George Owen
LEAVE THE SFW THREAD ALONE!!1!
The replies
such good. very project.
Basically the cryptocurrency thread.
The replies
such good. very project.
Interesting
It's basically pointless looking at the replies to any relatively big account now. Mindless bots everywhere.
Do you think it's just to drive engagement? There's hundreds of them under every reply.
If it's to do that I wonder if it's Elon wanting to boost the site numbers or the actual accounts posting the tweets.
I think it's pretty well-known that you can buy engagement on Social Media sites, like followers on Instagram for example. Wouldn't be too hard to imagine that either Michael Owen or the company behind the latest snake-oil he is trying to sell is trying to pump the numbers up to make it look more valid than it is.
But surely everyone can see through how bollocks those replies are.
Satire is now being surpassed by reality.
!!The replies
such good. very project.
Yes, it's a very very stupid tactic.But surely everyone can see through how bollocks those replies are.
All his firms are state sponsored.My wife came across this article:
https://thepointmag.com/criticism/very-ordinary-men/
Long, yes, but apart from being a brilliant review of the inanity of the Musk biography in question, it's also a great portrayal (no, not positive) of Musk himself. Well, I suppose it's nothing new for most people in this thread, but I thought this interesting - especially the bit about how Tesla made money through California's ZEV scheme.
Yeah, it's pointed out for SpaceX as well: they're a low-cost service provider for NASA, not some science fiction lovers' dream. Nothing visionary going on, except maybe in terms of where there's money to be made.All his firms are state sponsored.
Yeah, it's pointed out for SpaceX as well: they're a low-cost service provider for NASA, not some science fiction lovers' dream. Nothing visionary going on, except maybe in terms of where there's money to be made.
Yeah, sorry, I was too narrow. The point remains, though, that they're not some visionary company that will change history, but more like a contractor - although obviously in a rather special branch of industry.SpaceX definitely wouldn't exist without NASA, and the early investment is the only reason they exist so that's true to an extent. It's a long time since then though, and NASA are a miniscule fraction of flights for Falcon now. I'd guess 5 or 6 a year out of hundreds of commercial launches over the last couple of years.
Yeah, sorry, I was too narrow. The point remains, though, that they're not some visionary company that will change history, but more like a contractor - although obviously in a rather special branch of industry.
Are you not seriously tempted to delete your account? How bad does the site need to get before you'd consider it?
My personal experience of quitting Twitter was a powerful feeling of "why the feck did I not do that sooner?!?"
Do you really think investors/CEOs of big companies actually worked in a lab to create the innovations they sell?
Of course not. The problem is that some people seem to think that they do.
Elon hasn't created anything, yet he has a cult following that treats him as some innovative genius. He's no more of a genius than any other successful venture capitalist.
I wonder what the ven diagram of Steve Jobs worshippers and Elon Musk worshippers would look like?
That's fair. Musk is a complete tool, and it's interesting that SpaceX is the company he is most disassociated from publicly as it's probably the one he least understands.
They have become a bit of a monopoly in the industry for now (which may be an issue) and bringing costs down is a big step when it hadn't been done for 60 years. Space is not easy, Boeing and Lockheed are being paid billions more than SpaceX and have produced far less. Blue Origin have got similar money from NASA and are nowhere.
It's absolutely nothing to do with Musk, and is because of people like Tom Meuller and Gwynne Shotwell. Because of them launches have gone from once every 12 months or so to every 2 or 3 days. That is pretty impressive to do within a decade after 60 years of other agencies getting nowhere near that.
Amazing
He went to Auschwitz, so now he's earned the right to again amplify far-right Twitter accounts.
I bet he had loads of ideas on streamlining and efficiency.Can't help but suspect he went to Auschwitz for reasons different to those most people visit Auschwitz.
It gets worse.
Not just "concerning", but "extremely concerning".
Similar to how Fascism appealed to elements of the right-wing in the 30s I imagine. If it wasn't for the fact the UK and America had just been involved in one of the most brutal wars in history against Germany, I wonder how much more popular Fascism and Hitler would have been in each country.
Next you're going to tell me that support for ukraine is not to defend democracy and the free western way of life.Nobody minded Hitler's Fascism, it was the threat of invasion that they didn't like.
America was segregated and Britain and Europe had had the world subjugated and had killed millions. WW2 was never a war of ideologies except with the Soviets.