I like what I have seen from Tom Davies. Obviously not good enough to be a starter for United yet but he's a fantastic prospect and I hope he ends at United at some point.
Phil Foden, Mason Mount, Reece Oxford, Sessegnon, Dozzell, Gray, Sancho , Holding, and Reiss Nelson are all top talents coming through the youth levels.
Thats a load of tosh. Some people are influenced by the media, obvious, but most people I know or who following football passionately are able to form an opinion of a player without the guidance of The Sun.The problem is the hype train that you English all seem to ride as soon as any youngster has a couple of good games and is proclaimed the next savior of English football i.e. Rashford
I also believe people are too agreeable with larger media perception of your heros i.e. rooney Gerard lampard terry and afraid to drop them from English team even if they don't work together or playing poorly yet when a vastly superior young we player comes along and proves himself over a couple of seasons in one of their positions you are too slow to usurp the legend i.e. Kane v Rooney or carrick instead of one of lampard Gerard.
Basically your opinions are influenced too heavily by media hype trains to make a rational judgement on players.
I still think England could have a very good team now but would have to pick players to suit the system and ignore the nonsense and get a good strong manager.
The hardest things to get in international football are potent attacking threats and in Kane and Alli you lot have 2 of the best young options in that area of the pitch. I think if Jose was in charge of national team you would compete for honors with those 2 at the sharp end leading the charge. Mostly every other position in the team needs to be made of good players playing in a system that suits them and England have plenty of them.
Chile is one of the best NTs in the world and you think they're defense, goalkeeper or midfield looks great on paper? Would more than two of them get into the England NT?Nope, you don't. The defense is shit, as is the keeper. And Dier isn't much better. The attack is okay with Kane, Alli and Sterling though, but still nowhere a really top team.
Yeah, probably. Just because they arent as popular doesnt mean they are worse. Bravo, Vargas, Sanchez, Vidal would most likely get in.Chile is one of the best NTs in the world and you think they're defense, goalkeeper or midfield looks great on paper? Would more than two of them get into the England NT?
The defense is far from shit and as a whole probably one of the best thing about them. Since the Euros they've ditched Hodgson and Rooney and gotten a better Kane and Alli and Rashford. The biggest weakness apart from that missing MC is their inexperience.
Of course there is good English talent out there. Unfortunately, they're all at rival clubs. That, and, there's no point just buying English players for the sake of it.
I'd like Barkley at United, but they'd be nowhere to put him. We need a winger, though, and at the moment, there's not really any English wingers worth buying.
Sterling - Very good. Would have him at United but he's at City
Lallana - Again, very good. At Liverpool
Lingard - Got him
Rashford - Got him
Welbeck - Would have him back at United. Actually, I reckon he could do the 'Perisic' role Jose is looking for. Up and down the left wing. Obviously he's at Arsenal, though.
Oxlade-Chamberlain - Much better as a centre midfielder, in my opinion. Average as a winger.
Walcott - Not good enough. Does get his fair share of goals, though.
Up and coming talents:
Redmond - Good player. Needs to progress further, but someone we could look at
Demari Gray - Same as Redmond. Showing potential, but needs to progress
Roberts - At City, so no point. However, showing tremendous promise
Lookman - Fantastic in the U20's world cup. Needs more games, but someone worth looking at.
Ojo - Showing promise. At Liverpool, though.
In terms of the England team, I don't think we're any worse off than the other countries. We've got some really good talents, in my opinion.
Sterling - Very good. Would have him at United but he's at City = Is this a joke? He's got worse at City, showed no improvement since he was at Liverpool and if anything is more inconsistent. Has talent yes, but not an elite player
Lallana - Again, very good. At Liverpool. = Would class his as a good premier league player. Nothing more. Late 20's before he moved to a big club, done nothing of note there
Lingard - Got him = Got him but if he was at another cub would we desperately want to sign him? No. Average player.
Rashford - Got him = lots of potential. With right game time/management can be up there as a leading prem striker
Welbeck - Would have him back at United. Actually, I reckon he could do the 'Perisic' role Jose is looking for. Up and down the left wing. Obviously he's at Arsenal, though. = Wow. A striker being deployed in a wing back role. Makes sense. No chance
Oxlade-Chamberlain - Much better as a centre midfielder, in my opinion. Average as a winger. = unproven as a cm and inconsistent on the wing. Not an elite signing
Walcott - Not good enough. Does get his fair share of goals, though. = Agree. Not good enough
Up and coming talents:
Redmond - Good player. Needs to progress further, but someone we could look at = Average premier league talent. has ability, but not elite level
Demari Gray - Same as Redmond. Showing potential, but needs to progress = See above
Roberts - At City, so no point. However, showing tremendous promise = Has talent, unproven. Didn't set the world alight at Celtic which is a poor league. Scott Sinclair looked better, and we all know how good he was in the prem
Lookman - Fantastic in the U20's world cup. Needs more games, but someone worth looking at. = Looks promising, is raw
Ojo - Showing promise. At Liverpool, though. = Not seen anything of him, got no game time when Woodburn did so maybe that's an indication of his level.
England have very very few elite level players. Kane and Alli for sure, couple of maybe's in there like Rashford, Sterling, Stones. Its very grim. Barcelona/Real/Juve/Bayern wouldn't be in for any English players, they simply aren't good enough
Phil Foden, Mason Mount, Reece Oxford, Sessegnon, Dozzell, Gray, Sancho , Holding, and Reiss Nelson are all top talents coming through the youth levels.
Is it really a surprise the level of young English players is quite low bar the odd exception when you look at how the game is run in this country.
We demand instant success, pump millions into foreign managers who in turn rely on heavily investing in foreign players. Little to no effort goes into academies and when there is young home grown talent, clubs opt to sign a more expensive foreign option instead (ala loftus cheek/chalobah farmed out, 40mil bakayoko in etc etc).
Hardly any Home grown managers/Coaches, no long term development of home grown players. We are littered with Foreign managers/coaches/players right from the prem to league 2. Home grown players hardly stand a chance to breakthrough and every mistake is highlighted much more than foreign players.
I cant think of many examples where home grown talent is preferred over a fancy foreign signing
Showing signs of being a footballer capable of playing for everton, another who I hope isn't hyped too young. They have a good group of young players though.I like what I have seen from Tom Davies. Obviously not good enough to be a starter for United yet but he's a fantastic prospect and I hope he ends at United at some point.
Sterling - Very good. Would have him at United but he's at City = Is this a joke? He's got worse at City, showed no improvement since he was at Liverpool and if anything is more inconsistent. Has talent yes, but not an elite player
Lallana - Again, very good. At Liverpool. = Would class his as a good premier league player. Nothing more. Late 20's before he moved to a big club, done nothing of note there
Lingard - Got him = Got him but if he was at another cub would we desperately want to sign him? No. Average player.
Rashford - Got him = lots of potential. With right game time/management can be up there as a leading prem striker
Welbeck - Would have him back at United. Actually, I reckon he could do the 'Perisic' role Jose is looking for. Up and down the left wing. Obviously he's at Arsenal, though. = Wow. A striker being deployed in a wing back role. Makes sense. No chance
Oxlade-Chamberlain - Much better as a centre midfielder, in my opinion. Average as a winger. = unproven as a cm and inconsistent on the wing. Not an elite signing
Walcott - Not good enough. Does get his fair share of goals, though. = Agree. Not good enough
Up and coming talents:
Redmond - Good player. Needs to progress further, but someone we could look at = Average premier league talent. has ability, but not elite level
Demari Gray - Same as Redmond. Showing potential, but needs to progress = See above
Roberts - At City, so no point. However, showing tremendous promise = Has talent, unproven. Didn't set the world alight at Celtic which is a poor league. Scott Sinclair looked better, and we all know how good he was in the prem
Lookman - Fantastic in the U20's world cup. Needs more games, but someone worth looking at. = Looks promising, is raw
Ojo - Showing promise. At Liverpool, though. = Not seen anything of him, got no game time when Woodburn did so maybe that's an indication of his level.
England have very very few elite level players. Kane and Alli for sure, couple of maybe's in there like Rashford, Sterling, Stones. Its very grim. Barcelona/Real/Juve/Bayern wouldn't be in for any English players, they simply aren't good enough
The thing is that the youth system has got a lot better recently. Chelsea have arguably the best academy in the world currently. The won back to back youth Champions League titles recently and contributed lots of players to the England sides that won the u20 World Cup, the u19 European Championships, the Toulon Tournament and reached the the final of the u17 Euros this summer.
The current England side is weak but there is lots to be positive about regarding the players in the 15 - 20 age bracket at the moment.
It will be a test to see if we can get these lads playing in the seniors regularly but I'm hopeful as we haven't have this level of talent in a long time.
@Walters_19_MuFc I think you're overrating a lot of bang average players there mate.
Who am I overrating?
Chelsea's academy is the biggest joke in Football. Not one player since JT has made it from the academy to be anywhere near the Chelsea 1st team. They are all continually loaned out or sold, and the 1st team spends millions revamping the squad every couple of years. There may be talent there, but it is never utilised.
No, from the generation of 97 to the others who are coming it's a question of time untill your NT results in tournaments improve.Are they all just shite?
Not now, but for the future Tom Davies from Everton or Tammy Abraham who is loaned to Swansea from Chelsea look good prospects.Is there any we should even consider signing?
Really? Are all those players you mentioned, what you would describe as quality players? I mean Lingard and Welbeck, really?
No its poor youth development and youth participation at the grass roots level which means we have a smaller pool to develop players from. theres very little money invested on a national level on providing facilities or coaching staff for kids even in schools. Only a comparatively small percentage of the population are actively encouraged to participate, usually by their parents. The government and the FA do somewhere between very little and nothing.Lots of potential,
But i feel its the cultural thing Which keeps them fulfilling the potential at highest level and the Easy money they get is also a factor.
English players are never the most technical players in any sport so i think its mostly down to their Culture and food And diet preferences which keeps them Behind top level in any sport.
Don't think Bravo is better than Heaton or Hart and Vargas plays in Mexico after having been a bit-part player for QPR. Don't think he has any merit to play for England. Sánchez and Vidal would obviously get in and even more so considering they play in the two positions that are the weakest in England's lineup.Yeah, probably. Just because they arent as popular doesnt mean they are worse. Bravo, Vargas, Sanchez, Vidal would most likely get in.
No, which means you clearly didn't ready my post before commenting.
Butland -I think the issue is fees as opposed to necessarily quality.
Butland - could be a long-term replacement if De Gea leaves
Alli - Would be a great signing if he was attainable
Dier - Was heavily linked and would have been a good signing at the very least IMO.
Rose/Bertrand - Both would be upgrades at LB at this point with Shaw not progressing/always injured.
Keane - Linked and maybe should have been the CB signing as opposed to Lindelof.
Barkley - Not for the money Everton want(ed), but at reduced fee might be worth a punt
Kane - would have been an incredible signing but not attainable and you got Lukaku
Sterling - would be a good addition out-wide if he was attainable
Oxlade-Chamberlain - A bit like Barkley, not progressed as he should have but has potential and could have been worth a punt for a reasonable fee.
There's a lot of talented youngsters as well.
Not being funny but when you have Jesse Lingard in your squad and he plays a substantial amount of games - then yes, there are England players who would improve your group of players.
Bravo most likely is though, you do know he was the one who made Hart leave, not that he was that convincing. Dont just look where he plays, look how he plays, watch footage. He is much better than any wide forward for England, in terms of international football though. He has been a standout for Chili for some time, two times Copa America winner.Don't think Bravo is better than Heaton or Hart and Vargas plays in Mexico after having been a bit-part player for QPR. Don't think he has any merit to play for England. Sánchez and Vidal would obviously get in and even more so considering they play in the two positions that are the weakest in England's lineup.
Well I did. It seems you're scraping the bottom of the barrel for English 'talents'. TBH, not being English and all, I can say that from my perspective, the English players at the moment are generally pretty poor. When people resort to hyping the likes of Lallana, Henderson and Welbeck, that says it all.
Based on what? Lindelof was the starting CB in a title winning Benfica side while Keane was the starting CB in a team that nearly got relegated. I like Keane but Lindelof is the better player imo.I think the issue is fees as opposed to necessarily quality.
Butland - could be a long-term replacement if De Gea leaves
Alli - Would be a great signing if he was attainable
Dier - Was heavily linked and would have been a good signing at the very least IMO.
Rose/Bertrand - Both would be upgrades at LB at this point with Shaw not progressing/always injured.
Keane - Linked and maybe should have been the CB signing as opposed to Lindelof.
Barkley - Not for the money Everton want(ed), but at reduced fee might be worth a punt
Kane - would have been an incredible signing but not attainable and you got Lukaku
Sterling - would be a good addition out-wide if he was attainable
Oxlade-Chamberlain - A bit like Barkley, not progressed as he should have but has potential and could have been worth a punt for a reasonable fee.
There's a lot of talented youngsters as well.
Not being funny but when you have Jesse Lingard in your squad and he plays a substantial amount of games - then yes, there are England players who would improve your group of players.
Such a weird conclusion. Alli was in a league two side while Cleverley played for Man Utd, sorry but Cleverley was clearly the better player.Based on what? Lindelof was the starting CB in a title winning Benfica side while Keane was the starting CB in a team that nearly got relegated. I like Keane but Lindelof is the better player imo.
As for Butland being a long term replacement for DDG. Not a chance. We have a young GK in Joel Pereira who I reckon will turn out to be a much better GK than Butland.
Except England has arguably the best youth players in the world. The problem isn't at youth level.No its poor youth development and youth participation at the grass roots level which means we have a smaller pool to develop players from. theres very little money invested on a national level on providing facilities or coaching staff for kids even in schools. Only a comparatively small percentage of the population are actively encouraged to participate, usually by their parents. The government and the FA do somewhere between very little and nothing.
Based on what? Lindelof was the starting CB in a title winning Benfica side while Keane was the starting CB in a team that nearly got relegated. I like Keane but Lindelof is the better player imo.
As for Butland being a long term replacement for DDG. Not a chance. We have a young GK in Joel Pereira who I reckon will turn out to be a much better GK than Butland.
This. Doesnt work like that.Do you think that would have changed had Lindelof been with Burnley?
Based on what?
Such a weird conclusion. Alli was in a league two side while Cleverley played for Man Utd, sorry but Cleverley was clearly the better player.
I'm basing it on what I've seen of both Lindelof and Keane. Both are good young centre backs and I would've liked us to sign both of them but I feel Lindelof is the better player and so does Jose hence why we dropped the Keane interest and just went for Lindelof.Do you think that would have changed had Lindelof been with Burnley?
Based on what?
Butland -
Dier -
Rose/Bertrand -
Keane -
Barkley -
Kane -
Sterling -
Oxlade-Chamberlain -
with the exception of Ali not one of them would be good enough to play for man utd or indeed any of europes top teams , ever see kane linked with any of the big european teams ??? . ever wonder why ???
Based on what? Lindelof was the starting CB in a title winning Benfica side while Keane was the starting CB in a team that nearly got relegated. I like Keane but Lindelof is the better player imo.
As for Butland being a long term replacement for DDG. Not a chance. We have a young GK in Joel Pereira who I reckon will turn out to be a much better GK than Butland.
You mean Vargas?Bravo most likely is though, you do know he was the one who made Hart leave, not that he was that convincing. Dont just look where he plays, look how he plays, watch footage. He is much better than any wide forward for England, in terms of international football though. He has been a standout for Chili for some time, two times Copa America winner.