Rado_N
Yaaas Broncos!
Still nobody has been able to point to a rule supporting the calls for a ban or DQ.
I am most definitely NOT a fan boy, Seb should have been DQ from the race, what he did was wrong.
Lewis can be a 100% grade A cock , but not this time , he was totally blameless.
The punishment given at the time should stand adding more just smacks of professionalism.
Still nobody has been able to point to a rule supporting the calls for a ban or DQ.
Pretty much.From what I've read, disqualifications tend to be caused by a clearly measurable metric like weight limit exceeded, leaving pit lane when red light is on, that sort of thing. It's pretty rare for a driver to be disqualified for lets say, "erratic behaviour" which is open to interpretation, as evidenced in this thread.
Yes drivers get away with lesser penalties for hitting other cars, forcing them off track etc. under full racing conditions. But in those instances, they are attempting to gain a competitive advantage.
And this is where I think this incident differs from those. There was absolutely no intention by Seb to gain an advantage by pulling alongside Lewis and indulging in a bit of road rage.
It's this lack of precedent which is muddying the appropriate response.
Personally I think the stewards got it spot on in penalising Seb by some 30 seconds. He behaved like a cock and got a slap for it.
If Lewis hadn't had the loose headrest issue, he would probably have won that race and the punishment would have felt more appropriate in that he would have gained loads of points over Seb. Also the 3rd red flag helped Seb as he could get the damaged nose replaced and that didn't really help in terms of how things washed out.
There's no need for any further action. 3 points on his licence and dropped points is punishment enough for, lets face it, was an incident which was frankly hilarious, caused no damage (other than to his own car) and has had the effect of rejuvenating this years' drivers championship.
Seb probably wouldn't want to do that again though...
Maybe there isnt one, but that doesnt mean the rules are rightStill nobody has been able to point to a rule supporting the calls for a ban or DQ.
Still nobody has been able to point to a rule supporting the calls for a ban or DQ.
i'd argue there should be one for gross unsporting behaviour. Obviously in footy there are red cards for violent conduct, you'd think it would make sense to have an equivalent one in F1.
Thats kind of what the points system is. Gain enough points, and your banned for 1 race.
Perhaps worth pointing out that the first hit damaged Hamilton's car, he was missing downforce for the rest of the race.There's no need for any further action. 3 points on his licence and dropped points is punishment enough for, lets face it, was an incident which was frankly hilarious, caused no damage (other than to his own car) and has had the effect of rejuvenating this years' drivers championship.
Perhaps worth pointing out that the first hit damaged Hamilton's car, he was missing downforce for the rest of the race.
So the stewards should have made up a rule?
Not sure they can really go wrong with any decision, a solid case for both outcomes. I feel he deserves his points stripped personally, which isn't too big of a deal really.Find out today if Seb gets any more punishment for Baku.
At the time the punishment was not enough, but thats what they gave and they should stand by it, my gut feeling is that he will be DNQ from the race and his points taken away.
you could be right,Think we just find out whether the investigation will continue today, don't think we'll know of any potential punishment for a while yet.
Exactly what i read today. It could go on for months.Think we just find out whether the investigation will continue today, don't think we'll know of any potential punishment for a while yet.
I would like to think he does, the incident was 100% his fault, hopefully that is the end of it.I wonder if he does really...
Following detailed discussion and further examination of video and data evidence related to the incident, Sebastian Vettel admitted full responsibility.
Ferrari has looked far more solid than Mercedes since the start of the season, tbh.This is reminiscent of last year with the engine failures. I have a feeling something will happen every time things look good for him. Last race was the rest and this race the gearbox. Meanwhile Vettel keeps grabbing the all important points.
I am reading Ricciardo to Ferrari and Sainz Jr. to Red Bull.Sainz SR seems to be stirring the pot with those Verstappen to Ferarri rumours.
Well they are obviously razor thin margins and they weigh up the risk to extra performance ratio. By pushing it too far they've given Hamilton a faster car so you could argue all's fair.Even if Lewis gets pole, starting from 6th , he will have his work cut out to win, fecking grid pens.
Gearbox faults are not down to the driver , it should be the team not the driver who takes the penalty,
They have indeedFerrari has looked far more solid than Mercedes since the start of the season, tbh.
It is difficult to overtake here.Even if Lewis gets pole, starting from 6th , he will have his work cut out to win, fecking grid pens.
Gearbox faults are not down to the driver , it should be the team not the driver who takes the penalty,
Said everyone before every F1 raceIt is difficult to overtake here.