arguing and dick swinging about Dybala? United couldn't agree with nor could Spurs. No one came out looking better.
PS Coutinho rejected Spurs. @GlastonSpur
Well, the article says otherwise: "United also considered matching Juventus Sporting Director Fabio Paratici’s asking price, but found Dybala’s £350k-per-week wage demands prohibitive."
The nearest explanation we're probably ever going to get as what happened with Dybala is given here (with the player said to be "furious" that the transfer deal to Spurs broke down).
https://www.independent.co.uk/sport...aris-saint-germain-deadline-day-a9047451.html
The article includes saying: "... Tottenham began negotiating for Dybala soon after breaking their club-record transfer fee to sign the France international Tanguy Ndombele from Lyon for an initial £55.4m. They initially faced competition from Manchester United, who wanted to exchange the disgruntled Romelu Lukaku for the Argentine, only for the complicated swap deal to quickly break down. United also considered matching Juventus Sporting Director Fabio Paratici’s asking price, but found Dybala’s £350k-per-week wage demands prohibitive.
Such an obstructive demand also demonstrated that Dybala never really wanted to move to Old Trafford, as he had considerable doubts over their current profile (my emphasis). Tottenham was a much more appealing destination, particularly because of the opportunity to work with Argentine compatriot Pochettino and their status as a modern Champions League club... "
The article backs up what I said.
I've not really seen him play before, but having now seen some YouTube highlights - yes I know - I'm starting to get excited about what he could bring to Spurs:
Real Madrid vs Real Betis:
Barca vs Real Betis:
I think that was more the concern with Bruno Fernandes.On his day, he looks exactly what you need. Creativity, guile and works hard, I have heard that he does come with a lot of loss of possession though.
I've not really seen him play before, but having now seen some YouTube highlights - yes I know - I'm starting to get excited about what he could bring to Spurs:
Real Madrid vs Real Betis:
Barca vs Real Betis:
I watched at PSG, not a single in Spain. If he hasn't improved much then I don't see what the fuss is about.Anyway like 90 percent of the people in this thread, I've never seen this guy play. He has a cool name though. His name makes me presume he's an exciting player.
I actually thought he was fairly decent in Paris.I watched at PSG, not a single in Spain. If he hasn't improved much then I don't see what the fuss is about.
I think it’s both. You have to expect that though with someone who’s expected to be creativeI think that was more the concern with Bruno Fernandes.
Why are people arguing and dick swinging about Dybala? United couldn't agree with nor could Spurs. No one came out looking better.
PS Coutinho rejected Spurs. @GlastonSpur
A lot of people on here who don’t watch La Liga are going to eat their words in 12 months time.
This guy is a phenomenal player.
A lot of people on here who don’t watch La Liga are going to eat their words in 12 months time.
This guy is a phenomenal player.
It has probably been answered somewhere, but didn't PSG want him back after the apparently successful loan? It sounds like style-wise he would have been a good match for Tuchel.Extremely intelligent footballer. Makes the right decisions 9/10 times, movement is spot on. Technical abiliy is great.
Two potentially top midfielders for Spurs. Sigh.A lot of people on here who don’t watch La Liga are going to eat their words in 12 months time.
This guy is a phenomenal player.
He is not better Eriksen. Plus looked average for Argentina at the copa. Albeit, he would do great in this spurs side especially if he replace Ali down the middle. I don’t think he will do well if he plays of the right like Eriksen does.A lot of people on here who don’t watch La Liga are going to eat their words in 12 months time.
This guy is a phenomenal player.
It wasn’t in PSG’s hands. Betis had an option to buy and they took it.It has probably been answered somewhere, but didn't PSG want him back after the apparently successful loan? It sounds like style-wise he would have been a good match for Tuchel.
Ah, so PSG/Tuchel gave up on him before the loan.It wasn’t in PSG’s hands. Betis had an option to buy and they took it.
I thought he played really well today.
No.Do you mean Ndombele? Because Lo Celso didn't play.