I’m assuming the replies are revealing
Not with that attitude, that's for sure.But he can’t because he’s not born in the states
I don’t know but it would open up avenues for the democrats too. Personally I don’t think Joe blogs would like having the country run by a non-American bornNot with that attitude, that's for sure.
But more seriously, how difficult would it be to change that rule?
It's definitely not easy because it's in the constitution. That means three quarters of the states approving it I think.Not with that attitude, that's for sure.
But more seriously, how difficult would it be to change that rule?
You can be born overseas as long as you are American. John McCain was born in Panama I think.But he can’t because he’s not born in the states
2/3 of both houses, then 3/4 of state legislatures.It's definitely not easy because it's in the constitution. That means three quarters of the states approving it I think.
And Ted Cruz in Canada. Just need 1 US parent.You can be born overseas as long as you are American. John McCain was born in Panama I think.
He was born in the Panama Canal Zone, which was a US territory.You can be born overseas as long as you are American. John McCain was born in Panama I think.
Got it. Annex South Africa.He was born in the Panama Canal Zone, which was a US territory.
Anyway, Elon is not eligible as he was born in South Africa.
I mean, the Republicans would probably find a way to allow him to become president anyway.Got it. Annex South Africa.
He was born in South Africa, his dad is South African and his mum is CanadianYou can be born overseas as long as you are American. John McCain was born in Panama I think.
They have no spine at all and their convictions mean nothing to them. Otherwise they would act on them.“might not”. I mean, come on. I will never not find it utterly bizarre how many times I read that Twitter is an absolutely terrible place. From people posting on Twitter.
I know it’s cruel but I’d love someone to feck with this person somehow (the guy, not the abused lady).They have no spine at all and their convictions mean nothing to them. Otherwise they would act on them.
I know it’s cruel but I’d love someone to feck with this person somehow (the guy, not the abused lady).
I agree. And she pays for it too given her ‘verified’ badge.“might not”. I mean, come on. I will never not find it utterly bizarre how many times I read that Twitter is an absolutely terrible place. From people posting on Twitter.
I know what this place is like.Love that you had to add the clarification in brackets
And that pisses me really off. Because it’s such an easy thing to do. It’s literally just a few clicks. Done within a minute. And they don’t even take their believes seriously enough to do that.I agree. And she pays for it too given her ‘verified’ badge.
I don’t disagree with her point but if she doesn’t act on it, what’s the point in posturing.
That’s true, to be fair.You are kidding yourselves if you don't think social media users are addicted to the social media they use. Took most of guys years to come off twitter yourselves too.
I'm not sure anyone suggested this isn't the case. Addiction and/or income generation surely explain 90% of these cases.You are kidding yourselves if you don't think social media users are addicted to the social media they use. Took most of guys years to come off twitter yourselves too.
This doesn't prove what you think it does.Tesla hits $1 trillion market cap as stock rallies after Trump win
Oh but the media told us that Elon Musk’s $44 billion Twitter purchase ranks as worst deal since the financial crisis!
In retrospect, it was a fecking bargain
Is this your first time reading his post?This doesn't prove what you think it does.
Apparently so. I seem to remember the name from the past but sounds like I probably should expect no different then.Is this your first time reading his post?
This doesn't prove what you think it does.
If the stock price of Nestle surges because a natural disaster is on its way that makes people stock up on water - are you going to imply Nestle is just a company with a genius at the top?
If Nestle is the one causing the natural disaster yes, business wise
You can't equate a natural disaster that is not controllable, than voluntarily (or being forced because of being a babbler mouth) purchasing a tool (twitter) that helps pushing all your other assets. If that tool costs you 44 billion but it indirectly creates an increase of 100 billions, that tool has been a great tool and a net benefit independently if now the tool wore of and its only worth 4 billion.
We don't know if twitter had been instrumental of Trump being the president again, we can't quantify it, but certainly I am sure that is instrumental on how close Trump and Musk had become. Without twitter, Musk most likely would never been on the good side of Trump (he was on the bad side actually) as he sees twitter utility. And being on the good side of Trump, surely will prop the value of Tesla and SpaceX and any other Musk companies. Probably at a personal wealth level.
We don't know how much it affects, and by how much. But it all indicates that surely Musk will benefit more than 44 billions that twitter costed
We can laugh, we can curse, but the evil cnut is winning economically and influence speaking
This doesn't prove what you think it does.
If the stock price of Nestle surges because a natural disaster is on its way that makes people stock up on water - are you going to imply Nestle is just a company with a genius at the top?
That's a bit of a goofy example, but hey, I’m in a generous mood, so let me break it down for you—consider it a favor because I think you're alright.
For those looking for the SparkNotes version: Musk buying Twitter played a part in unseating Biden, thus removing the regulatory capture on Tesla, shooting the stock up which makes the Twitter purchase a bargain.
Biden unseated Biden. Trump won because of inflation and climate change/wars and their effect on immigration. All of this would have happened without Musk buying Twitter. He could have saved himself billions without that stupid vanity fuelled play. Only an idiot would think you need to own Twitter to use Twitter for political ends.
Biden unseated Biden. Trump won because of inflation and climate change/wars and their effect on immigration. All of this would have happened without Musk buying Twitter. He could have saved himself billions without that stupid vanity fuelled play. Only an idiot would think you need to own Twitter to use Twitter for political ends.
He won the election for Trump. Just by allowing Trump back on Twitter and not censoring stories Dems wanted to block and would have before. But thanks for your perspective.
He won the election for Trump. Just by allowing Trump back on Twitter and not censoring stories Dems wanted to block and would have before. But thanks for your perspective.