No, it's not and it has been explained to you before. Let me make this really simple.
You claim that people don't like Twitter now because people they don't like (like neo-nazis) are not banned now while before Twitter banned people that they agreed with being banned therefore "hypocrisy." What you are missing is that people are not saying its worse because of this alleged subjective disagreement. They are saying it's worse because entire processes have changed or been removed and replaced and the result of those process changes is an objectively worse product.
- Before, the process, while not perfect, was that violations of certain rules and guidelines developed by quality control teams, legal teams, etc led to clearly defined guidelines for bans. Now, there doesn't appear to be any actual process other than Musk's personal whims. Musk gets offended about elonjet so he bans it and bans journalists even talking about elonjet. Then, he makes up a story that has been proven to be misleading at best or outright lying at worst to cover it up, has to backtrack and do a lot of compensation.
- Another example is how he decided to charge money for blue check marks on a whim without due diligence, then a bunch of issues with that arise because it missed the point of checkmarks to begin with and there were tons of impersonations so then he has to rush out changes and new rules and additional checkmarks now. It's a huge mess.
- Yet another example is Elon (not a coding expert btw) deciding the app is too bloated so he just orders a change on a whim and...ends up breaking two-factor authentication and preventing people from even accessing the app.
All of these examples (and plenty more)
objectively make the app worse than it was before and we aren't even talking about neo-nazis yet. Everyone who has worked around tech for a while knows what elon has been doing is exactly the type of cowboy shit that accumulates tech debt and always leads to objectively worse end results.