Fao Gb

Status
Not open for further replies.
WeasteDevil said:
A power trip?

You were shit stirring! And you are doing it again.

Why don't you simply shut up and be thankful that you can still post?
I would rather not enter into a discussion with you since I would probably get banned for just airing my views.
 
crappycraperson said:
:lol:
Nobody is talking about rules or PM/Search now.
Again you dodged the issue....
Does it really hurt your e-reputation that much for once to admit that fellow MOD went on a power trip and banned people unfairly?
Please only reply if you intend to actually answer not some random gibberish.

:lol:

I can't be arsed going back to re-read the shite you are refering to Crappy.

I have tried to explain the Caf's stance - if you don't like it then that's your choice.

It is also our choice to ban you. All Mods can ban as they see fit.
 
Marching said:
:lol:

I can't be arsed going back to re-read the shite you are refering to Crappy.

I have tried to explain the Caf's stance - if you don't like it then that's your choice.

It is also our choice to ban you. All Mods can ban as they see fit.
Ok, atleast you admit that MODs can ban people for feck all.
 
crappycraperson said:
I would rather not enter into a discussion with you since I would probably get banned for just airing my views.

You don't enter into discussions, you just take the piss.

And anyway, there is nothing to discuss.
 
I haven't been involved, and continue to post on both sites, without anyone removing any of my privileges. Which I think shows at least two things:

1. that it's actually piss easy not to get involved

2. that the RC mods are trying to be reasonable and do the right thing, but having a hard time of it

It's a bit like when referees make the occasional bad decision, isn't it? Hard to take, if it affects you, but is it actually the ref's fault, if they were executing their best judgement?
 
sincher said:
I haven't been involved, and continue to post on both sites, without anyone removing any of my privileges. Which I think shows at least two things:

1. that it's actually piss easy not to get involved

2. that the RC mods are trying to be reasonable and do the right thing, but having a hard time of it

It's a bit like when referees make the occasional bad decision, isn't it? Hard to take, if it affects you, but is it actually the ref's fault, if they were executing their best judgement?
And wouldn't be it better if they actually admitted later that they made the bad decission and rectified it.
 
sincher said:
I haven't been involved, and continue to post on both sites, without anyone removing any of my privileges. Which I think shows at least two things:

1. that it's actually piss easy not to get involved

2. that the RC mods are trying to be reasonable and do the right thing, but having a hard time of it

It's a bit like when referees make the occasional bad decision, isn't it? Hard to take, if it affects you, but is it actually the ref's fault, if they were executing their best judgement?

Yes but you hardly post these days, and are a bit gay.

I was about to start a FAO thread for you, I told you Evra is good, did you end up wearing the white suit?
 
crappycraperson said:
Ok, atleast you admit that MODs can ban people for feck all.


Prime example of where you are going wrong Crappy....you see what you want to see.

And that's why there is no point discussing this further with you.
 
Dubai_Devil said:
Yes but you hardly post these days, and are a bit gay.

I was about to start a FAO thread for you, I told you Evra is good, did you end up wearing the white suit?

I've posted quite a bit lately, and I'm not nearly as gay as all this is.

Evra was good today, though had a couple of moments towards the end when he was thinking about delivering letters.

Yes, I wore the ivory suit. It was pretty special. No, not in a gay way.
 
That's not actually being all that fair at all, noods. My head hasn't exploded for some time - though you can never be sure if it's just a ticking time bomb.
 
I haven't read this thread, but I'm guessing this might be relevant:

richterscale9sh.jpg


Apologies if it's not, in fact, relevant
 
Dubai_Devil said:
Poacher, ban him mods!

That would have been cool - a suit made of real ivory.

But it wasn't of course, though it was done up using baby's cocks.
 
This is the least gay internet politics thread ever.

Pletch, I was also going to start a FAO thread for you, I told you Evra was good, and do you remember your response to my poached egg feckup? My last thread was deleted.
 
sincher said:
That would have been cool - a suit made of real ivory.

But it wasn't of course, though it was done up using baby's cocks.

I was quite proud of my post, the speed of thought and play on words was brilliant.
 
Plechazunga said:
I haven't read this thread, but I'm guessing this might be relevant:

richterscale9sh.jpg


Apologies if it's not, in fact, relevant
Show me a thread on the caf where that wouldn't be, in some way, relevant
 
Dubai_Devil said:
I was quite proud of my post, the speed of thought and play on words was brilliant.

I was pleased with it too. Considering I had to think it up, log out, change IP addresses, switch user ids, and post it, and then think about replying to the fact that you were going to do an FAO Plech thread for me to respond to. It's no cocking wonder my head explodes sometimes.
 
sincher said:
I was pleased with it too. Considering I had to think it up, log out, change IP addresses, switch user ids, and post it, and then think about replying to the fact that you were going to do an FAO Plech thread for me to respond to. It's no cocking wonder my head explodes sometimes.

Wait, I though I was you, not the other way around.
 
Dubai_Devil said:
He will come good, like I said.
He might

Have you noticed that in every game he plays, at some point, he'll go down pretending to have injured his head?

I have. I've pointed it out several times
 
noodlehair said:
He might

Have you noticed that in every game he plays, at some point, he'll go down pretending to have injured his head?

I have. I've pointed it out several times

I have noticed that he gets kicked in the head quite often, usual due to his tactic of lieing down infront of the attacker.
 
noodlehair said:
He might

Have you noticed that in every game he plays, at some point, he'll go down pretending to have injured his head?

I have. I've pointed it out several times

There was that time today when he was kicked in the head.

I empathise with head injuries, see.
 
He also charges at people like a maniac, but then just stops and lets them run past.

He didn't do that today, but he did give the ball away on the edge of his own area several times
 
Dubai_Devil said:
This is the least gay internet politics thread ever.

Pletch, I was also going to start a FAO thread for you, I told you Evra was good, and do you remember your response to my poached egg feckup? My last thread was deleted.

Was it this:

richterscale9sh.jpg


?

noodlehair said:
Show me a thread on the caf where that wouldn't be, in some way, relevant

https://www.redcafe.net/showthread.php?t=41811
 
Dubai_Devil said:
This is the least gay internet politics thread ever.

Pletch, I was also going to start a FAO thread for you, I told you Evra was good, and do you remember your response to my poached egg feckup? My last thread was deleted.
It's Plech.
People using Pletch annoy the feck out of me.
 
He does usually go in for tackles like a lunatic, Heinze style. But he was Heinze-like, rather than Boumsong-like, in his judgement today.
 
That's a fecking harsh assessment, that. It was a fluke. Though he did deliver them the ball in the attacking third a couple of times near the end.
 
Plechazunga said:
Evra was largely responsible for the Fulham goal. He got caught upfield, made back the ground, but then somehow spandiculated to allow the cnut to shoot



That's nice to know Crappy.

Pletch, you're wrong, if it was Heinze he would never have been able to get back, it was just Evra's blistering pace that made him look like he had a chance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.