England v Sri Lanka

Slabber

Guest
Pace bowler James Anderson will be out of action for at least two months with a stress fracture in his back.

Confirmation of his injury leaves England with major problems ahead of the first Test against Sri Lanka at Lord's, which starts on 11 May.

Simon Jones suffered a knee injury in Glamorgan's C&G Trophy game on Monday and is unlikely to be considered.

Another paceman, Durham's Steve Harmison is also set to sit out the match with a shin problem.

"The parameters are that players will have to play a four-day game before the Test match," chairman of selectors David Graveney said.

"At the present stage, Harmison, (Michael) Vaughan (knee), Anderson and Jones would not be considered."

o.gif
One potential replacement, Hampshire's Chris Tremlett, is also struggling after suffering an ankle problem during their Championship game against Sussex.

The selectors must now hope that Andrew Flintoff and Matthew Hoggard come through pre-Lord's appearances for their clubs unscathed.

Durham's Liam Plunkett appears likely to play his first Test on home soil but there could still be one seam bowling place to fill against Sri Lanka.

It could mean Sajid Mahmood being promoted from the one-day squad and the selectors dropped a hint when he was pulled out of the England A team to face the Sri Lankans on Thursday.

For Anderson, meanwhile, he must now concentrate on rest and recuperation after consulting a specialist in Manchester on Wednesday.

He will miss the entire Sri Lanka series and even if his recovery estimate proves accurate, it is unlikely he will be risked in the opening Test of the series which follows against Pakistan, starting on 13 July.

"It is a huge blow to Jimmy. He has worked hard and patiently at his cricket to get back into the Test and one-day environment and obviously was hoping to be involved with England right through this summer.

"But he is a fighter and he will get all the help possible at Old Trafford to overcome this setback," said Lancashire coach Mike Watkinson.

Stress fractures in the back have interrupted the careers of many fast bowlers in recent years.

New Zealand's Shane Bond, for example, was out of international cricket for over two years.
o.gif

Lancashire believe Anderson's problem is nowhere near as serious.

"It is likely that he will need at least six weeks of rest and rehabilitation," said a statement on the club's website.

And he commented: "As I've already had a fortnight it means I might only have another month of the rehabilitation process.

"Obviously I'll need more time after that before I'm fit to bowl competitively again, but there are top people looking after me here at Old Trafford and I'm hoping to be back sooner than everyone first thought."
 
Shame for Anderson, he has been doing well lately.

So which bowlers are actually available?
 
England are lucky Sri Lanka are so shit at the moment. Even with their injuries, it would be a bit of a surprise to see them get beat.
Should be a bit tougher against the Paki's though, but i suppose most of the players will be back by then.
 
I'm looking forward to seeing Sangakkara play, he's one of my favourite players.
 
Yeh, he's a top player, after Gilchrist, probably the best keeper-batmen there is.
Always loved watching Vaas aswell. And Murali of course.
 
In terms of test cricket I would put him ahead on Gilchrist right now.
 
Given the injuries, here's the team I would play in the first test:

Trescothick
Strauss
Cook
Pietersen
Collingwood
Flintoff
G. Jones
Plunkett
Hoggard
Mahmood
Panesar.
 
I think he needs a break from the team and Cook deserves a chance.
 
Vaughan's knee is fecked pretty badly, and any bowling attack would be pretty sad when missing three of it's better seamers.
 
that's true. it'll be upto flintoff and hoggard to keep sangakarra and jayawardne down. it's a good thing for england that SL have been playing some really crappy cricket over the last few months. their batting's been kinda shite. if the english batsman can somehow outlast vaas and murali they'll have a good chance of winning.
 
England should win this one even with the injuries.

That is unless Murali rips through them, which he probably will do at least once.
 
That is one sad bowling attack i agree mehro, however what do you espect without Giles, Harmison, Jones and Anderson?
 
heffa said:
That is one sad bowling attack i agree mehro, however what do you espect without Giles, Harmison, Jones and Anderson?

i know. it was just a comment, wasn't surprised to see it.
 
heffa said:
Who do you think will win the series?

SL have been really bad of late. but england has too many injuries. it really depends on how england's bowlers perform. if they can keep sangakara and jayawardne quiet, with no attapatu in the squad, SL doesn't have any other big knock hitters.

england will take the ODI series 3-2.
Test matches 1-0 england.
 
Murali and Flintoff are the keys for me, if Murali gets on top of England's batting order it will be very hard for England to win. The English player that can turn the series more than any other is Flintoff at his best he can almost win a series off his own back. Saying that i think the competitiveness of the series rests on Murali's shoulders, England to win incase Murali can do something special.
 
Sri Lanka haven't got a chance. As much as I like them.(which I do)
 
Spoony said:
Sri Lanka haven't got a chance. As much as I like them.(which I do)
Don't you think with all the injuries and if Murali plays a blinder they have one?
If he plays his best he can tear apart England for under 200 and that gives Sri Lanka a chance in my opinion.
 
heffa said:
Don't you think with all the injuries and if Murali plays a blinder they have one?
If he plays his best he can tear apart England for under 200 and that gives Sri Lanka a chance in my opinion.

No mate, I don't think we have got a chance in this series, I am expecting a proper thrashing even though England have got several players out. Even if Murali plays a blinder our batsmen are still useless in playing in bouncy pitches.
 
roonaldo78 said:
No mate, I don't think we have got a chance in this series, I am expecting a proper thrashing even though England have got several players out. Even if Murali plays a blinder our batsmen are still useless in playing in bouncy pitches.


Yes. I don't think the bounce is that bad here, though. It's the seaming ball you'll struggle with.
 
roonaldo78 said:
No mate, I don't think we have got a chance in this series, I am expecting a proper thrashing even though England have got several players out. Even if Murali plays a blinder our batsmen are still useless in playing in bouncy pitches.
I think you are wrong as Warne almost won the Ashes of his own back, but Flintoff did slightly better, i agree no other player can win the series for Sri Lanka but i do think Murali can.
I've seen how he can desimate a batting line-up, he single handedly destroyed the whole Australia betting line up in a memorable innings. It can happen and it will happen again.
An article about the selectors being worried about Flintoff's workload
http://content-aus.cricinfo.com/ci/content/current/story/246027.html
 
heffa said:
I think you are wrong as Warne almost won the Ashes of his own back, but Flintoff did slightly better, i agree no other player can win the series for Sri Lanka but i do think Murali can.
I've seen how he can desimate a batting line-up, he single handedly destroyed the whole Australia betting line up in a memorable innings. It can happen and it will happen again.
An article about the selectors being worried about Flintoff's workload
http://content-aus.cricinfo.com/ci/content/current/story/246027.html

I really hope it happens as it would be a great achievement to win in England but I can't see it happening. We might have a chance though if our top order batsmen do well.
 
heffa said:
I think you are wrong as Warne almost won the Ashes of his own back, but Flintoff did slightly better, i agree no other player can win the series for Sri Lanka but i do think Murali can.
I've seen how he can desimate a batting line-up, he single handedly destroyed the whole Australia betting line up in a memorable innings. It can happen and it will happen again.
An article about the selectors being worried about Flintoff's workload
http://content-aus.cricinfo.com/ci/content/current/story/246027.html

Warne has always found favour on English pitches, better than most spinners. He did unbelievable damage last year, more than he has perhaps ever inflicted us on previous successful tours. But we still managed to win because our performance level man for man was greater than Australia's.

Murali can do similar damage of course, but I think it will be too much for just him. Obviously out bowling options are considerably weakened, but Hoggard and Flintoff will cause damage, and I expect Plunkett and Mahmood to perform well if both get a chance. Indeed, it looks like Mahmood is being groomed to be Harmison's long-term stand-in/replacement.
 
Dowders_Jnr said:
Warne has always found favour on English pitches, better than most spinners. He did unbelievable damage last year, more than he has perhaps ever inflicted us on previous successful tours. But we still managed to win because our performance level man for man was greater than Australia's.
If it wasn't for Flintoff you would of lost the series end of. We also would of won with Mcgrath in the side for the whole series.
 
England had the better of every test except the first one.
 
heffa said:
If it wasn't for Flintoff you would of lost the series end of. We also would of won with Mcgrath in the side for the whole series.

And it begins...

If it wasn't for Warne, Australia may well have lost 3 or 4-1.

If McGrath had've been available the series may have been different.

It's completely pointless going over the ifs and buts. England outplayed Australia.

Let us carry on.
 
heffa said:
If it wasn't for Flintoff you would of lost the series end of. We also would of won with Mcgrath in the side for the whole series.

If's, but's and maybe's....the fact is, your batting order didn't show up and you never posted an inning's score of 400+, whereas we did on multiple occasions. Stop crying and look forward to November, then we'll see if Hayden doesn't shit himself again against Simon Jones.
 
Dowders_Jnr said:
If's, but's and maybe's....the fact is, your batting order didn't show up and you never posted an inning's score of 400+, whereas we did on multiple occasions. Stop crying and look forward to November, then we'll see if Hayden doesn't shit himself again against Simon Jones.
The fact is it won't happen again, you won't win the series in Australia lightening doesn't strike the same place twice.
 
heffa said:
The fact is it won't happen again, you won't win the series in Australia lightening doesn't strike the same place twice.

Erm, yes it does.
 
I think Mahmood looks promising, not keen on Plunkett though but i suppose i would play him for his batting skills at eight since I would rather play Panesar than Udal as the spinner.