TrustInJanuzaj
'Liverpool are a proper club'
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2015
- Messages
- 11,347
Only a Chelsea fan could think Chilwell should start over Shaw.
To reach Semis- you'd have to beat 2nd placed team from France's group in Ro16, most likely have to beat Spain.
Honestly, I hope England does well, and I do think you can beat Portugal. But I think having looked at Spain the other day, they are technically way too superior to you and your defence is pretty average
It's not even particularly close.Shaw has been far and away the best left back this season.
He was part of a team that won the CL. That team isnt playing in the euros funnily enough and neither do we have the same manager. Overall Shaw is the better player...so he plays over Chilwell.And he isn't. He literally just said the reason England won win is cause they'd play players like chillwell.
Chilwell who just won the cl just over a week ago. Make sense of that one for me.
Not as strong as their successful sides, but they absolutely battered Portugal. Had Morata been slightly less Werner-esque, they'd have won by a 2 or 3 goal margin.Not the strongest Spain side though?
If we play five at back, I would have both Shaw and Chillwell. Chillwell as LB and Shaw as LCB.
The formation he played in will likely be used. Something he's far more used to.He was part of a team that won the CL. That team isnt playing in the euros funnily enough and neither do we have the same manager. Overall Shaw is the better player...so he plays over Chilwell.
Loses too much height.Exactly this. The thought of Mings on the left of a three man defence is terrifying.
If we go five then it has to be James, Walker, Stones, Shaw and Chilwell. Full back galore but it’s full of talent.
Loses too much height.
Even mings should be fine with rice babysitting right in front of him.Perhaps. But I’ll remind you that the alternative is Mings being eaten alive on the touchline.
With the attacking talent in the squad yet everyone thinks he's going to a back 5 and probably drop one of our better players to incorporate walker at rcb. Thats idiotic, Southgate is a shit house who cares about not losing more than winning. It'll show in this tournament too and then he'll hopefully he'll be sacked.Not really. Obviously I don't agree with him all the time just like most fans but he is not an idiot.
Better to lose height than include an absolute liability at the back.Loses too much height.
Ah right, got ya. So Tammy starts over Kane?Yeah. Southgate better not play him either.
why do you talk like a child/Donald TrumpLmfao yeah OK.
Hes a loser. You just said you want England to WIN so you play the players that WIN
I think its possible we could beat a good team like that. I think we have enough talent. But I dont rate Southgate and his tactics or selection, so getting the best of the players isnt what I expect. Maybe for 1 big match, but not for the whole tournament
Hes not gonna play a back 3 with 2 of them being cbs.Better to lose height than include an absolute liability at the back.
Without? Yeh I agree which is why he would have been better firstly throwing away the shite 3 at the back but failing that putting in either white or Coady and having Shaw as the left CB.Hes not gonna play a back 3 with 2 of them being cbs.
Formation and tactics are 2 different things. The team will play completely different to Chelsea so it may as well be a different formation too. Wont make a difference regardless. Shaw is the better player and he will start ahead of him.The formation he played in will likely be used. Something he's far more used to.
Shit 2 fullbacks my bad.Without? Yeh I agree which is why he would have been better firstly throwing away the shite 3 at the back but failing that putting in either white or Coady and having Shaw as the left CB.
Coady is still a far better player than Mings.Shit 2 fullbacks my bad.
One will be stones
Walker played rcb last time will do the same this time. Coady is a nothing player. So it's either mings or white.
Yet he was the most dangerous attacker in that first half. Are you sure you are watching the same game?
How good are Ingerland
I’m not even Rashfords biggest fan but he looked sharp in the first half. Even Dixon said that and he couldn’t spot his reflection in the mirror. I thought he got worse second half but still carried a general threat.The most dangerous attacker and yet not involved in the two occasions hit the bar. Also gave the ball away on numerous occasions. Sancho wasn't much better tbf but Rashford, just like for us, just routinely dribbles into traffic and loses the ball in dangerous positions. It's like clockwork. Yes he does occasionally make things happen but he is such a liability.
It's been a year mate let's move on shall we?
That's what concerns me is that when he's 'looking sharp' he still sparks opposition counter attack. He's not a bad player, he has all the tools and makes stuff happen and he brings unpredictability. He deserves to be in the squad. I just cannot fathom how he could be starting though.I’m not even Rashfords biggest fan but he looked sharp in the first half. Even Dixon said that and he couldn’t spot his reflection in the mirror. I thought he got worse second half but still carried a general threat.
That's what concerns me is that when he's 'looking sharp' he still sparks opposition counter attack. He's not a bad player, he has all the tools and makes stuff happen and he brings unpredictability. He deserves to be in the squad. I just cannot fathom how he could be starting though.
What a good job we did on that front in the last 12 months.Thank goodness we permanently sorted racism out so easily so we can move on.
1 goal in his last 10 for United, overplayed, carrying an injury, and in poor form. Bench option for me, because he can do things others can't, so could be useful, but should not start over Foden, for example.
Reckon you will find most England fans agree with me.
Think someone said earlier it was 4 goals in his last 22 Premier League games. Started off like a house on fire but he's been struggling for more than half a season. He should be benched as there are better options and he will perform better against tired legs.How many of those 10 games was he shunted to the right side where he clearly can’t play to a high level?
Not excusing his form by the way, it’s clear he’s been off it a bit the Europa final says it all but some people are acting like he’s scored 3 goals all season and has been terrible, it’s only the past 4-5 weeks of the season he dropped off and that was clearly down to fitness.
Already looked better today after getting a bit of time off, he’s got another week now before the first England game he should be ok.
Why should they be darkhorses?Not as strong as their successful sides, but they absolutely battered Portugal. Had Morata been slightly less Werner-esque, they'd have won by a 2 or 3 goal margin.
Their defence is still pretty good, have among the best midfields (underrated if we're being honest) and if they start Moreno instead of Morata, I'd fancy them to be the dark horses for the tournament
Shaw is a better full back than Chilwell, I hope they pick the latter though.
There are two forwards in the England squad that have real direct pace that can stretch defences and open space for other attackers. Rashford is one of them. If neither he or Sterling start then you end up with a lot of players that like to come towards the ball which enables the opposition defence to be more compact and contain England's players more easily.
I take your point I would go with Sterling though. He just keeps the ball better. We need to build up pressure for defences to crack. Rashford for all his great attributes does seem to be an expert at releasing the pressure on opponents. He will make up for it with a key pass or something but you can get the same or similar quality from another player who is less likely to be the link that comes unstuck.There are two forwards in the England squad that have real direct pace that can stretch defences and open space for other attackers. Rashford is one of them. If neither he or Sterling start then you end up with a lot of players that like to come towards the ball which enables the opposition defence to be more compact and contain England's players more easily.
Why should they be darkhorses?
They are easily a top 5 team for this tournament, if not top 3. Their midfield is certainly one of the best in the competition, last 10 years at Euro under 21 level they have been the most consistent team in Europe, maybe only Germany has been as consistent as them.
I have been reading a lot of comments saying because they don't have Villa, Xavi or Iniesta they have a crap team, clearly some people are getting hyped up by big name players and don't pay attention to how any youth team from Spain works until the senior level, it's not because they didn't performed recently at top level on recent tournaments they are a weak team.
By the way their under 21 team did the same to Portugal the previous day, only difference was this time we had the luck to score with a own goal. Since the last World Cup the teams I saw playing against us who their midfield impressed me the most was at Italy on the first half, and Spain during 60 minutes, ok France with different type of play also, but if you have top level players on the midfield you control the majority of the games, scoring or winning is another matter, but they have no reason to fear no one.
Also think Germany will show up with the Bayern players dynamics.