Has sending out one of our younger players on loan paid off in recent years? Can’t even remember the last time we sent someone out on loan and they came back and looked the business for us... Beckham at Preston?
The true talents have tended to go straight into the team because we didn't already have quality in their position. The players who get overhyped in reserve football have gone out on loan and tended not to do that well on loan, or with the next few years of their career post United.
Its hard to imagine Rashford wouldnt have impressed if he went out on loan. But if McTominay, Williams and Greenwood had gone out on loan I'm not sure they'd be where they are in the squad currently. For example at the end of last season Greenwood looked great, taking his goals well and like he has a big future. But Ole was starting him at the start of the season and he didnt look ready at all. If he had been out on loan and put in those performances at the start of last season I'm not sure he would have been given the oppertunity to start banging them in and playing as well as he did later on.
The thing is, giving a bunch of players like McTominay, Williams and Greenwood gametime and a real place in the squad where they're going to play games means that other young players wont get that chance. We're always going to select a bunch of experienced players along with the young players, so someone like Pellistri will very likely be up against Greenwood, Williams, Traore and even people like Van De Beek who havent fully proven themselves at the club yet. Because they wont be taking one of the 5 or 6 experienced player slots, even if they are in different positions.
And then theres other reserve team players who are doing as well as Pellistri like Galbraith and Elanga. They dont occupy the same position but they are all vying for those 1 or 2 spaces on the bench or coming off the bench and having a chance.
Other than loaning these players out and them doing great and coming back a better player ready to play against men, the other way for them to progress is if we clear players out and give them a bit of responsibility replacing those players that they arent as good as yet. Fred and McTominay got that chance from Ander leaving for example. Other than looking great on loan and taking that momentum into the first team, thats very likely the only way players like Garner and Galbraith are going to become good enough - if someone like Fred or McTominay isnt there to play instead of them.
So for Pellistri the obvious wing examples are Mata, Lingard and James. Clear some of that out of his way and he'd also need to be impressing more than the youngsters in other positions, so that the wing isnt somewhere we select one of the experienced players and play a youngster we rate higher in another position.
Pellistri's avenue to getting games in the first team doesn't look that bright because we have Greenwood, Diallo and Ole seems to like James and they all need the football to prove themselves.
So yeah sending him on loan seems the smart thing to do as far as I'm concerned unless we're sending out a bunch of our younger players who already get gametime and then he might actually get a game