mu4c_20le
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2013
- Messages
- 46,746
I thought he was pretty poor when he came on. Looked like he needed a run of 4-6 games to get back to his 'good' level.
I don’t think Fred is great or anything. In fact he can be a right liability when he’s having one of his panic attack days. I’ve often said that he’s naturally quite talented but remains that 18 year old talent that is sometimes nervous, sometimes sloppy and someone’s excellent which is odd for a player of his experience.McTominay has height for set pieces. Which is pretty important when casemiro is injured to be fair. I was ok with him when eriksen was playing with him at the start of the season, he was a good foil for him
I think Freds a better player, i think mctominay might be better casemiro cover. I'd probably want to move both on pretty soon and Freds contract being up doesn't help his case.
Its another thing thats kind of in limbo because its dependent on if we have money to spend on replacements and how much. We might need to keep both
Agreed, he's very overrated on here for some reason. He has even been compared to the likes of Kante, just rubbish.Notice also that our opponents are happy to let him shoot, they almost never try to stop one of his errant missiles into row z.
whoever said it here first should be lionized, but that comment about Fred being excellent at breaking up play for both teams is bang on the money.
Agreed, he's very overrated on here for some reason. He has even been compared to the likes of Kante, just rubbish.
In specific set-ups he may be useful at times but is nowhere near the required level.
Has Fred really been 'that' inconsistent since playing in the more advanced position that he obviously always should have been playing in? He was our best player in the second half of last season, and after an admittedly poor start to this season he's been fairly good since (the one truly bad performance was when he was played in the deepest role against Leeds).Now all players have some degree of inconsistancy. Fred's is one of the wildest. Because there are things we've seen he can do at certain points. But you can never ever count on him to do it over several games. He can have a fantastic game like against Barcelona and then the next week we could play a team in the relegation battle and he's the 4th best central midfielder of the 4 on the pitch. By now we know thats what he is. Occasionally can come in and do very well on his day, but most of the time a substandard option thats easily improved on especially in terms of consistent performance.
Agreed, he's very overrated on here for some reason. He has even been compared to the likes of Kante, just rubbish.
In specific set-ups he may be useful at times but is nowhere near the required level.
To be fair there were some that did. Not many, but enough that it became something that critics like to remember and laugh at. Like the one guy who mentioned Ronaldinho when talking about Grealish and now that is forever mentioned on this forum as if everyone who rated him thought that.just Rubbish.
No one rated Fred to Kante - just that Fred is our Kante.
No, he is just our Fred.just Rubbish.
The vast majority don’t rate Fred to Kante - just that Fred is our Kante.
We don’t need to find a similar player to Kante or Fred because we have a good option in Fred for what he offers.
You have a poor memory.just Rubbish.
The vast majority don’t rate Fred to Kante - just that Fred is our Kante.
We don’t need to find a similar player to Kante or Fred because we have a good option in Fred for what he offers.
Has Fred really been 'that' inconsistent since playing in the more advanced position that he obviously always should have been playing in? He was our best player in the second half of last season, and after an admittedly poor start to this season he's been fairly good since (the one truly bad performance was when he was played in the deepest role against Leeds).
I feel like a lot of the criticism comes from when he spent waaaaaaay too long being played in a position that he obviously wasn't suited to. With the guy you are responding to mentioning Kante, I think it's worth noting that the one season Chelsea tried to play Kante in that role he was poor and everyone was saying he was finished, then they moved him back to his normal role and he was instantly the best in the world at what he does again. Fred obviously isn't that level, but that change in position is huge.
What's your point? It's a fact that Kante has suffered with injuries but that doesnt make Fred better than Kante. Just as it doesnt make Milner better than Kante.Okay what if this is about Kante being missing for ages and Fred being better than him?
Kante has been a ghost in the last couple of seasons.
Fred doesn’t have the success of Kante to ever be better than him - but Fred has been better than him in the last few seasons especially after Kante injuries.
Plenty of the fanbase saying no Kante was better in that thread.
So we should go ahead with McTominay, Fred, Martial and de Gea into the next season as starters then. They are all good enough.He does really well in one particular role. That is playing as a nr 8 with a proper CDM behind him. Look at his assists and goals this season.
People have very short memories. Someone can't make MOTM performances in Manchester United shirt and be "not good enough"
His late runs in the box are superb. If his shooting would be better he would have goals by x2 this season.
McTominay is clearly seen by ETH as our only Casemiro back up as things stand and according to latest reports he won't be sold as he's the youngest of the senior midfielders. If he is we'd need to replace him with a back up DM as none of our other midfielders can fulfill that role currently.We really don't have any choice in this.
We have too many Midfielders that we need to move on. We can't replace all of them in 1 summer, it's not practical.
And I haven't talked about our other positions yet that need replacing
I'm not convinced we'll have much budget. Maybe theres a deal with the likes of Rabiot on a free that means we can bring in 2 players but i wouldn't expect it. I guess i'm looking at the pair of them more as casemiro cover, where even there i think Fred might do a better job overall but I think McTominay is at least a more natural swap for a lot of casemiro's roles.I don’t think Fred is great or anything. In fact he can be a right liability when he’s having one of his panic attack days. I’ve often said that he’s naturally quite talented but remains that 18 year old talent that is sometimes nervous, sometimes sloppy and someone’s excellent which is odd for a player of his experience.
But on the other Mctominay is just a central midfielder. The bloke can barely pass the football and most of the time actively avoids it.
One should be backup and the other sold. If it were up to me next season this would be our midfield
Casmiero
New playmaking CM (like a FDJ alternative)
Eriksen
Bruno
New CM/DM who is also a good passer or dribbler (like the kid from STH)
Fred
Essentially our midfield lacks players who have time and quality to build up moves. That’s why I’d add two players who help with that and let McTominay and Sabitzer go. Or keep Sabitzer and get rid of Fred but based on what I’ve seen I’d prefer the latter.
Knowing us we will sign Sabitzer, keep Fred and sign 1 CM leaving us light in the buildup department again
So we should go ahead with McTominay, Fred, Martial and de Gea into the next season as starters then. They are all good enough.
He has been scapegoated because of the Liverpool game, poor from Ten Hag freezing him out.
Strange how he's been sidelined recently. He's been in generally good form.
It's alright saying this, but who would you play him instead of?
It's clear ten Hag wants a ball playing 8 (which Fred is not), he has a number 6 in Casemiro (which Fred is not) and Sabitzer in the last few games has looked really good in the 10 role.
First choice:
Bruno
Eriksen Casemiro
When Eriksen is out:
Sabitzer
Bruno Casemiro
When Cas is injured:
Sabitzer/Bruno
Bruno/Eriksen - McTominay
I think it's a mistake not playing Bruno as a no.10 and opting for players who get on the ball as little as Weghorst, Sabitzer and McTominay.
There was no reason today not to play Fred besides Casemiro which Ten Hag did in the last 4 ties in the Europa League with good success.
Think this is overshooting it a bit. He is used best when place close to opposition goal. Good to know that he can do a certain job against Everton and Brentford but it isn't like we've seen a reminiscence of Viera, Keane or Robbo there - "just" a player capable of the basics plus going for long balls (what has long been established as something he can do).Bruno has been nothing short of amazing as a number 8 in recent games, and I full understood why ten Hag went with the same against Sevilla.
Weghorst came on for a tired Martial, McTominay, more often than not, only deputizes for Casemiro and Sabitzer is a typical number 10, who looks to make runs in behind the striker and create space for others around him i.e. Van de Beek at Ajax.
As much as I like Fred, when all of our midfielders are fit, he, like McTominay, should be used as squad players to come off the bench to shut out a game.
Strange how he's been sidelined recently. He's been in generally good form.
Hopefully the beginning of the end of his time here
That's harsh. He has only started 20 games for us this season (in all competition) and has 6 goals and 3 assists. Fred played 90 minutes in many of our best games, e.g. both games against Barcelona and both wins against Spurs and City, and he has certainly contributed in a positive way. There is room for him in the squad.If Fred played for another club, and we watched him for 5 years, would anyone have him on our top transfers priority list? we paid £50 something million for him, would anyone want to spend that on him now? If he were an academy kid, I could understand, but he’s turning 30 next month and we’ve already seen his peak.
We already have him, and I think that’s why people are reluctant to get rid, but is he ideal for the role ETH wants him to play? The last two games he has been sublime and outrageously bad , often within minutes of each other.
People talk about Fred being more of an attacking midfielder, but if that’s not what he’s in the side to do, who cares? Against Leicester he let runners go past him far too often and wasn’t close enough to the player he was marking. Leicester created several great chances, 2 of which called for heroic saves from DeGea, and they created those chances because Fred wasn’t helping stop attacks, along with Garnacho of course.
Against Leeds he went to sleep for the 2nd goal, let his man run off him and was nowhere near him. Whatever he offers in attack is outweighed by his shortcomings. I sincerely hope his time at United is about done.
Fred's game time has suffered from the absence of Casemiro. For the balance of the team, Fred is more likely to be picked when Casemiro starts.Glad someone else sees it that way.
Only got a look in since Eriksen was injured, if we are being really honest about those games he had 2 or 3 god halves of football, Leeds and Barcelona, maybe one other but he wasn't in "great form". As soon as other options were available he was out of the team again.
Hardly a surprise really.
He's been here 5 seasons and the fact there's still question marks over whether he's good enough says all you need to know. A handful of good games each season isn't enough. Like the poster above said if he played for another club putting in the performances he does, no-one would be clamouring for us to sign him.Glad someone else sees it that way.
Only got a look in since Eriksen was injured, if we are being really honest about those games he had 2 or 3 god halves of football, Leeds and Barcelona, maybe one other but he wasn't in "great form". As soon as other options were available he was out of the team again.
Hardly a surprise really.