ForestRGoinUp
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2018
- Messages
- 1,370
Yea it was just to point out the stupidity of your rant.What a horrible thing indeed.
Yea it was just to point out the stupidity of your rant.What a horrible thing indeed.
You have a weird definition of "rant"Yea it was just to point out the stupidity of your rant.
Get over oldies, it's 2019..
You made a dumb point. Get over it.You have a weird definition of "rant"
VAR is there to say, suck it up buttercup or keep on crying about it, makes for an enjoyable readYou made a dumb point. Get over it.
I’ll ask again, any regular match goers who like VAR?
Nothing to do with being old. You’ll see lots of young people against it.
I’m 27 and I hate it.
It’ll be the people who go to games who despise it.
They’re patently not necessary, hence the health of the sport. A bad decision one game was always made up by one the next game, or often just later in the same game.
Don’t let the fact the game had already stopped get in the way.Far too incompetent? Weren’t they judged to be getting 90% or more of the decisions correct? Without stopping game flow...
They’re patently not necessary, hence the health of the sport. A bad decision one game was always made up by one the next game, or often just later in the same game.
Hicks and Gillett were amazing. Don't sell yourselves short.We... we did?
Besides there is no way to prove that decisions even themselves like that.Oh come on, football is a multi-billion pounds industry, it cannot rely on desicions evening themselves out over the course of a season. Which is probably why all the major European clubs supported the decision to implement VAR.
Kids need the breaks in play to check their twitter page?Get over oldies, it's 2019..
He’s made twice as many posts in this thread as anyone else but you’re the one who is ranting...You have a weird definition of "rant"
You don’t reckon Fabianski would’ve been able to save that if his feet were touching the line? Being deliberately obtuse?So penalties are just free goals then.
It’s a multi billion pound industry yes, in entertainment. Not sure how it can be argued that VAR won’t inhibit some of that entertainment.Oh come on, football is a multi-billion pounds industry, it cannot rely on desicions evening themselves out over the course of a season. Which is probably why all the major European clubs supported the decision to implement VAR.
They’re patently not necessary, hence the health of the sport. A bad decision one game was always made up by one the next game, or often just later in the same game.
Your extension doesn't make any sense. I'll try this again.
The offside rule was introduced to prevent the clear advantage caused by an attacker 'goal hanging'. That advantage is not gained when an attacker is 0.1 mm ahead. When is that advantage gained? It wouldn't hurt for there to be consensus on when a significant advantage is gained, and have the VAR use that point as the trigger for determining offside.
You saying "there will always be ambiguity so let's set the point at zero" makes no sense.
Besides there is no way to prove that decisions even themselves like that.
It would make sense if the people who go to games were less fond of it than those who don't.
Unfortunately for that argument, the people who go to games are the small minority as opposed to all those who watch football. So the game isn't going to be designed for their benefit. The majority of people who watch football in general are in favour of VAR, so..... *shrugs*
You’ve never said the table doesn’t lie then I take it? Or anyone else saying this is absolutely necessary, implying the table has been woefully inaccurate all these years...That's absolute nonsense and magical thinking.
We will see how long football would last without the people going to games.
The penalty wasn't retaken because Fabianski was off his line. It was retaken because Rice encroached.You don’t reckon Fabianski would’ve been able to save that if his feet were touching the line? Being deliberately obtuse?
I don’t think you get how bad it is waiting for VAR in the stadium. It’ll definitely have an impact.The point is people aren't going to stop going to games because of VAR, or at least not enough of them to remotely worry those implementing VAR. They'll still go, they'll just complain more.
You’ve never said the table doesn’t lie then I take it? Or anyone else saying this is absolutely necessary, implying the table has been woefully inaccurate all these years...
Have an impact to the point of people not going to games ?I don’t think you get how bad it is waiting for VAR in the stadium. It’ll definitely have an impact.
They’re patently not necessary, hence the health of the sport. A bad decision one game was always made up by one the next game, or often just later in the same game.
Then change the rules and make them tolerant to whatever is the right amount, but let's not cry about "omg somebody is actually checking that the referee isn't making bullsh*t calls".
Why then are there pundits, sat pitchside today, saying something doesn’t feel right about this? That it is affecting the atmosphere.Football will be none the poorer for anyone daft enough to sop going to games because of this.
It’s a multi billion pound industry yes, in entertainment. Not sure how it can be argued that VAR won’t inhibit some of that entertainment.
If the aim is to appease the boring sacks who only care about the winner/loser of a game being 100% accurate, then the game will become less entertaining.
Because it's the first day of something new.Why then are there pundits, sat pitchside today, saying something doesn’t feel right about this? That it is affecting the atmosphere.
I don’t think you get how bad it is waiting for VAR in the stadium. It’ll definitely have an impact.
When they decided to go with VAR it was supposed to be only for Clear and Obvious decisions. If they had stuck with clear and obvious even for offside it would have been far better as far as I'm concerned.Then change the rules and make them tolerant to whatever is the right amount, but let's not cry about "omg somebody is actually checking that the referee isn't making bullsh*t calls".
This sounds like a S*n headline.
Nothing wrong with VAR. The sooner football is brought in line with the other sports to reflect a fair result the better.