If anyone should know his capabilities it’s Ole
—————- Martial
Rashford—-Eriksen——Sancho
James
Greenwood
Haaland
firepower
No we need more and better play makers as opposed to giving on the concept entirely.Sign him and play 4-2-2-2. Enough of this silly number 10 nonsense when we don't have anyone capable.
------------Martial--------Haland-------------
---Rashford-----------------------James-----
------------Pogba--------McTominay---------
Shaw-----Maguire-----Tuanzebe------AWB
-------------------DDG-----------------------
I'm someone who doesn't follow fashion. If truth and Haaland's match statistics wind you up that means you need to stop listening to the hype.Are you on a WUM mate?
Haaland would be a disaster for united. He would break the team even more. He can't pass or dribble, doesn't tackle, intercept. He's be a passenger. Because other players would know that a pass to him ends a move, with us most likely losing possession, they'd think twice about passing to him. They wouldn't be able to help it even if instructed to pass to him. That'd bring a lot of doubt and nervousness to the whole team. Haaland would break United. I have no problem with tall, strong players. I favour them. But if they can't really play as part of the team, they'd just be poison to a team.
I'm looking at his Opta stats. What he actually does during a game. If he doesn't dribble (but can), then his dribbles don't count. Dribbles not done - by someone who can dribble - don't count.What exactly gives you the impression he cannot dribble?
Truth? The whole post reads like a macabre work of fiction. «Posion to a team» What is that even suppose to mean?I'm someone who doesn't follow fashion. If truth and Haaland's match statistics wind you up that means you need to stop listening to the hype.
I'm someone who doesn't follow fashion. If truth and Haaland's match statistics wind you up that means you need to stop listening to the hype.
Haaland would be a disaster for united. He would break the team even more. He can't pass or dribble, doesn't tackle, intercept. He's be a passenger. Because other players would know that a pass to him ends a move, with us most likely losing possession, they'd think twice about passing to him. They wouldn't be able to help it even if instructed to pass to him. That'd bring a lot of doubt and nervousness to the whole team. Haaland would break United. I have no problem with tall, strong players. I favour them. But if they can't really play as part of the team, they'd just be poison to a team.
I'm someone who doesn't follow fashion. If truth and Haaland's match statistics wind you up that means you need to stop listening to the hype.
He's not Lukaku.Haaland would be a disaster for united. He would break the team even more. He can't pass or dribble, doesn't tackle, intercept. He's be a passenger. Because other players would know that a pass to him ends a move, with us most likely losing possession, they'd think twice about passing to him. They wouldn't be able to help it even if instructed to pass to him. That'd bring a lot of doubt and nervousness to the whole team. Haaland would break United. I have no problem with tall, strong players. I favour them. But if they can't really play as part of the team, they'd just be poison to a team.
He's stating the player would 'break' us. Why'd you think?Why is @Mark Pawelek getting pelters for pointing out something that's not this guy's strength? If we don't buy anyone creative, this guy will not play well, simple as.
The only way it matters at all which club a player is a fan of is if the player is getting similar offers from multiple clubs with similar situations but he's a fan of one.Haaland said on talkshite he was a fan whilst he played for the club. He also 'supported' forest while he was there
He's stating the player would 'break' us. Why'd you think?
I agree. I already wrote why I think this in the thread. Look at Haaland's Opta stats. What does he actually do during a game? Not much. He makes only 21 passes per 90 minutes and only finds a team mate in 6 out of 10. People currently complaining about the boring football and lack of attacking threat will explode if it got any worse. If he played in PL - the most intense on the planet - his pass completion rate would actually fall. From an already unacceptably low 61%.Swap Martial for Haaland as the number 9 in this current team and we would be worse
I agree. I already wrote why I think this in the thread. Look at Haaland's Opta stats. What does he actually do during a game? Not much. He makes only 21 passes per 90 minutes and only finds a team mate in 6 out of 10. People currently complaining about the boring football and lack of attacking threat will explode if it got any worse. If he played in PL - the most intense on the planet - his pass completion rate would actually fall. From an already unacceptably low 61%.
Those numbers sound concerning.I agree. I already wrote why I think this in the thread. Look at Haaland's Opta stats. What does he actually do during a game? Not much. He makes only 21 passes per 90 minutes and only finds a team mate in 6 out of 10. People currently complaining about the boring football and lack of attacking threat will explode if it got any worse. If he played in PL - the most intense on the planet - his pass completion rate would actually fall. From an already unacceptably low 61%.
Its really an easy concept posters love to gloss over. We dont have the creativity or structure for a target man striker. No quality wingers to provide him support yet most are desperate for his signature. Id stay far away from this transfer until we get more creative players in the team. Whats the point in selling lukaku only to get another limited goalscorer in?Swap Martial for Haaland as the number 9 in this current team and we would be worse
Agreed, but mainly because I think Martial is an excellent no 9. The reason we should sign Haaland is because it would give us depth in a position where we lack depth. There's such an enormous drop off in quality after Martial, this needs to be addressed.Swap Martial for Haaland as the number 9 in this current team and we would be worse
I agree with most of what you've said although it might have been a bit harsh. He isnt a good fit right now with the players we currently have. Our front 3 are all dynamic and can interchange positions. Haaland looks very limited in what he can do. We dont have enough creativity to support him and will only cause more problems down the line. What we most need is an attacking midfielder and better central midfielders with a good backup leftback.I agree. I already wrote why I think this in the thread. Look at Haaland's Opta stats. What does he actually do during a game? Not much. He makes only 21 passes per 90 minutes and only finds a team mate in 6 out of 10. People currently complaining about the boring football and lack of attacking threat will explode if it got any worse. If he played in PL - the most intense on the planet - his pass completion rate would actually fall. From an already unacceptably low 61%.
Those numbers sound concerning.
He isnt the right type without adding shit loads of creativity was more my point. Although I do agree Martial is a good 9.Agreed, but mainly because I think Martial is an excellent no 9. The reason we should sign Haaland is because it would give us depth in a position where we lack depth. There's such an enormous drop off in quality after Martial, this needs to be addressed.
Heard those same arguments about Aubameyang when he started banging goals in for Dortmund and every scout in Europe and their dog still didn't believe in him. Took an eternity to move to the PL, and at 29 going onto 30, still banging them in. Consistently.
Scoring goals is the basically the only way to win 3 points. Not pass completion.
Heard those same arguments about Aubameyang when he started banging goals in for Dortmund and every scout in Europe and their dog still didn't believe in him. Took an eternity to move to the PL, and at 29 going onto 30, still banging them in. Consistently.
Scoring goals is the basically the only way to win 3 points. Not pass completion.
It's a fair point, although the onus should be on improving creativity as well as getting more natural strikers into the club.
Besides which, James has a nice cross on him and Martial's interplay is very good. Haaland isn't a donkey that can't triangulate, right?
If we're going to insist on using #10's then we need a proper one in irrespective - I wouldn't hold out on a gem in the meantime, especially so when they come around so infrequently these days.
I have to say my eyes are really opened. Usually I’n careful with my opinions on players from other teams, because I mostly watch United. This guy, I’ve followed closely for a while, and I can categorically state most people in this thread don’t have a clue, one way or the other, so it’s hilarious to read the confident replies, especially these negative comments about his touch and ability.
Yeah, we need to be adding creativity either way though. I agree with you entirely here, but if/when we buy more creative players, Haaland would be an excellent option to have in our squad.He isnt the right type without adding shit loads of creativity was more my point. Although I do agree Martial is a good 9.
Can't pretend I've watched him intently enough to know one way or the other, but from what I've seen, he's not someone who sets off alarm bells as a complete 'no' in terms of what we should be getting in, for me.His touch is heavy when moving and his ability on the ball is not consistent enough yet to be direct passing with an angle in the build-up. Especially when under pressure.
Should spend a season or two in a technical league like Spain.
I agree. I already wrote why I think this in the thread. Look at Haaland's Opta stats. What does he actually do during a game? Not much. He makes only 21 passes per 90 minutes and only finds a team mate in 6 out of 10. People currently complaining about the boring football and lack of attacking threat will explode if it got any worse. If he played in PL - the most intense on the planet - his pass completion rate would actually fall. From an already unacceptably low 61%.
Not really, your post directly above mine does it so well.Care to elaborate?
I agree. I already wrote why I think this in the thread. Look at Haaland's Opta stats. What does he actually do during a game? Not much. He makes only 21 passes per 90 minutes and only finds a team mate in 6 out of 10. People currently complaining about the boring football and lack of attacking threat will explode if it got any worse. If he played in PL - the most intense on the planet - his pass completion rate would actually fall. From an already unacceptably low 61%.