Eric Bailly image 3

Eric Bailly Ivory Coast flag

2016-17 Performances


View full 2016-17 profile

6.5 Season Average Rating
Appearances
38
Clean sheets
19
Goals
0
Assists
0
Yellow cards
9
Red cards
2
Status
Not open for further replies.
Correct sir. You can also add David Alaba to that list. Alaba actually wanted to represent Nigeria but the FA there turned him down. Samuel Umtiti is another and so are Mangala and Sagna
Wow, really? Why on earth would they do that?
 
None of those guys were that good. None of them currently playing have shown anything close to this level of physicality and comfort with the ball as Bailly shows. He is an outstanding African defender. No one from the continent has the same set of skills. Lauren, in my mind was better than Toure. That's about it. The rest are nothing special.

Bailly did not get to Espanyol until he was 17. That's a stretch if you believe he is a Spanish product.

I keep looking at that list, and I keep wondering why you even brought those guys up. The closest in terms of dynamism is Aurier. But then, that builds into what I was trying to say doesn't it....

African nations have never produced a consistent stream of defenders. That's natural, since attacking talents stand out more. There is no incentive to train defensive-minded players. Some of them are solid, but most are forgettable.

Lucas Radebe wasn't that good? Have a word...
 
I jizzed myself silly over him in the newbies when he played for Villareal, and thought he could easily become a top cb. But now that I've actually seen him in the PL I genuinely think he with time and coaching can become a top5 CB in the world.

The strength in duels, the aggressiveness, the physique and pace was all very clear at Villareal, but these on the ball skills and also heading (was a weak point in La Liga) has convinced me 100%.

Part of the reason why he didn't stand out with his on the ball skills in La Liga probably is because CBs there are held to a higher standard when it comes to on the ball skills. But he was playing entirely more as a first line tackler there, and not a distributor. More a Vida than a Rio. Here in the PL he does a bit of both.
 
He is also more confident on the ball than most of our midfielders, if he can get to Blinds level of passing then he will be complete

i wonder where this "obsession" with centre backs' passing came from? did it star with lvg? genuinely wondering because i don't remember anyone caring about this 2 or 3 years ago now you see it in every discussion regarding defenders. the guy has shown himself to be an absolute monster CB thus far and his ability on the ball is more than great considering his position, i don't feel like he needs to "reach" a certain level regarding his passing ability to be considered "complete". I mean, he is fast, strong, great in the air, aggressive, has an eye for interceptions and assured on his tackles.
 
I never warmed so fast to a defender since the good old Vidic and Rio days. Beast of a defender, around everyone in the team, that slide during the celebrations. He does everything right at the moment, think he is quickly becoming a fans favourite.
 
The Martial thread was like this 1 year ago and now it has turned sour. I hope this thread isn't the same in 1 year.
The Martial threaad hasn't turned sour. just people saying h's out of form
 
The Martial thread was like this 1 year ago and now it has turned sour. I hope this thread isn't the same in 1 year.
If Baily is as good as Tony last season we are absolutely set.

And Martial is too talented not to recover his best.
 
He wasn't. Not in the top class bracket. To be top class, you have to play for the biggest teams or really be outstanding. Best defender from the continent though.

If I'm not mistaken, had Ferguson had it his way, he'd have been playing for us.

Also, by this logic, was someone like Shearer not top class?
 
The Martial thread was like this 1 year ago and now it has turned sour. I hope this thread isn't the same in 1 year.
The Rooney's thread has turned sour, The Depay's thread has turned sour but the Martial's thread is nowhere near that point, just some kneejerking a bit but most people understand he hasn't kicked on yet and will eventually get back on track.
 
The Rooney's thread has turned sour, The Depay's thread has turned sour but the Martial's thread is nowhere near that point, just some kneejerking a bit but most people understand he hasn't kicked on yet and will eventually get back on track.

I have read many posters say Rashford should start ahead of Martial. That's almost as bad as playing Young over Di Maria (LVG era)
 
I have read many posters say Rashford should start ahead of Martial. That's almost as bad as playing Young over Di Maria (LVG era)
Well like I said, you have your typical knee jerk posters here and there as all those vying for Rashford to play ahead of Martial on the wing after a good sub appearance have shown but that's about it.

I think more people are still understanding with Martial's poor performances so far due to various factors and most are expecting him to get back in form soon.
 
I have read many posters say Rashford should start ahead of Martial. That's almost as bad as playing Young over Di Maria (LVG era)

Yeah but they are right, you play the in form players, especially with young players out of form, it helps them sort their head to drop them for a little bit. Nobody is saying Rashford is better than marital that I have seen, but starting a player bang in form or a passenger is really quite an easy call. Then when Martial shows the right desire and starts showing it in training he can come straight back in to the team.
 
Yeah but they are right, you play the in form players, especially with young players out of form, it helps them sort their head to drop them for a little bit. Nobody is saying Rashford is better than marital that I have seen, but starting a player bang in form or a passenger is really quite an easy call. Then when Martial shows the right desire and starts showing it in training he can come straight back in to the team.


I disagree. Even if a top class player is out of form, you still play them.
 
Yeah but they are right, you play the in form players, especially with young players out of form, it helps them sort their head to drop them for a little bit. Nobody is saying Rashford is better than marital that I have seen, but starting a player bang in form or a passenger is really quite an easy call. Then when Martial shows the right desire and starts showing it in training he can come straight back in to the team.
Martial is an integral part of our team right now and it's important to get him back running and kicking as soon as possible. With him it's just a case of form having swayed away a bit and he's likely to rediscover it rather sooner than later, however in order to do that he needs to get playing a bit more.

This isn't like a Rooney's case where we know he just isn't up to high level football anymore which dropping would make sense. Martial is just having a slow start(like Kane had last season for Spurs just as an example) and will get on with his game most likely soon.

Beside even with his supbar performances so far, he's still a threat and get opposition thinking about him. Rashford should stick to striker role, the reason he's been so good so far is because he's been bedded in accordingly and not given plenty of responsibilities.

There is a huge difference between playing cameos and shining in them to being given a regular position where you're expected to deliver every week. You put Rashford on the wing instead of Martial, his performances won't be as impactful as they seem when he's given these striker cameo bit and people will start thinking he isn't performing well thus leading to doubt and eventually lack of confidence in the kid.

He's not ready to take on an entire role/position as his own(like people and media want to believe), let alone on the wing(which make his task much harder given he gets his applaud for his goal scoring feats). Martial has proven throughout an entire season he can play on that left wing for us and in form is a terrific player. Logically we try to get him back into that form with a bit more patience.
 
I disagree. Even if a top class player is out of form, you still play them.
Like Rooney?

In my personal opinion, I would rather give someone else a chance rather than Rooney, even though he is contributing. Same with Martial.

It's still early in the season, others could show to do better rather than having to wait for someone to improve.

That said, I trust Mourinho's judgement.
 
I disagree. Even if a top class player is out of form, you still play them.
What does that say to the rest of the squad? Even if you're on form and the player ahead of you is playing terribly you won't get a game? It's not as if Rashford is a massive downgrade.
 
If I'm not mistaken, had Ferguson had it his way, he'd have been playing for us.

Also, by this logic, was someone like Shearer not top class?

Indeed

Shearer was a top talent in a Premier League winning team and a record goalscorer.

Radebe played for a big team and he was one of the outstanding CBs of the PL in his time or are we saying Leeds wasn't big enough?
 
We should pick players based on their quality, not on their form in my opinion
In a game against our biggest title rivals, I'd prefer to put our the best possible side, that doesn't include players who are out of form.
 
We should pick players based on their quality, not on their form in my opinion

No, there needs to be a balance because form over time is what we should judge players on. Not what they were, otherwise why not buy Kaka?
Is Kompany now & last season as good as he was in his best season? Hell no.


Is Rooney for the past 2-3 seasons as good as in his prime? No.


How do you find out if a player could be good enough, if you don't give them a chance because another player is quality and therefore should always start despite being hilariously bad in the last 5 games?


Every player deserves chances to prove they're good enough but if the manager becomes complacent and lets 'quality players' never have to fight for their place.
Those 'quality players' aren't going to be as willing to give 100% or to improve what they're lacking as they know they can't be dropped.
 
We should pick players based on their quality, not on their form in my opinion

Surely part of a players' quality is held in their ability to perform to a high level consistently? World class players don't score hat tricks every game, but equally they very rarely have long periods where they're not performing to a high level.

Keeping an out of form player in a team when there's alternatives can be very detrimental to the team morale.
 
Here's hoping Bailly plays substandard haha.

But really it would be a massive help if they won as we wouldn't lose him for a month.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.