So stewards gave Rosberg a 10s penalty, which moves him from 4th to 4th for his hit on Hamilton. Also a reprimand for driving a damaged car, which suggests he should have stopped. Had done that he would not have got 4th. Therefore, he gained a 4th by driving in a way not approved by the FIA. Weird.
There were a lot of very weird things about the decision. Normally when to cars go into a corner and don't come out both undamaged, ït's "incident involving cars no. 6 and no. 44 under investigation", now it was "incident involving car no. 6 is under investigation". So appearently the stewards already knew Hamilton was innocent before investigating the incident. That seems like a novelty to me, I can't remember any other example. The second novelty is the concept of 'racing room' that Rosberg supposedly didn't leave, this was not in the written rules, it has suddenly appeared out of thin air. This effectively means that Rosberg caused the collision by not leaving it, instead of Hamilton causing the collision by turning into Rosberg. Sky had already invented the new rule that drivers should turn in at the apex and can't choose their own line, but that wasn't creative enough for the stewards. Good luck for Hamilton that this racing room rule was only introduced when he was on the outside of Rosberg and not all those cases in the past were he was on the inside and pushed or bumped Rosberg outside the track. Appearently, it was also clear that Hamilton did not overtake under yellow, without any investigation, because it wasn't investigated.
So the next time Rosberg is on the outside and Hamilton doesn't turn in at the apex to push him out, he knows what he has got to do: Don't avoid a collision, just turn in. That will make F1 safer. But frankly I don't think this 'racing room' idea will not become the new rule. The rule concerning these kinds of incidents was best put into words by Martin Brundle a few races ago "You just don't go round the outside of Lewis Hamilton".
Re watching some on the race back on SSN. Never seen Toto that pissed but one positive the crash had is the lack of bad press they'll get for the strategy they put Lewis on. They put Lewis on a 1 stop, to decide it is too marginal. Then they pull Hamilton in for his 2nd stop. Rosberg comes in 1 lap later so Hamilton has no chance to undercut. To think Merc thought Lewis couldn't do 50 laps on the soft while Nico had already done 45 easily. It was a poor, confusing and illogical strategy.
Hamilton messed up the undercut himself with the driver error in his outlap. Mercedes was fighting Vettel's Ferrari and Rosberg got track position because of a lot of very fast laps and Vettel crashing. The idea that Mercedes should not only give Hamilton the first pit stop, but also leave Rosberg on his old tires a lot of laps so Hamilton can do the undercut, even with messing up a lap, is the idea that Mercedes should hand the win to him. We all knew he's the better driver anyway, so he deserves it.
I know teams try to defend drivers but the "brakes" excuse is poor. Sky did have a look at the in-car footage the “brake problem” did not exist. The problem was not turning the steering wheel apparently. Even when Lewis tries to get back on track Rosberg gave Lewis no space. Yet they are still making excuses for Rosberg.
If you leave the track you have to wait until you can get safely back on without slowing down cars that managed to stay on track. But appearently there's a rule that if the driver outside the track is Lewis Hamilton, you've got to give him space so he can win the race, especially after he turned in to you.
I don't think Hamilton deserves to get booed, he deserves the chance to earn beeing called a four time world champion. But if it is handed to him like this, he will go down in history as the most pathetic multiple world champion. It's not even his fault, he's just a spoiled kid, with robbing the fans from a fair fight with Rosberg, a fight he should be able to win, they're also robbing Hamilton of the chance to become a great driver.