Ah come on. He's doesn't have Ibra's skill levels. That's guys touch was insane.
Stop moaning about his touch.
Ah come on. He's doesn't have Ibra's skill levels. That's guys touch was insane.
I said he was excellent at youth level (which is what got him first team chances), you called him 'shit' so I assumed you expected a Giggs like talent from a youth player in his first season who hasn't even had a loan yet. It was you who moaned and called him 'shit. You also have predicted Chelsea's future signings too by saying they won't go for Haaland and Sancho without giving logic.
Here's the logic: Sancho will be wanted by all clubs including Chelsea and will choose the best (not United right now. Chelsea need a replacement for Giroud and have money from Hazard hence Haaland. Now why they will likely get them is because they can offer them first team football while being in a better state than us. We could get Haaland but logic dictates he would choose somewhere else.
Is that illogical to you? Or would you rather live in imagination land where everyone wants to sign for us and we are the best club ever and aren't now a midtable team?
All my post was about is that we need target players like Olmo and 2 others that we could sign for the price of one Haaland or Sancho so that we can can get to a consistent position that the likes of Sancho become reasonable targets again. Also in my endless positivity I believe that maybe Olmo will turn out to be a better player than Sancho;
Awesome idea. Let's get a Twilight years veteran on 300k a week while Mason matures. Hopefully you wont moan if it's another Sanchez esque mistake and Mason doesn't turn out to be a top striker. I thought we were moving away from this mentality and targeting young, hungry players before they become world class?
It's sheer romanticism to assume Mason can make that step up.
No moaning at all just reality of our current situation. If Haaland has a choice of us or Chelsea then he'd be a fool to come here.
You know nothing of who Chelsea will sign either. Also Sancho will have his choice of all clubs and Haaland [robably the same. Barca will be looking for a Suarez replacement soon. that's just logic.
Chong has been excellent and continues to be at youth level so he ain't a lost cause. The real moaning is yours about a player who has just started his senior career without a suitable loan. Reality check: Morrisson really was the best underage talent this club has seen (probably along with Giggs) but he became jack shit. ie: the best talents can turn out shit and the likes of Chong can become something.
Gomes will move on unless we give him the opportunities, he has seen what caf darling Sancho has done and Pogba before that. Why would he logically stay?
O'Connor is a better talent than Dalot and injured much less. It was acceptable to let him go because Laird is here but in our current situation he is more than good enough to make it.
You also have no idea of what Chlesea will do so it's a moot point. They may or may not bid for them but logic points towards them doing so.
You really need to stop thinking about the 'Old' United and start thinking about us as the mid table side we are. Thinking we can't get the Haalands of the World isn't 'moaning' it's being realistic. We aren't a top team anymore but a mid table side. Would you be surprised if I told you that AC Milan can't buy Sancho? They are a much better historic side than us.
You talk about 'moaning' but I am one who still wants Ole here over even Poch (what a caf idiot I am), I see improvements in us that I haven't seen previously (on balance of play we should be at least 9 points better off this season). I simply want us to start acting like a team who needs to get from 6th to 3rd rather than straight to first (it's unrealistic). So stop wasting time on players that have better options and will choose them if smart and focus on 'lesser' talents who are cheaper and might well reach the top level anyway. Mane is the best player in the League right now for example and he was no 'Mmbape' was he was 18,
No moaning at all just reality of our current situation. If Haaland has a choice of us or Chelsea then he'd be a fool to come here.
You know nothing of who Chelsea will sign either. Also Sancho will have his choice of all clubs and Haaland [robably the same. Barca will be looking for a Suarez replacement soon. that's just logic.
Chong has been excellent and continues to be at youth level so he ain't a lost cause. The real moaning is yours about a player who has just started his senior career without a suitable loan. Reality check: Morrisson really was the best underage talent this club has seen (probably along with Giggs) but he became jack shit. ie: the best talents can turn out shit and the likes of Chong can become something.
Gomes will move on unless we give him the opportunities, he has seen what caf darling Sancho has done and Pogba before that. Why would he logically stay?
O'Connor is a better talent than Dalot and injured much less. It was acceptable to let him go because Laird is here but in our current situation he is more than good enough to make it.
You also have no idea of what Chlesea will do so it's a moot point. They may or may not bid for them but logic points towards them doing so.
You really need to stop thinking about the 'Old' United and start thinking about us as the mid table side we are. Thinking we can't get the Haalands of the World isn't 'moaning' it's being realistic. We aren't a top team anymore but a mid table side. Would you be surprised if I told you that AC Milan can't buy Sancho? They are a much better historic side than us.
You talk about 'moaning' but I am one who still wants Ole here over even Poch (what a caf idiot I am), I see improvements in us that I haven't seen previously (on balance of play we should be at least 9 points better off this season). I simply want us to start acting like a team who needs to get from 6th to 3rd rather than straight to first (it's unrealistic). So stop wasting time on players that have better options and will choose them if smart and focus on 'lesser' talents who are cheaper and might well reach the top level anyway. Mane is the best player in the League right now for example and he was no 'Mmbape' was he was 18,
I don't disagree with any of that. It would be nice to unearth our own little gem though, I've been extremely disappointed with our scouts over the years.Not great but has shown enough at underage that suggests a loan rather than losing him would be the best option. The further we fall the harder it is to attract the players we need and now the need to find those players early is incredibly important. We will probably miss out on Sancho and Haaland so we need to push for players like Olmo and Tonali early who could become as good or at least get us in a position to challenge for the Haalands of the World again. We need to bite the bullet and stop targeting Sancho right now and use that money to buy 3 players who'll get us back regularly in top 4 and then we can aim higher. We are a mid table team trying to get back to number 1 instead of accepting our situation and climbing gradually.
For instance getting to the 3rd best team in England right now is manageable by next season with the right cheap enough signings. Getting to 1st-2nd is basically impossible. However easier to build a 1st place team from 3rd rather than 6th,
I do think we could get Haaland because we can offer playing time but if I were him I'd go to Chelsea or Leicester right now if possible.
Agree with that. Always found Chong overrated on here. There have been others before him who have been better and moved on. I won’t bat an eyelid if he leavesYou've no idea who Chelsea will or will not sign.
Chong is crap.
Gomes could still sign the contract.
O'Connor is a decent player but I don't see him ever being good enough for our first team. Too small for CB and not in the same class as AWB or Laird for RB.
A lot of moaning here without much substance.
I agree 19 year old Zlatan was more technical and had more tricks up his sleeve, but Haaland beats him on everything else. Zlatan lacked a lot of end product early in his career, even though he scored the occasional worldie now and then. Speed, power, finishing, movement, positioning, decisions is among the qualities Haaland has a lot more of at this age. The only thing they really have in common is that they are freakishly tall Scandies about to explode into the international football scene.Ah come on. He's doesn't have Ibra's skill levels. That's guys touch was insane.
In my opinion we are, along with maybe Leipzig and Dortmund, the best option for him. It would surprise me a lot if he chose a place like Chelsea, where they already have a young similar type of player. He would be competing for one spot in the team with Abraham and Batshuai, and Frank would struggle to give him the minutes he wants.I said he was excellent at youth level (which is what got him first team chances), you called him 'shit' so I assumed you expected a Giggs like talent from a youth player in his first season who hasn't even had a loan yet. It was you who moaned and called him 'shit. You also have predicted Chelsea's future signings too by saying they won't go for Haaland and Sancho without giving logic.
Here's the logic: Sancho will be wanted by all clubs including Chelsea and will choose the best (not United right now. Chelsea need a replacement for Giroud and have money from Hazard hence Haaland. Now why they will likely get them is because they can offer them first team football while being in a better state than us. We could get Haaland but logic dictates he would choose somewhere else.
Is that illogical to you? Or would you rather live in imagination land where everyone wants to sign for us and we are the best club ever and aren't now a midtable team?
All my post was about is that we need target players like Olmo and 2 others that we could sign for the price of one Haaland or Sancho so that we can can get to a consistent position that the likes of Sancho become reasonable targets again. Also in my endless positivity I believe that maybe Olmo will turn out to be a better player than Sancho;
In my opinion we are, along with maybe Leipzig and Dortmund, the best option for him. It would surprise me a lot if he chose a place like Chelsea, where they already have a young similar type of player. He would be competing for one spot in the team with Abraham and Batshuai, and Frank would struggle to give him the minutes he wants.
Here we can offer at least a rotation role from the minute he sign the contract, in a young team with his former coach (who he has the greatest respect for) as manager. The current league table doesn’t mean shit. We are the third biggest club in the world, and wether you want to see it or not, going here would show the ambition of a winner.
Very true. Imagine being the Cantona of the 2020s.Good post.
I'm tired of the doomsday merchants saying "he would never come here" about every player on the market.
Being the face of Manchester United when(if) we regain our glory is probably the most lucrative and ambitious career move a young player can aim for.
And as soon as someone does come it will be 'they'll go to Real soon'. I don't know what pleasure some people get out of following us. That's following, not supporting.Good post.
I'm tired of the doomsday merchants saying "he would never come here" about every player on the market.
Being the face of Manchester United when(if) we regain our glory is probably the most lucrative and ambitious career move a young player can aim for.
I said he was excellent at youth level (which is what got him first team chances), you called him 'shit' so I assumed you expected a Giggs like talent from a youth player in his first season who hasn't even had a loan yet. It was you who moaned and called him 'shit. You also have predicted Chelsea's future signings too by saying they won't go for Haaland and Sancho without giving logic.
Here's the logic: Sancho will be wanted by all clubs including Chelsea and will choose the best (not United right now. Chelsea need a replacement for Giroud and have money from Hazard hence Haaland. Now why they will likely get them is because they can offer them first team football while being in a better state than us. We could get Haaland but logic dictates he would choose somewhere else.
Is that illogical to you? Or would you rather live in imagination land where everyone wants to sign for us and we are the best club ever and aren't now a midtable team?
All my post was about is that we need target players like Olmo and 2 others that we could sign for the price of one Haaland or Sancho so that we can can get to a consistent position that the likes of Sancho become reasonable targets again. Also in my endless positivity I believe that maybe Olmo will turn out to be a better player than Sancho;
There is a good chance that we will get him.
Makes sense for him and us. Dortmund would be a good logical next step. While we desperatly need a second striker and can offer the money and the opportunities to play for him in the next levelWhy?
Exactly the same can be said of us.While we desperatly need a second striker and can offer the money and the opportunities to play for him in the next level
Makes sense for him and us. Dortmund would be a good logical next step. While we desperatly need a second striker and can offer the money and the opportunities to play for him in the next level
CL football? A race for a trophy? That said, on the other side his agent is Raiola and thats is a point against us.Exactly the same can be said of us.
our current situation is not permanent, as long as our club stays stable, we'll be able to offer him what he wants including trophies.CL football? A race for a trophy? That said, on the other side his agent is Raiola and thats is a point against us.
Ah right, thanks. I'm sure you're right but my mind's now going on what the tax implications of all that might be. Still, having already displayed my ignorance I might be better staying out of it!
Is that how it is everywhere, or just Spain? I know that's the process in Spain.
I don't think so.There is a good chance that we will get him.
I don't think so.
If the rumors about his 20 €m release clause is true then loads of top team will be interested.
He's a Leeds supporter, his father got a history with us, we probably won't have CL football, we have two very promising young forwards, we won't be chasing for top silverwares for a couple years more at least. While Real, Barca, City, Bayern, PSG all need a new striker to replace their aging ones.
It'd be a big surprise for me if he'd sign for us.
Meanwhile, speaking back in September, Haaland hailed Solskjaer for the role the United manager played in his development.
"He has had a huge impact on my life, both as a person and as a trainer. He won the Champions League and was an incredibly good player. He has taught me a lot. I have dreamed of playing for the best clubs in the world my whole life, and I especially like English football."
Haaland was born in Leeds and lived his early years there. His father also spent most of his career playing in the Prem, so he has a special connection to the league. Ole also has a good connection with the player himself, his father and his agent.
Honestly i would say we are big favorites in getting his signature
Some rumours says close to Dortmund or Liepzig
Some rumours says close to Dortmund or Liepzig
Why would the tweet of a random (?) fan from Mexico be relevant?
Taxes are a thing to consider here, because there are two taxable transaction to be made. First the club has to pay money to the player which is a taxable payment and second the payment the player has to make to the club is taxable as well. That's why there are often a lot of shady third party deals going on, usually in form of a law firm or a lawyer, which also seems to a legal way of paying that fee without the double taxation but I'm not 100% how that exactly works.
I have to admit I'm not 100% sure about that but as far as I know buyout clauses are always between a club and the player and not two clubs, because it's part of the contract of the player, but of course it might be possible that the contract simply says "If a club deposits sum X I'm free to negotiate a contract with them."
That being said, are we sure there even is something like a buy out clause? Seems a bit too convenient that this is popping up just now that everyone seems to be interested in the kid.
Agree. I've always felt that Martial will be a much better player in a 2 striker formation.I mentioned in the Martial performance thread that I’d be very intrigued to see Anthony play in a front two.
I think him and Haaland could form a formidable partnership together. Both of them would be absolutely deadly up top together.