Two headless chickens.
They are both error prone and injury prone and neither of them should still be at the club.
Eric Bailly | loan agreed with OM
- Thread starter MyOnlySolskjaer
- Start date
- Status
Two headless chickens.
They are both error prone and injury prone and neither of them should still be at the club.
Fulham his ideal level. The odd outstanding appearance scattered amongst mediocrity and chronic injury.
The first few when bailly arrived he looked fantastic. Shame it didnt work out for him. Loan with option to buy is a good deal. If he has a good season he will atttract alot of interest. Theres a very good aggressive CB in there somewhere. Needs a long run of games injury free to find it.
The first thing the people who bought Fulham off Al Fayed did was remove it.
Bailly wages is £4m per season. Even if it’s a loan, we are still getting a £4m to our transfer budget. Still good.
Ed says hi
He's MILES better than either.
He wouldn't. That's why it's not going to happen.
Yeah but he isn't though is he?
Does any other club that didn’t get promoted want our players no ? 
you spelled THROUGH wrong and your punctuation is off. What you MEANT was .... Yeah but he isn't THROUGH. Is he? You're welcome.
Brilliant news. Hopefully a club will be willing to pay that massive 8m asking price then. Heck - we should triple it if he’s MILES better than Maguire and Lindelof. He’s the fecking bargain of the summer.
by the way, I'd be happy to have him stay and see if he improves with decent coaching
Well you are right. I don't think his career is over but no that is not what I meant.
I have a soft spot for Bailly but your post was mental.
If we can get rid of him for actual money, then Murtough and co. are playing a fecking blinder.
But, it wasn't though, was it?
Yeah, it was just terrible
feel free to scroll on thenYour posts are incredibly confusing
Same as the Henderson rumours - loan with option to buy is a poor deal.
1. Sell
2. Loan with obligation
3. Loan with no option
4. Keep
All better options than Loan with an option which just takes the player for a year and leaves us stuck with him on a year less contract and a lower value next summer.
1. Sell
2. Loan with obligation
3. Loan with no option
4. Keep
All better options than Loan with an option which just takes the player for a year and leaves us stuck with him on a year less contract and a lower value next summer.
Sure thing. I'm pleased you are willing to give a chance to a player who you think is miles better than most of our centre backs.
Oh hell - I’ve just remembered: it was moved to the National Football Museum in Manchester
I’ve seen it and it’s absolutely vile. Has he been cancelled? If so it may have gone.
They’d probably still be better than laurel and hardyLike feck they would
Then again I think our lolly pop lady paired with dusty bin would have done better than Maguire and Lindelof last season
The (out) is confusing... is he sold/being sold or injured again? I assume it is the latter?
Yeah, it was total bollox tbf
London is an attraction I'm sure. Fulham is a nice area too and to be fair, its a good club with a nice set of fans.
But I'm biased, I had a thing about seeing craven cottage on match of the day
there was a fun nostalgia about it when I saw the highlights for some reasonSo, I should just pass that on to Ten Hag when he consults with me? That I'm willing to give Eric a chance and that pleases someone who's username is ironically "overrated opinion"? For the record, my opinion is irrelevant to the team's actions, as are everyone's on this site. Maguire has been trash. So has Lindelof for the most part. Bailly undoubtedly has faults. But he does possess the God given power, aggression and speed that none of our other backs possess. Ole and management were obsessed with mediocre English players and trying to salvage an 80 million mistake which in large part, led to last year's disastrous season. In my worthless opinion.
You said he was by a mile at least our second best defender and then said "I'd also be willing to give him another shot". Well obviously based on your take about how good he is. Was just a bit odd.
Take a breather.
Are people in here seriously suggesting that Bailly is better than Maguire or Lindelgod?
Jesus wept if they are
He is rash, reckless, lacks positional awareness, isn't particularly great on the ball.
All in all a disaster of a defender albeit one that is capable of the odd good game here and there.
He's not fit to lace the boots of Maguire.
Jesus wept if they are
He is rash, reckless, lacks positional awareness, isn't particularly great on the ball.
All in all a disaster of a defender albeit one that is capable of the odd good game here and there.
He's not fit to lace the boots of Maguire.
If Jose wants him then we should be open to selling him....for the right price
None of this Loan BS that Italian clubs are always asking about except for Juve who actually have some cash to spend
It's going to be a loan, isn't it?
I hope not but that’s where I’d put my money if I was a betting man.
don't understand why at his age we would loan him out....just sell him to Roma for a decent price and move on
Better than both Maguire and Lindelof
Exactly. See absolutely no reason from our side why we’d go for a loan.
Let him leave.
Varane and Martinez in the first 11 with Maguire and Lindelof as backup.
That should do.
Just don't loan him. Cash up you stint pricks.
Varane and Martinez in the first 11 with Maguire and Lindelof as backup.
That should do.
Just don't loan him. Cash up you stint pricks.
Zero reason to loan him out. If Varane keeps getting injured and Maguire and Lindelöf repeat last seasons performance levels it would be good to have Bailly.
Sell him or use him. Loan is useless.
Sell him or use him. Loan is useless.
- Status