giorno
boob novice
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2016
- Messages
- 28,816
- Supports
- Real Madrid
They should lean a lot into it, and i do mean A LOT, to get people's interest imhoAye. Darth Rand is the better than Jesus Rand!
They should lean a lot into it, and i do mean A LOT, to get people's interest imhoAye. Darth Rand is the better than Jesus Rand!
Characters change from movies to adaptations anyway. Tyrion is quite different from the books for example (he is a much better person in the show), as is Jon Snow who is nowhere as heroic in the books.
Of course, if they do WoT, the characters should be much more mature than in the books, the middle books (would say 7-11) should be almost totally cut (bar going a bit on Rand's madness and Egwene's path to AS), the number of characters should be much lower than in the books (GoT cut so many characters and people still have trouble understanding who is who, WoT has more characters, I think around 2000 named ones), as should be the number of arcs (who needs 3 seasons to see how Fayle will be saved from the bad Aiels).
Heh. Jordan was an average/poor writer with some interesting ideas, but with very strange ideas about men and women. If you like somewhat realistic characters, or well fleshed out, interesting characters, or just cool and funny characters, this is not for you. If you want an interesting spin on the classic good vs evil heroic fantasy and don't much care for the characters, give it a go. Try the first book, see if the plot hooks you in or not. If it does you might make it to book 8 before setting the books on fire and cursing Jordan for wasting your timeAs for Wheel of time, having never read them and having some audible credits spare atm, are they worth it? One friend swears by them, while another can't stand them so I have never bothered.
Re Jon Snow, sure the case of him not being heroic is just that the show is now ahead of the books and doing all the heroic stuff we would expect to have seen if grrm ever got round to writing them?
As for Wheel of time, having never read them and having some audible credits spare atm, are they worth it? One friend swears by them, while another can't stand them so I have never bothered.
Heh. Jordan was an average/poor writer with some interesting ideas, but with very strange ideas about men and women. If you like somewhat realistic characters, or well fleshed out, interesting characters, or just cool and funny characters, this is not for you. If you want an interesting spin on the classic good vs evil heroic fantasy and don't much care for the characters, give it a go. Try the first book, see if the plot hooks you in or not. If it does you might make it to book 8 before setting the books on fire and cursing Jordan for wasting your time
About WoT, I love them but they have significant problems (juvenile characters and boring middle books). They have been discussed here a lot though, I probably have a hundred of posts on WoT in this thread.
Don't get me wrong, it is my second all-time favorite fantasy saga, and I love them. I think that it is worthy to read them, but I know that they have problems, which for some people totally break the books.Cheers. Neither ringing endorsements tbh. Might just try the first book and see what I think.
Cheers. Neither ringing endorsements tbh. Might just try the first book and see what I think.
Both.Can anyone confirm something. I've got the Lies of Locke Lamora on my list. Is it grim, funny/humourous or both? Because I can never get a straight answer on that. I've seen it recommended to people looking for 'light-hearted fantasy' and then other people will respond with horror at the suggestion.
Can anyone confirm something. I've got the Lies of Locke Lamora on my list. Is it grim, funny/humourous or both? Because I can never get a straight answer on that. I've seen it recommended to people looking for 'light-hearted fantasy' and then other people will respond with horror at the suggestion.
Both.
I mean, it isn't grim in the sense of real grimdark books (Abercrombie, Cook, Martin, Lawrence, Bakker etc), but it has pretty of grim moments, as it has brutal deaths. At the same time, it is quite humorous (but then Abercrombie books are very humorous too). It is definitely more similar to Abercombie books rather than standard epic fantasy ones like Tolkien, Jordan or Sanderson.
And it is fantastic.
It has a bit of everything. Has some comedy but also much violence. Go for it you won't be disappointed. One of my favourite series.
Don't get me wrong, it is my second all-time favorite fantasy saga, and I love them. I think that it is worthy to read them, but I know that they have problems, which for some people totally break the books.
I don't think that Jordan was a poor writer at all. His writing is at the very least in the level with GRRM, and his world building is second to none. The biggest problem is that he married his editor, so the middle books essentially have never gone through the editing stage.
It's a good series with some flaws. One of the greatest ever. But you need to commit the series. Starts off well, sags a bit during the middle and finishes with a bang.
Definitely worth reading.
Both.
I mean, it isn't grim in the sense of real grimdark books (Abercrombie, Cook, Martin, Lawrence, Bakker etc), but it has pretty of grim moments, as it has brutal deaths. At the same time, it is quite humorous (but then Abercrombie books are very humorous too). It is definitely more similar to Abercombie books rather than standard epic fantasy ones like Tolkien, Jordan or Sanderson.
And it is fantastic.
Lynch suffers from depression and he has been upfront about it. He seems to be better now (apparently was in a very dark place a few years ago), so things might go faster in the future.Funny and grim in the same way as The Office is funny and heartwarming.
Thorn of Emberlain got June 1. 2019 as hardcover release date on Amazon. Seems like Scott Lynch has learned something from GRRM and Pat. Rotfuss regarding building anticipation.
And there are 3 more books in the series. Meaning that with this tempo(1 book every 6 years) the last will come out in 2037. Luckily Lynch is younger than GRRM and in better physical state than Pat. Rothfuss, so he will still be able to finish his series. If not, then Jordan Sanderson can finish the series fast, like he did for Robert Jordan.
Lynch suffers from depression and he has been upfront about it. He seems to be better now (apparently was in a very dark place a few years ago), so things might go faster in the future.
Yeah I think that effected his writing in The Republic of theives. It certainly wasn't as polished as we had come to expect from Lynch. Still enjoyed it but undoubtedly the weakest installment in the series.Lynch suffers from depression and he has been upfront about it. He seems to be better now (apparently was in a very dark place a few years ago), so things might go faster in the future.
I thought it was in par with the second book, to be fair, and like a lot the chemistry between Locke and Sabella. For the first time, we saw a totally different aspect of Locke. It also built the stage for what is to come.Yeah I think that effected his writing in The Republic of theives. It certainly wasn't as polished as we had come to expect from Lynch. Still enjoyed it but undoubtedly the weakest installment in the series.
Aye. Darth Rand is the better than Jesus Rand!
I'm sceptical. Having watched Shannara Chronicles butchered in TV, I'm not holding my breath. Hope they make it a adult TV series and not aimed at teens.
Heh. Jordan was an average/poor writer with some interesting ideas, but with very strange ideas about men and women. If you like somewhat realistic characters, or well fleshed out, interesting characters, or just cool and funny characters, this is not for you. If you want an interesting spin on the classic good vs evil heroic fantasy and don't much care for the characters, give it a go. Try the first book, see if the plot hooks you in or not. If it does you might make it to book 8 before setting the books on fire and cursing Jordan for wasting your time
A bit rich when you defend Malazan books to the death though
Malazan is unreadable trash.Malazan is better than WoT though.
Malazan is better than WoT though.
Malazan is unreadable trash.
Malazan is unreadable trash.
Everything about Malazan is better than WoTA bit rich when you defend Malazan books to the death though
Everything about Malazan is better than WoT
Plenty of people are wrongPlenty of people will disagree
Plenty of people are wrong
It's been scientifically demonstrated that I am never wrong, so those who agree with me cannot be wrong eitherAgreed, in both groups.
It's been scientifically demonstrated that I am never wrong, so those who agree with me cannot be wrong either
That is not correct. RJ met ******* when she was an editor at TOR and she published his first book, the Fallon Blood, in 1980. They married in 1981, long before the first Wheel of Time book in 1990. She was the editor on all his books, so we can't blame her for the lower quality of the middle books. The main culprit for that, in my opinion, was fan pressure.I don't think that Jordan was a poor writer at all. His writing is at the very least in the level with GRRM, and his world building is second to none. The biggest problem is that he married his editor, so the middle books essentially have never gone through the editing stage.
Reckon you'll like Black Company, once you get used to the choppy prose and abrupt style.Just finished the Steelhaven trilogy. Derivative, but pretty fun. Seems like it's set up for a fourth but a brief google doesn't surrender any details.
Started The Black Company Chronicles.
The first page was a shock to the system after Steelhaven.Reckon you'll like Black Company, once you get used to the choppy prose and abrupt style.