dev1l
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2006
- Messages
- 9,598
Maybe because he s crocked most of the time?How the heck did he ever lose his spot to Lindelof. He's about 100 times better as a defender.
Maybe because he s crocked most of the time?How the heck did he ever lose his spot to Lindelof. He's about 100 times better as a defender.
Maybe because he s crocked most of the time?
Bailly is incredibly and wildly inconsistent. As likely to have a terrible match as he is a great one. Meanwhile Lindelof is average, but he's consistently average with just the occasional terrible match or very good match. For a central defender the latter probably does win out ahead of the former.Whatever. He's been healthy for a while now.
He is sooooo clearly miles better than Lindelof and so is Smalling. How does one get benched and the other loaned out. Some sort of Scandinavian bias from Ole would be the only thing to explain it cuz wth, that never should have happened. Lindelof never should have become a regular in the starting line up.
I completely agree with Gary Neville you will never ever win anything with that defensive partnership ever. Sevilla game was a great example of that.
Talent wise he could be arguably our best defender if he cut out the mistakes. He is a seriously good footballer.Funny how all our CB's have become contenders for the starting 11 due to Lindelöf's absolute shit show. Bailly isn't a player to be relied upon. He is both inconsistent and reckless. But I think he is better than Lindelöf though.
Apart from the fact over 4 years he’s proved he has no positioning, can’t head the ball and is completely reckless.
Add in that he’s injured more often than not, and it he’s not giving away a goal as a result of a brain fart, he’s getting himself sent off.
If I were him, I’d be fuming because at the age of 26 he can’t defend.
I’m no fan of Lindelof, and we all know we need a new CB, but Bailly is not the answer. He’s one of those players whose reputation with some fans has got bigger the more he’s been injured - despite all the evidence showing he’s nowhere near good enough.
Bailly is incredibly and wildly inconsistent. As likely to have a terrible match as he is a great one. Meanwhile Lindelof is average, but he's consistently average with just the occasional terrible match or very good match. For a central defender the latter probably does win out ahead of the former.
Lindelof was bad enough that Bailly should probably get another chance, but I'll be surprised if he goes five matches without either getting injured or having such a bad match that Ole has to sub him off. Hopefully he proves me wrong because when he is playing well he's great, but I just don't have any confidence in his consistency.
Spot on. The upside for me is that with Bailly - get some luck with injuries and allow him a chance to iron out his admittedly awful concentration issues and you could end up with a stellar defender.
Lindelof however is only ever going to give you average, passive defending, with the odd howler thrown in there for good measure.
If Bailly can stay fit he'd be my first choice next to Maguire any day of the week.
That's simply not true, in the only season he played fully he was one of our better players and our best defender
His injury record is worrisome but as others have said he's been fit for a while now so no harm in playing especially seeing the dross served up in front of him
Let him play and if he messes up then so be it..
Bailly came to the club and played well for a few months. At that point you are looking at him, and thinking he’s got some really good potential. The issues were still there, but you hope with time and training that these get ironies out and he improves.
Unfortunately I’ve seen nothing to suggest he’s still not rash, and impulsive. He still can’t head the ball, and his positioning is woeful.
He has pace and can tackle, but he’s a poor centre back. Is he worth a chance alongside Maguire, maybe he is because Lindelof is so average. But make no mistake, Bailly is not a player we can rely on.
When was his last?And you will be getting more howlers
He's been injured a lot of the time, either not available or building up fitness.Frustrating that Ole is only prepared to play him when Lindelof is either injured, rested or suspended
FixedBest defender at the club
Talent wise he could be arguably our best defender if he cut out the mistakes. He is a seriously good footballer.
He's more comfortable on the ball than any of our defenders. That can't be a reason why he isn't starting.
Apart from the fact over 4 years he’s proved he has no positioning, can’t head the ball and is completely reckless.
Add in that he’s injured more often than not, and it he’s not giving away a goal as a result of a brain fart, he’s getting himself sent off.
If I were him, I’d be fuming because at the age of 26 he can’t defend.
I’m no fan of Lindelof, and we all know we need a new CB, but Bailly is not the answer. He’s one of those players whose reputation with some fans has got bigger the more he’s been injured - despite all the evidence showing he’s nowhere near good enough.
So he’s equally as bad in the air as Lindelof but better at most other things?He provided the recovery pace that is necessary for a cb partner next to Maguire.
I just wish the bloke could head a football, he seems to jump for headers, haunches up and then makes contact with the ball as he is nearly back on the ground, his heading had been like this ever since he’s been with the club, surely this can be coached out of him?!?
That one in the first half where he had all the time in the world and he proceeded to head the ball sofly to an opponent. Funny guy!I’d play him against Brighton. He covered Maguire a couple of times with his pace. Still does some weird headers though.