More like his Sillicon valley customers might think twice before buying Tesla. Tesla itself is run very differently that places like Google where employee activism targets their own company.Division and hate Obvious troll.
Edit: I dont see many of his Tesla and especially SpaceX employess taking kindly to this, trolling or not.
I don't really know the personality of Musk or much about US politics (if this makes him right wing) but interesting comments by him. I think he's been slighlty changing his stance as he's had a few political battles recently - covid locking down a gigafactory, avoiding tax issue, Biden mentioning Ford and GM but not Tesla, and his negative comments about build back better (not worth it) and the money printing leading to inflation. I wouldn't know but I suspect Biden and co are going to get slammed in the next election. Then again are they going to vote for Trump......
Anyway, he's doing some major trolling at the moment and it isn't a good look for him or the Tesla stock. He always has an agenda, when he did the Twitter poll about whether he should pay tax, he knew he had options expiring and it would be a taxable event as the SEC filings showed.
I saw Tesla was removed from an S&P ESG fund today even though the big oil companies are in - some funny things going on.
Yup, the big one being the bedrock for horrendous low paid working conditions in indo China. Sorry I see a lot of similarities between Jobs and Elon. Two blowhards who have somehow convinced everyone its all down to them and their genius and not the fact they purchased or hired or stole from others. I wish everyone would stop with this right vs left wing BS. Being right or left doesn't make you a bad person and we're all pretty much central anyway. It all needs to be framed as greedy rich and the people they pay vs everyone else. This class war has been going for decades and god we're losing badly.I can understand if it is someone like Steve Jobs where his company actually created products that brought about major changes to the majority of the world.
Yup, the big one being the bedrock for horrendous low paid working conditions in indo China. Sorry I see a lot of similarities between Jobs and Elon. Two blowhards who have somehow convinced everyone its all down to them and their genius and not the fact they purchased or hired or stole from others. I wish everyone would stop with this right vs left wing BS. Being right or left doesn't make you a bad person and we're all pretty much central anyway. It all needs to be framed as greedy rich and the people they pay vs everyone else. This class war has been going for decades and god we're losing badly.
Correct on the wrong thread so I won't go into it to much. You're talking about the US Parties, neither of which I consider any wing anymore ( there is no left wing option), its just hucksters playing a role to benefit their own bank accounts. Yes one group is clearly defined in their want of power and corruption while the other side are better at hiding it. I'm talking about people in general. The way we label each other and that then defines them and their intentions which then makes it so they walk into an automatic support group which we're all part of( yay he's one of us how dare you others criticise us, we're against you because your there and we're here etc etc). When if we dropped all that and just labelled them as greedy rich vs not greedy.Wrong thread for it, but I detest this narrative. It’s only one side trying to roll back the basic rights of minorities and trying to overthrow their own democracy ffs. (We’re talking right vs left in a US context here, otherwise you need to specify).
I think hiding the fact it’s really the rich against the poor is the entire point and why the rich pay for political theater.Correct on the wrong thread so I won't go into it to much. You're talking about the US Parties, neither of which I consider any wing anymore ( there is no left wing option), its just hucksters playing a role to benefit their own bank accounts. Yes one group is clearly defined in their want of power and corruption while the other side are better at hiding it. I'm talking about people in general. The way we label each other and that then defines them and their intentions which then makes it so they walk into an automatic support group which we're all part of( yay he's one of us how dare you others criticise us, we're against you because your there and we're here etc etc). When if we dropped all that and just labelled them as greedy rich vs not greedy.
We can use the term Republican voter for calling people cnuts if that's ok.Being right or left doesn't make you a bad person and we're all pretty much central anyway.
To be fair, an auto correct that changes cnut to Republican voter would be superWe can use the term Republican voter for calling people cnuts if that's ok.
Zidane be like 'I know what's up here but how do I obfuscate as much as possible by being eloquent and not getting into an argument'
Working (successfully) on two problems that no one else dared to. His two big current companies (Tesla and SpaceX) have significantly changed the dynamics in those two industries. At this stage, the change of the entire car industry to electric cars is inevitable, thanks to the work of Tesla.Always struck me as someone who has an inflated ego and thought himself to be some genius polymath - which he is not. Some of his supporters on twitter are like cult followers. Something that I can never understand, what did he do that elevate his status so much? I can understand if it is someone like Steve Jobs where his company actually created products that brought about major changes to the majority of the world.
Edison was also a massive thief of ideas he took credit for who is now romanticised.* Steve Jobs was also a pretty bad guy, and in his first 2 decades of impact, Bill Gates was pretty bad too.
** Before I get attacked, I am not comparing him with those guys. He is an entrepreneur with some good technical basis, more similar to the likes of Gates or Page/Brin (although they were technically far stronger). Or if you want to go back in time, comparable to the likes of Carnegie or Rockefeller. Many compare him to Edison but that is stupid considering that Edison was a great scientist in addition to a great entrepreneur.
So around 50% of the USA are cnuts then.We can use the term Republican voter for calling people cnuts if that's ok.
I like to be more optimistic and only count the cnuts that actually voted for Donny as a proportion of the entire population: roughly 74m cnuts out of roughly 330m people that's only slightly over 20% of cnuts. It's not great, but could be worse.So around 50% of the USA are cnuts then.
So around 50% of the USA are cnuts then.
I may be mistaken but aren't Democrats the demographic that would most likely buy Tesla products? If so, quite odd for Musk to finally come out of the right wing closet at a time the stock price has already tanked.
Can anyone in this thread have a measured take on anything related to MuskAnd who drives Teslas anyway. Pieces of absolute trash.
Whataboutism is a dangerous thing.Working (successfully) on two problems that no one else dared to. His two big current companies (Tesla and SpaceX) have significantly changed the dynamics in those two industries. At this stage, the change of the entire car industry to electric cars is inevitable, thanks to the work of Tesla.
If Tesla dies because Elon has lost it in the last couple of years, I wouldn't care a bit. The industry has changed for the good, and even without Tesla we will see the paradigm shift. Also, regardless of what happens from now on, Elon Musk has cemented his status as one of the greatest entrepreneurs of his time.
Now, that he is a narcissist dickhead, that is nothing new, and signs were there all the time, especially after the 'pedo' comments. Of course, that does not make his achievements in those two companies (and others like PayPal) lesser. The likes of Pearson and Fisher were total racists (and massive supporters of eugenics), but essentially created the field of statistics. Schrodinger was a pedophile but also one of the greatest physicists ever. And Elon Musk * is a narcissist dickhead with some very bizarre, if not downright evil views, but also a great entrepreneur. Bad people can do good works that advance the civilization **.
* Steve Jobs was also a pretty bad guy, and in his first 2 decades of impact, Bill Gates was pretty bad too.
** Before I get attacked, I am not comparing him with those guys. He is an entrepreneur with some good technical basis, more similar to the likes of Gates or Page/Brin (although they were technically far stronger). Or if you want to go back in time, comparable to the likes of Carnegie or Rockefeller. Many compare him to Edison but that is stupid considering that Edison was a great scientist in addition to a great entrepreneur.
I wouldn't even say it is whataboutism. A person can clearly be a cnut and also great at what he does. In the case of Musk (who is a dickhead although recently has been more blatant), he is great at building innovative companies that try to solve really hard problems.Whataboutism is a dangerous thing.
It's not really though. If you are trying to weigh someone's reputation, then you have to consider all the elements.Whataboutism is a dangerous thing.
I wouldn't even say it is whataboutism. A person can clearly be a cnut and also great at what he does. In the case of Musk (who is a dickhead although recently has been more blatant), he is great at building innovative companies that try to solve really hard problems.
Hasn't it been obvious for a quite a time that he's a proper right wing narcissist? His statement doesn't come much to a surprise. A complete lunatic that guy.
And who drives Teslas anyway. Pieces of absolute trash.
Isn't that only true in the US?That would be the majority of electric vehicle owners.
Isn't that only true in the US?
The majority of cars there aren't Teslas though. I know I'm being pedantic.As of the first quarter of this year, the Model Y alone has apparently dwarfed the competition.
The majority of cars there aren't Teslas though. I know I'm being pedantic.
14 % of the market share is not a majority. That means 86 % of EV owners drive something else than Tesla.Nor are they all electric (the Chinese brand numbers for example are a mix of EV and Hybrid). If you go EV only Tesla should be well on top. In terms of actual global market share (not units sold last quarter) Tesla is at about 14%, VW are about 2-3% behind them.
He barely has any competition and even then he can’t manufacture cars fast enough. the cost of them also makes it’s out of reach for majority of the population.As of the first quarter of this year, the Model Y alone has apparently dwarfed the competition.
It’s also mostly in California. Nobody buys his cars because they are too expensive and take forever to arrive once you place an order.Isn't that only true in the US?
He barely has any competition and even then he can’t manufacture cars fast enough. the cost of them also makes it’s out of reach for majority of the population.
14 % of the market share is not a majority. That means 86 % of EV owners drive something else than Tesla.