- Joined
- May 24, 2017
- Messages
- 686
Okay, so you must be a WUM. Putting you on ignore, life is too short.That's what Lingard does too, just that Lingard does it at a higher pace, with more intensity. It wasn't Van de Beek's debut too.
Okay, so you must be a WUM. Putting you on ignore, life is too short.That's what Lingard does too, just that Lingard does it at a higher pace, with more intensity. It wasn't Van de Beek's debut too.
Bruno had one player ahead of him per your graph. Van de Beek had three. It’s a comparison between the two because they’re in direct competition and why I said he needs to do more, or show he can play elsewhere to play more. I didn’t say he was a bad player.So, it's not about having the players to play those passes to, I guess? I love Bruno and I don't understand why this has to be a comparison between the two. I think Donny did fantastically yesterday when he had to be part of us playing from the back. He execute simple, quick passes to move the pack forward and his role was more about absorbing the pressure from Leipzig's pressing than the role Bruno played when he came on.
I'm sure van de Beek will play quite a lot of games and I advise you to spend some time noticing his passing options when he has the ball and what decisions he makes. He is definitely a progressive player and tries to advance our play whenever possible but if your criteria is entirely based on Bruno, he will always fall behind because Bruno tries crazy passes while Donny has a much different style of play.
Show me what constitutes a key pass in that video?Further to my other reply, just look at their passing stats:
Donny: 29 passes, 2 key passes, 89.7% passing accuracy (68 minutes on the pitch)
Bruno: 16 passes, 1 key pass, 62.5% passing accuracy (22 minutes on the pitch)
They have different roles under different tactical instructions.
He was not brilliant. You’ll run out of superlatives for actual great performances if you throw them out like that.Donny was brilliant yesterday, his job was to retain possession against a team that presses really well. We kept the ball better because Donny was in the team.
Bruno, brilliant player but is always looking to do something with the ball, which is good when we need goals and playing lesser teams but in a tight game, which the first half was, we need to keep the ball.
Donny did exactly that, kept the ball moving to a Manchester United player.
Show me what constitutes a key pass in that video?
He was not brilliant. You’ll run out of superlatives for actual great performances if you throw them out like that.
Further to my other reply, just look at their passing stats:
Donny: 29 passes, 2 key passes, 89.7% passing accuracy (68 minutes on the pitch)
Bruno: 16 passes, 1 key pass, 62.5% passing accuracy (22 minutes on the pitch)
They have different roles under different tactical instructions.
Do you realize that players are not static on the field? Those are average positions and they clearly show that more United players were in the opponent's half in the second half of the game. Which means more options for ANY player to pass the ball FORWARD.Bruno had one player ahead of him per your graph. Van de Beek had three. It’s a comparison between the two because they’re in direct competition and why I said he needs to do more, or show he can play elsewhere to play more. I didn’t say he was a bad player.
No video. Whoscored.com match stats.Show me what constitutes a key pass in that video?
Maybe I put it wrong. He doesn't do much when we don't have the ball. His pressing is very soft. He is very useful to beat pressing and that's it for now, but he will do better I'm sure.This statement confuses me, since off the ball is the one thing he's notoriously recognised for; his runs into the box, for example, and scoring goals.
That's the problem I see with him. His impact on the game is very... minimalistic.Massively out of context. Hard to make forward passes when you're already the furthest forward.
He did his job in that role absolutely fine.
The result was brilliant. Performance wasn't. We couldn't get out of our own half for a longer moment.What did he do wrong? The whole team was brilliant. Maybe you need to rewatch the game to realise how good Donny actually was in game.
Oh stop it, Donny is nothing special. Never has been.Some people think Martial is average because he is not a fox in the box goal scorer.
I can see the same people doubting Van De Beeks ability due to his inability to be as creative as Ozil or Bruno Fernandes.
What Van De Beek does is make our game quick and interlink both the attack and the midfield. He makes the run as a forward as well as a midfielder and has passes on to bring others in to play.
The people who say Bruno is better because he is creative - wait until Van De Beek plays with Bruno - he will make Bruno even better than he already is.
The result was brilliant. Performance wasn't. We couldn't get out of our own half for a longer moment.
Sure, but "brilliant" this game was not. "Some sort of pressure" is an euphemism in that case, they pinned us back for 20mins.What? for 20 mins, you have to expect a quality team like Leipzig will have some sort of pressure on us, even that we hardly conceded any clear cut chances.
Oh stop it, Donny is nothing special. Never has been.
And on average Van de Beek had more players ahead of him than Bruno.Do you realize that players are not static on the field? Those are average positions and they clearly show that more United players were in the opponent's half in the second half of the game. Which means more options for ANY player to pass the ball FORWARD.
No video. Whoscored.com match stats.
vDB is the newest player in the block, so of course he is more comparable to slice bread.Lingard is comparable to Pereira, not vDB.
He’ll have a role to play no doubt. But for now he is rightly back up. And last night showed the reason why. Bruno is just considerably more productive.Well he's simply not going to give you that penetrative passing from deep. This guy will hang in and around the box and pop up with three or four decisive touches. The title of that video is everything Van de Beek isn't. He's never going to 'boss' a team with power and technique like Grealish or De Bruyne. But he's exactly the sort of player we need to unpick the lock in a tense game. Seen a lot of people mention Lingard here but Van de Beek even in the few games he's played here looks miles ahead of Lingard in the position and spaces he takes up.
Priya Ramesh in that tweet says "Also I think Van de Beek is the kind of player you notice so much more when he *isn’t* there" by which I think she means you will feel his absence in the games where we struggle to break teams down. Assuming he gets some game time, I think we'll begin to see his true value when we play Arsenal or West Ham in a few weeks.
What did he do that was brilliant? Come on, no sane person can watch that and call it brilliant. Rashford was brilliant. Van de Beek was alright.He put Martial through on one occasion....
What did he do wrong? The whole team was brilliant. Maybe you need to rewatch the game to realise how good Donny actually was in game.
He even covered the most distance and he was on the pitch what 67 minutes?
If we one day can play Pogba, Bruno and VDB in the same team with a CDM that can do most of the defensive job by themselves- we will be back near the top of european football.
I give up. You do you, dude.And on average Van de Beek had more players ahead of him than Bruno.
That’s what happens when you can’t argue facts.I give up. You do you, dude.
how do you think he secures a regular starting position?People who don’t rate Donny should approach another sport because it’s impossible to not appreciate his God-given footballing talents. So assured in possession yet so fantastic off the ball, both offensively and defensively.
A well written comment on a YouTube analysis clip regarding the win yesterday.
“United with Van De Beek at the head cut off the middle of the park to push Leipzig into dead zones on the outside flank where the side line became the 12th man for United. Did you notice how many throw ins Leipzig had--couldn't find or sustain momentum. They simply could not get around Van De Beek up top.
He ran 10 K in 67 mins and Fred behind, who ran 10.5 K in 90 mins. Not only did Van De Beek disrupt RBL constant pressure and flash double-team tackling on the defensive end.. but he also broke Leipzig's press time and again with unreal pin point passing where he would find open space and got United extra time to re/build up possession.
Van De Beek played #10 as only he can as CAPM. Central Attacking Pressing Midfielder. It takes such fundamentally schooled discipline to play that way and to pass with such expansive technical ability to deliver passes so spot on. This type of lead player enabled Fred, Pogba, Matic, Martial to play their roles to perfection. His confidence on the ball spread like wildfire thru the side.”
But yeah, according to the couch experts on RedCafe did not see him score five worldies so he must be shit.
Nothing like creating an argument that isn’t happening. Who said he was shit?But yeah, according to the couch experts on RedCafe did not see him score five worldies so he must be shit.
I showed you facts that you decided to interpret to fit your agenda. I don't care to argue or convince Internet knowitalls, so, have yourself a cake.That’s what happens when you can’t argue facts.
You showed me something that proved me right. Van de Beek had more options ahead of him than Bruno. Simple, undeniable fact. Come back when you understand what that means.I showed you facts that you decided to interpret to fit your agenda. I don't care to argue or convince Internet knowitalls, so, have yourself a cake.
how do you think he secures a regular starting position?
You showed me something that proved me right. Van de Beek had more options ahead of him than Bruno. Simple, undeniable fact. Come back when you understand what that means.
Not when Bruno came on and instantly changed the game.When Bruno was playing he had Cavani, Rashford and Martial upfront.
When VDB was playing as a false 9 he just had Martial and Greenwood.
You chose to ignore the passing stats, the context of the game and any other piece of logic or evidence so consider this my last response and waste of my time. Good luck in life.You showed me something that proved me right. Van de Beek had more options ahead of him than Bruno. Simple, undeniable fact. Come back when you understand what that means.
tbh and this might not be a popular opinion but I dont really want to see Pogba VDB and Bruno playing in the midfield together . What I have enjoyed and think could be something game changing for us is the change in gear when making changes on the 60 minutes or so mark.
V RBL both VDB , Fred and And Greenwood worked their socks off covering some amount of ground then we change it as RBL start to tire with Rashford and Bruno and we literally tear them apart . This for me is where we can move forward, rather than trying to get all the best players shoe horned , starters and finishers, and who more apt to introduce the Dawn of the super sub than the best super sub we probably ever had. Rotation and combinations are the way forward for me, Rashford and Cavani coming off a bench or Greenwood and Martial or any combination of that , Pogba has been excellent coming off the bench rotate him VDB and Bruno , Rotate Matic Fred and McT . We look way more Dangerous this way.
Because I used my eyes. Watch the highlights. Good luck with your eyesight.You chose to ignore the passing stats, the context of the game and any other piece of logic or evidence so consider this my last response and waste of my time. Good luck in life.
how do you think he secures a regular starting position?