Gary Neville at RB? No Way!

lchk

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 13, 2001
Messages
4,877
Location
Transfer Forum
He is a centre half. period. All his major cock-ups have been done at right-back where his positioning sense and reading of the game just falls apart.

Partner him with Rio.
 
sorry, dont agree. Yes, he made a major cock-up on Saturday. I still believe though that hes consistently one of our best defenders in an unsung way. He's vocal and a good organiser. The main thing we would lose though if he wasnt RB is the almost telepathic understanding him and Beckham have on the right flank when they play together.
Analyse mistakes, sure, but look at the bigger picture.
 
Originally posted by golden_blunder:
<strong>sorry, dont agree. Yes, he made a major cock-up on Saturday. I still believe though that hes consistently one of our best defenders in an unsung way. He's vocal and a good organiser. The main thing we would lose though if he wasnt RB is the almost telepathic understanding him and Beckham have on the right flank when they play together.
Analyse mistakes, sure, but look at the bigger picture.</strong><hr></blockquote>

I'm not sure about this telepathic understanding a lot of people keep mentioning. My main gripe with Gary Neville is his love of hoofing the ball 40 yards forward all the time.
 
You obviously weren't watching his performances at RB closely enough. Especially last season and the present one - major blunders which have to do with a poor reading of the game and he lacks the lightning pace to make up for it unlike silvestre.

At centre half, he is a lot more assured and his organizational skills can be brought forth to the max.
 
Originally posted by giggzy:
<strong>he had was good at RB last season</strong><hr></blockquote>
Pardon? He was poor at right back last season, particularly at the off side trap, but was much better when moved in as a centre back - though I don't think he has the pace or height to ideally fill that role. Either way, it was him that Alex blasted the most severely for saturday.
 
The problem is lchk is that we need a good flexible fullback as it is. If you want Gary to play as a centre back we would then have 6 of them, one full back in Silvestre, and Phil Neville. <img src="graemlins/houllier.gif" border="0" alt="[Houllier]" />
 
I have always preferred him at CB. He has good pace and his covering is good.

With Rio he would be good. Better than Larry at the moment. At least GNev would mark players.
 
Originally posted by Neil Thomson:
<strong>
Pardon? He was poor at right back last season, particularly at the off side trap, but was much better when moved in as a centre back - though I don't think he has the pace or height to ideally fill that role. Either way, it was him that Alex blasted the most severely for saturday.</strong><hr></blockquote>

I don't think he's a centre back at all, he's too small.


and yes i thought he played well as RB....much better last season than he's been for a long time.


his main problem is that he switches off...like he did against City...

BTW look back at the threads people kept him as RB for this season..........
 
A central back role requires More responsability than that of a right back.

So if he do silly mistakes on the right believe me he will be more rubbish in the heart of the defense
 
Hes a great right back. Playing him at cb isnt going to change a hapit for concentration lapses, if anything it would expose it more.
 
Murt, I'm not being funny, but is there anyone currently playing regularly for United who you don't consider to be great?
 
Originally posted by lchk:
<strong>You obviously weren't watching his performances at RB closely enough. Especially last season and the present one - major blunders which have to do with a poor reading of the game and he lacks the lightning pace to make up for it unlike silvestre.

At centre half, he is a lot more assured and his organizational skills can be brought forth to the max.</strong><hr></blockquote>

I was and have and I disagree. He is nowhere near as good a CB as JOS or Rio. He is the best RB we have unless Brown fulfills his early promise.
 
His height will be a big hinder for him to play in centre. Anyway we already have O'shea and Wes so there is no reason why we need to play Gary there.
 
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>Murt, I'm not being funny, but is there anyone currently playing regularly for United who you don't consider to be great?</strong><hr></blockquote>

Define great.

Following i consider world class.
Veron, Rio, Ruud, Keane, Giggs

The following ar top class premiership standard.
Beckham, Scholes, Butt, Barthez, Silvestre etc,

and the following decent/ handy squad players
Phil, Fortune, Forlan etc.

Your mistaking my loyalty to players and the club to my judgement of them, 2 different things.
 
It was against Liverpool at OT (volleyball incident). This to me suggests that Gary is more consistent than he is given credit for. This defeat will hurt Gary more than anyone, did you see his face in the tunnel? He understands how each and every one of us feels this morning, he is a true red after-all.
 
Originally posted by CheckOne:
<strong>It was against Liverpool at OT (volleyball incident). This to me suggests that Gary is more consistent than he is given credit for. This defeat will hurt Gary more than anyone, did you see his face in the tunnel? He understands how each and every one of us feels this morning, he is a true red after-all.</strong><hr></blockquote>

good post that.
 
The defensive problem at United right now IMO is that we lack a solid utility player.

Gaz although can play both RB and CB, he's not exactly flexible to do both positions very effectively. Many complain he hasn't been a good RB, some say he doesn't have enough quality to be a CB.

Phil lacks all quality, according to many posters. I tend to agree, although he is our only utility player - who has proven crucial at times like this when both Keane and Butt are out.

Silvestre, although prefers to play CB, there's clearly no space for him there as there are many in the team that are better than him in that position. Many also complain about his ability at left back.

O'Shea, though can play on the right side, and was played on the left, is not flexible enough. Clearly he was brought up to play only at CB.

Rio, no better place for him than in CB.

Blanc, someone suggested in another thread to put Blanc in CM. i think that's sort of rubbish.

Brown, great potential this one, but isn't strong enough to play either CB or RB full time just yet.

Overall, i think we need a solid utility player who can rotate around and do different things properly. a straight LB won't do the job IMO.

Maybe someone like Chivu has this quality. Just a thought. Although with limited knowledge about players, i happen to know that Kevin Nolan can play 6 positions on the field.. maybe he could be a quick fix answer to our bench.
 
Perhaps our defenders suffered a bit from having no notable ball-winning midfielders in front of them. Lets not get at the defenders for one bad game, our lack of goals has been a bigger problem all season.
 
Originally posted by WeasteDevil:
<strong>The problem is lchk is that we need a good flexible fullback as it is. If you want Gary to play as a centre back we would then have 6 of them, one full back in Silvestre, and Phil Neville. <img src="graemlins/houllier.gif" border="0" alt="[Houllier]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>

That's why I strongly believe we should buy another full-back of which my top choice would be Coly.
 
Originally posted by Murt:
<strong>Hes a great right back. Playing him at cb isnt going to change a hapit for concentration lapses, if anything it would expose it more.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Great at RB?

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />

Did you watch last Sat's derby with your blinkered specs on?
 
I think he is the best for this position for now, and he is one of the most consistent defenders in the squad. About the 'telepathy' he has with Becks though, nowadays it is rarely observed. However on the other hand, Silvestre seems to have developed quite a good understanding with Giggs down the left.
 
Originally posted by Huiting:
<strong>I think he is the best for this position for now, and he is one of the most consistent defenders in the squad. About the 'telepathy' he has with Becks though, nowadays it is rarely observed. However on the other hand, Silvestre seems to have developed quite a good understanding with Giggs down the left.</strong><hr></blockquote>

What telephaty? His passing is poor for an over-lapping fullback, all I see him do is hoof long balls up the right flank.
 
Originally posted by lchk:
<strong>
Great at RB?
<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
Did you watch last Sat's derby with your blinkered specs on?</strong><hr></blockquote>

Name a more consistent right back inthe premiership over the last 6 years?
He played poorly on Saturday, even Maradona had off days.
Btw your talking about Gary Neville not being brilliant at CB. Name a couple of games where he performed great at cb because ill name 2 where he didnt. At Anfield last season and in the West Ham game @ home.
Looks like your talking through your anus,,,, as usual :rolleyes: <img src="graemlins/yawn.gif" border="0" alt="[Yawn]" />
 
Originally posted by Murt:
<strong>

Name a more consistent right back inthe premiership over the last 6 years?
He played poorly on Saturday, even Maradona had off days.
Btw your talking about Gary Neville not being brilliant at CB. Name a couple of games where he performed great at cb because ill name 2 where he didnt. At Anfield last season and in the West Ham game @ home.
Looks like your talking through your anus,,,, as usual :rolleyes: <img src="graemlins/yawn.gif" border="0" alt="[Yawn]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>

So is he a better centre half than a right back?

Or have you noticed how he has played at RB starting from last season until now?

Without your blinkered specs that is.
 
Originally posted by lchk:
<strong>So is he a better centre half than a right back?
Or have you noticed how he has played at RB starting from last season until now?
Without your blinkered specs that is.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Well me, Sven Göran Eriksson and Sir Alex Ferguson seem to think so. But youd probably know better than the three of us.
Point out the games where he played well in the middle, as it stands im winning 2:0.
 
Originally posted by Murt:
<strong>

Well me, Sven Göran Eriksson and Sir Alex Ferguson seem to think so. But youd probably know better than the three of us.
Point out the games where he played well in the middle, as it stands im winning 2:0.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Perhaps I should point out how many matches Gary has screwed up at RB?

I'm sure it's more than your two ;)
 
Originally posted by lchk:
<strong>Perhaps I should point out how many matches Gary has screwed up at RB?
I'm sure it's more than your two ;) </strong><hr></blockquote>

How many times have you seen him play at CB, never judging by the way your tapdancing around questions, as usual.
Btw didnt you want rid of Gary Neville just a few months ago?
 
Originally posted by Murt:
<strong>

How many times have you seen him play at CB, never judging by the way your tapdancing around questions, as usual.
Btw didnt you want rid of Gary Neville just a few months ago?</strong><hr></blockquote>

Like the way you tapdance around mine? Or to put it plainly, maybe I think it's a stupid question which doesn't deserve an answer. Of course it's all a matter of perception. ;)
 
Originally posted by Murt:
<strong>

How many times have you seen him play at CB, never judging by the way your tapdancing around questions, as usual.
Btw didnt you want rid of Gary Neville just a few months ago?</strong><hr></blockquote>
When Stam was out he played in central defense and did very well I seem to recall. And last season I thought he had a good run when played there too.
 
Originally posted by lchk:
<strong>Like the way you tapdance around mine? Or to put it plainly, maybe I think it's a stupid question which doesn't deserve an answer. Of course it's all a matter of perception. ;) </strong><hr></blockquote>
Talking bull as usual and nothing to back it up with.
Your saying Gary Neville is a great CB and a useless RB, im just asking why do you think this?
 
Originally posted by Neil Thomson:
<strong>
When Stam was out he played in central defense and did very well I seem to recall. And last season I thought he had a good run when played there too.</strong><hr></blockquote>

dont get me wrong, i think hes a good centre back, I think hes a better full back though.
One slip up doesnt change that as im not the idiot type that decides to change a whole defence at the drop of a hat. If his weakness is concentration lapses and the odd mistake a change of position isnt going to rectify it, a good nighs sleep and better preperation would be more in order.
 
maybe someone can help me here ... yes gary neville screwed up but was anyone shouting at him telling him what to do? living in canada now i only see the games on the telly but apart from gary and john o'shea (who wasnt on the field)it doesnt seem the defence talks to one another. Not picking on the french but i rarely see BArthez move his lips and silvestre even less. Maybe someone whos close enough to the field can confirm or deny what i suspect. thanks.
 
I think Gary Neville has been a great RB for us over the years.

But he did cock-up up big-time on Saturday. Like everyone in the team, he's now fighting for his place. The problem is that his performances over the last season or so have been at a level...the quality of the premiership has improved. If the previously solid players are starting to make howlers, then they'll fail to keep their place.

Gary needs to prove he's a better RB than Wes Brown, John O'Shea, or even Phil Neville. My guess is Fergie is giving no free rides for the rest of the season, and no places based on history rather than current performance.
 
Originally posted by Murt:
<strong>
Talking bull as usual and nothing to back it up with.
Your saying Gary Neville is a great CB and a useless RB, im just asking why do you think this?</strong><hr></blockquote>

For the simple reason he plays better at centre half than at right back if you have cared to notice.

So are you saying he's better at RB than CH now?
 
Originally posted by lchk:
<strong>For the simple reason he plays better at centre half than at right back if you have cared to notice.
So are you saying he's better at RB than CH now?</strong><hr></blockquote>

When?
Do you not think hes a good right back?
If hes such a good centre half why did you want him out a few months back?
I think hes a better rb than ch, as do Fergie & Sven.
 
Originally posted by Murt:
<strong>

When?
Do you not think hes a good right back?
If hes such a good centre half why did you want him out a few months back?
I think hes a better rb than ch, as do Fergie & Sven.</strong><hr></blockquote>

He is a better CH than RB, doesn't necessarily mean he is the best around.

Your pathetic attempts in trying to justify your opinion by quoting ferguson and eriksson is laughable.