Telsim
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2021
- Messages
- 5,812
Unavailable once again. What even is his injury or is it just an excuse?
Not to be contrary, but why? He's shown basically nothing to imply he's worth a start and he's clearly boy showing enough in training. Why would we want to start him?
Probably because Donny dominating a team from Cyprus wouldn't tell us a lot.I come from the school of thought that believes that if you’re going to spend 40m plus 125k/week on a player, you give that player a chance to prove himself on the pitch. There is nothing a player can prove when he only comes on in the 85th minute once a month.
But my point is broader than that. Bruno is an excellent attacking midfielder in a counterattacking mode, but much less so when we dominate possession. We’re facing a side on Thursday that we should destroy with possession and scoring chances. Donny should start in Bruno’s place (and Fred for Eriksen and Casemiro for McTominay, btw) and be given a chance to prove everyone here right that the only thing Donny excels at is shitting his pants. If he does shit his pants against a side from Cyprus then there we have it and we offload him in January as most here wish. But what if, should he be given a start at least against a lowly Cypriot side, he puts in a commanding performance? What would be the harm in finding out we actually, against all expectations, find out that we have a decent footballer in Donny Van De Beek?
£54m. Amad was only £19m, with about the same in add-ons which I highly doubt have been activated yet. It's not that big a fee and there's still time for him to be well worth it.Yeah we truly pissed around £70m up the wall on him & Amad, that could have gone towards another CM or a ST but no we are clueless
Probably because Donny dominating a team from Cyprus wouldn't tell us a lot.
You've said it yourself, we should be dominating the game, we are expected to be commanding and are clear favourites to win the game.
Donny would therefore be expected to dominate, so by him achieving that we wouldn't have gained anything from it, other than he can perform against relative minnows.
If indeed he did perform poorly, as he has done numerous times previously, then that wouldn't look to favourably upon him.
But the thing you are missing here is the reason he only gets fleeting moments.True, if Donny can't dominate a team from Cyprus then he must be jettisoned for a smaller club, perhaps in Italy or France. But if he can dominate a team from Cyprus then there's at least hope he can be useful against the West Hams and Villas of the world.
We've got a bit of a problem, which is that we tend to overplay certain players even when they're clearly fatigued or unfit and our collective final third performances suffer as a result. This is particularly true of Bruno, whom we've run into the ground over the last 18 months or so. (It's also true of Rashford and Maguire, although the issue with those two is that Ole rushed them back far too soon from injury and they sufferered mentally as a result.) It's early in the season and Bruno shouldn't be suffering from fatigue, and of course we had the long delay between matches, but if we play him twice a week through the end of the season we're only fukking ourselves as the season progresses and we elevate the risk of losing Bruno for must-win games in March and April.
But going back to Donny, surely it must be acknowledged that no player can perform to whatever their potential is -- whatever it may be -- if he's only brought on in the 85th minute once a month. If he shits his pants against Omania then we will know for all time that there is no hope for him at Old Trafford. But if he acquits himself well then maybe we can bring him on against clubs like West Ham and Villa and if he shits his pants against them then we can move him on to a club in Italy or France. But what if he performs well against clubs like West Ham and Villa? Now we have an option to work with should something happen to Bruno. Yes, we already have Eriksen but he's worked out quite nicely for us in a deeper role.
The player has to give the manager a reason to play him. ETH isn't just going to say 'I should give him a game because we spent s lot of money on him, regardless of the fact that I'm seeing nothing in training to justify it's, is he? The fact is that manager after manager has deemed him not up to it. If that's the case I don't want him played for the sake of it, regardless of who the opposition is.I come from the school of thought that believes that if you’re going to spend 40m plus 125k/week on a player, you give that player a chance to prove himself on the pitch. There is nothing a player can prove when he only comes on in the 85th minute once a month.
But my point is broader than that. Bruno is an excellent attacking midfielder in a counterattacking mode, but much less so when we dominate possession. We’re facing a side on Thursday that we should destroy with possession and scoring chances. Donny should start in Bruno’s place (and Fred for Eriksen and Casemiro for McTominay, btw) and be given a chance to prove everyone here right that the only thing Donny excels at is shitting his pants. If he does shit his pants against a side from Cyprus then there we have it and we offload him in January as most here wish. But what if, should he be given a start at least against a lowly Cypriot side, he puts in a commanding performance? What would be the harm in finding out we actually, against all expectations, find out that we have a decent footballer in Donny Van De Beek?
Sell him to Ajax in January
Then the solution is to sell him, no? Don't understand why we've held onto him for so long if it was obvious right away to management that he wasn't good enough.The player has to give the manager a reason to play him. ETH isn't just going to say 'I should give him a game because we spent s lot of money on him, regardless of the fact that I'm seeing nothing in training to justify it's, is he? The fact is that manager after manager has deemed him not up to it. If that's the case I don't want him played for the sake of it, regardless of who the opposition is.
Agreed, he should have been gone a long time ago.Then the solution is to sell him, no? Don't understand why we've held onto him for so long if it was obvious right away to management that he wasn't good enough.
I always thought Amad fees was reportedly 25m +15m add-ons at that time, but it could be on Euros.£54m. Amad was only £19m, with about the same in add-ons which I highly doubt have been activated yet. It's not that big a fee and there's still time for him to be well worth it.
VDB's £35m was obviously more of a waste (once again I doubt the extra £5m add-on has been activated) and should have been used much better.
He is injured
Any idea how long he's expectated to be out?
Because its impossible to say he's useless until you see it. Obviously we dont see whats happening in training but he must be absolutely shite to not even get a look in. Which is weird considering how highly rated he was, the fact he has 19 caps for the Netherlands, and was one of ETHs key cogs in his Ajax team before.Not to be contrary, but why? He's shown basically nothing to imply he's worth a start and he's clearly boy showing enough in training. Why would we want to start him?
says a lot when Phil Jones exceeds you in top-of-mind contestsIs there a player you actually forget still plays for us more then this bloke?
He genuinely is never an option in my mind
How was he at Everton?
Where the feck is this guy?
Our new Phil JonesWhere the feck is this guy?
Where the feck is this guy?
I honestly forgot he is in our squad . ( can't say plays for us because he doesn't)Where the feck is this guy?
He was according to some going to shine under ETH. Guess it's hard to polish turd.