Originally posted by mancred:
<strong>Agree 100%
<a href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/sporttop/page.cfm?objectid=12359322&method=full&siteid=50143" target="_blank">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/sporttop/page.cfm?objectid=12359322&method=full&siteid =50143</a></strong><hr></blockquote>
Agree about G. Neville. He just had a bad day. Phil however is not good enough and I guess its not his fault. He is being put in over his head.
Originally posted by kf:
<strong>I don’t trust Oliver Holt. He was the journo who took great joy in writing the “Fergie’s empire is crumbling” piece in the Times last season. He’s almost single handedly led the “Veron is crap” campaign. I suspect if you go back through his pieces you’ll find anti-Neville bollox also when it suited him. I agree with what he writes about the Neville’s caring about the club & I’ve said elsewhere that United need to retain a youth policy when SAF goes so as to retain a number of first team players who have an emotional attachment to the club. To use this as a premise to criticise the international players is just bollox – there isn’t any logical argument. United have always had a mix of players who have come up through the club & top international signings – look at Sir Matt’s teams.
The whole team were bad on Saturday with the honourable exception of Scholesy and possibly Ole (one of our international signings who supposedly doesn't give a toss). I suspect Holt is one of several journos who have been on the end of a tongue lashing from SAF in the fearsome post match press conferences. He’s got his own agenda which hasn’t got our clubs interests at its centre. We can make our own minds up about players as fans. We don’t need journos like Holt trying to create factions within the club.</strong><hr></blockquote>
he's a journalist. of course you shouldn't trust him.
the only papers worth reading for footy IMO are the grauniad and the telegraph. . .and even then they do have some tossers writing for them as well.
Originally posted by markorm:
<strong>I'm sorry, if he was sua tru red, he would do what he thinks is best for the club and complement the team instead of jeperdising it.
Know your place Phil.</strong><hr></blockquote>
So you mean he should have refused to play in midfield last Saturday for the good of the club <img src="graemlins/houllier.gif" border="0" alt="[Houllier]" />
Who would you have put in the starting line up instead of him?
Originally posted by sin65:
<strong>And again
"That's how we shall know them. That's how we can identify the prawn sandwich merchants and the neophytes and the know-nothings who have colonised our game."
Oliver Holt</strong><hr></blockquote>
Exactly.
Originally posted by mancred:
<strong>
Exactly.</strong><hr></blockquote>
<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
Originally posted by Julian Denny:
<strong>Great writer, Oliver Holt. Always enjoyed and largely agreed with all his articles on matters United</strong><hr></blockquote>
My problem with Holt stems from his reporting of games I went to last year. I know you and I are on opposite sides of the Seba Veron debate that’s fair enough. IMO Holt made his mind up about Veron very early last year and every report he wrote was angled to support his view. I’m the first to admit that Seba had some ‘mares last year and when Holt reported that he gave a goal away that he did give away that was OK. But when he reports the good games as if they are the same and the excellent games with words like “a suprisingly effective game from £28m misfit…” I started to think he had things on his mind other than just reporting the game. It will be interesting to see how he reports last nights game. IMO Seba had a poor first 20 minutes and then ran the game. Scored one, made one nearly got a brilliant third. What’s the betting that Holt concentrates on the first 20 minutes?
This United team doesn't like its bread and butter any more. It chokes on it. And asks for another slice of cake. <hr></blockquote>
Ouch!
Originally posted by devilish:
<strong>OHH Grow up will you?
We all love the club and the critism comes out of pain and NOT Hate
I would support the team even if we had 11 P Nev and 5 Forlans to replace them
But Hiding the truth to protect our players doesnt show our loyalty but our STUPIDITY.
The club needs a shake up, SAF, G BEST AND EVERYONE KNOWS THAT. Shutting up is only putting weight to the red devil's decline</strong><hr></blockquote>
It's a shame not ever player at the club can be a genius, but every club NEEDS a Phil Neville. He never gets a consistent run in the team. He never plays in the same position two games on the trot, and then you wonder why he doesn't emerge as man of the match. Get real!
He's an honest player, who does his job well 99 times out of a hundred, and will play anywhere. He's United to the bone, which is more than can be said of some of the recent signings.
If you want to look for a reason for the "decline", if that is what it is, rather than a transition. There are a lot of players far more to blame than Phil Neville
Originally posted by scalisto:
Despite all the "richest club in the world" hype, you're still a provincial club at heart.[/QB]<hr></blockquote>
Not provincial, mate. Mancunian.
We are a Mancunian club and that's what makes us special. The more we depart from our true fan-base and stop relying on our own players, the worse it gets.
Ask a Barca fan if he wants Catalans in the team, and you'll get one answer.
Originally posted by devilish:
<strong>Have you ever thought that despite being SAF's Golden child he had NEVER won a regular place? I mean to be bullied out by a has been at the end of his career and by a french scarlet ( Silvestre at his first yrs at OT) is ridiculous
Have you noticed that under the only decent England's Manager ( in the past 5 yrs) P Neville has been exiled from the english setup?This despite all his experience and reputation ( Eriksson prefared Powell, Bridges and W brown over P Nev)
The facts is that the heart is not enough to succeed at OT ( if so SAF would rely on the millions real Manutd supporters and stop buying players) You need talent. Talent which P Nev HAD NEVER SHOWN AT OT</strong><hr></blockquote>
United seem to have done alright in the past 6 or so years since Neville has been playing for us. I bet he has more medals in his cabinet than any other player at any other club in the country. He's certainly got more medals than any of the other non-United players keeping him out of the England team.
Devilish, if you were actually a mancunian, as you claim (yeah right), there is no way you would be dissing having local lads in the team.
Originally posted by mancred:
<strong>
United seem to have done alright in the past 6 or so years since Neville has been playing for us. I bet he has more medals in his cabinet than any other player at any other club in the country. He's certainly got more medals than any of the other non-United players keeping him out of the England team.
Devilish, if you were actually a mancunian, as you claim (yeah right), there is no way you would be dissing having local lads in the team.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Loads of our youth teams are Mancs and won't get anywhere near our first team. Because players like Phil are picked ahead of them. I'd rather have Stewart (when fit) play in CM ahead of Phil, and I'd rather Tierney and Roche as full backs than Phil.
Originally posted by devilish:
<strong>
Even I can play (shit) in loads of positions
</strong><hr></blockquote>
Bollocks! <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
Originally posted by devilish:
<strong>The P Nev's supporters have one argument in common.
P Nev really loves Manutd. So do I
P Nev can play loads of positions. Even I can play (shit) in loads of positions
The facts are that He is not at Manutd's level and he is NOT Giving the competition needed to motivate the other players. Look at AC MILAN and REAL, their strength of depth is terrific and they can replace stars with stars.
About the transition thing OH God this is amusing. In the football world replacing your stars ( Cole, Stam and Yorke) with half decent players (Forlan and Blanc) is called weakening the team and not transition.
Get up from your wonderland ppl this is the second year that we are crap and the performances show that we are on the decline</strong><hr></blockquote>
Sorry Devlish, you are living in cloud cuckoo land! Players like PN will never pull up any roots, but EVERY team has players who are honest footballers, whether it happens to be Real, or AC.
They don't have a bench full of superstars. How many players on the bench at either AC, or Real have you ACTUALLY seen. Very few, like everyone else.
And in the football world, replacing Yorke,(who didn't want to play), and Stam (Druggie), with RVN, and Rio is progress IMO. But the job isn't finished. You talk as if the current team is the finished article!!
And as for playing shit in a number of positions, that doesn't surprise me, because you appearto know feck all about football