TheGame
Full Member
Really need a partnership here.
What did he do?
I'd say we're unlikely to chase down 200 here.Really need a partnership here.
I'd say we're unlikely to chase down 200 here.
You watch a day like this and wonder how Sibley is going to get a big score if he struggled to score so much on a day when pretty much everyone else has scored at a decent rate
Shushing Bairstow
Big wicket with the new ball. England effectively 186/7. Anything below 250 and India should be favorites.
Looking at the forecast the morning session looks in doubt. Heading towards a draw if England play out the overs tonight.
All out now. Good chance of a result.Looking at the forecast the morning session looks in doubt. Heading towards a draw if England play out the overs tonight.
Shushing Bairstow
If Rahul makes it tomorrow he will have batted on all five days of a test. Incredible stat, can anyone recall when it's happened before?
ML Jaisimha Vs Australia, 1960
Sir Geoffrey Boycott Vs Australia, 1977
Kim Hughes Vs England, 1980
Allan Lamb Vs West Indies, 1984
Ravi Shastri Vs England, 1984
Adrian Griffith Vs New Zealand, 1999
Andrew Flintoff Vs India, 2006
Alviro Peterson Vs New Zealand, 2012
Cheteshwar Pujara Vs Sri Lanka, 2017
Rory Burns Vs Australia, 2019
I’ll give you that wicket.If Rahul makes it tomorrow he will have batted on all five days of a test. Incredible stat, can anyone recall when it's happened before?
I've probably just jinxed him.
I’ll give you that wicket.
Agree. Give Siraj and JB the new ball and bring Kumar on first change.Shamis not the bowler for English test conditions. Get BK in
What’s the weather prediction for day 5? I think there’s going to be a bit of a twist in the tale on day 5 and it won’t be as easy for India (weather permitting of course)
Yeah it does feel like that flurry of runs was crucial. Really eaten into the target.They were saying rain in the first session, but it doesn’t really say that on my weather app. It shows small showers in the afternoon. Plenty of time for India to score 150 runs at the rate they score at.
I think the damage was done last night and India managed to take the small chance of an England win out of the equation.
You watch a day like this and wonder how Sibley is going to get a big score if he struggled to score so much on a day when pretty much everyone else has scored at a decent rate
I was thinking about this and looked up some numbers. Given his strike rate is usually around 25-30, then he would need to face about 150+ balls per innings on average to get a reasonable average. That's a huge number of balls, and there's always going to be the occasional ball that is unplayable, or a poor shot choice like yesterday.
The most runs faced per innings on average by anyone who played in the last 20 years was Dravid, at either 112 or 123 depending on what source you believe. Very few players faced more than 100 on average and a lot of all time greats faced less than 100. So Sibley, at his strike rate, would essentially need to be best defensive player of all time, to get even a half decent average. That's never going to happen, so he needs to get back to County and in the nets and add a few more shots to his game.
That sort of player is OK in test cricket, but you have to stay in for days. A certain someone made a decent career out of it.
Yeah, if he could average even 35 runs then Sibley would be very useful for us, especially as we have an attacking batting lineup and nobody who can play the new ball well. However an average of 35 would need Sibley to face about 140-160 balls an innings, and that ain't happening. Boycott faced 122 balls on average, and averaged 47 runs.
Sibley makes Boycott look like Sehwag.
Yeah, if he could average even 35 runs then Sibley would be very useful for us, especially as we have an attacking batting lineup and nobody who can play the new ball well. However an average of 35 would need Sibley to face about 140-160 balls an innings, and that ain't happening. Boycott faced 122 on average.
Where are you getting those numbers from? Sibley's SR is 35 so he'd 'only' need to play 100 balls for 35 runs.