Wednesday at Stoke
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2014
- Messages
- 22,241
- Supports
- Time Travel
I hope he kept tapes.
Bolton in talks with officials about testifying
Ooooh he's not gonna pull punches
He's an honest man, doesn't want part in any high crimes. He just wants to fecking bomb Iran.
It does seem a bit too convenient. Giuliani himself may not be the brightest but I'm sure he has some powerful folks planning this out for him. Giuliani probably knows a lot more than we know so far and I would imagine they don't want him to disclose more.Those butt dials...I don't see that implicates guiliani and the first it says something damning for the Biden son.
Might not be a butt dial but on purpose?
Not sure it does ... Obama appointed judge sides with lying democrats in illegal witch hunt against the bestist president ever to deflect attention from hunter and Joe bidens corruption... She should be arrested for wasting government time that could have been used to investigate the real crimes of Hillary's emails so we can drain the swamp and lock her upFederal judge rules impeachment inquiry is legal
That takes away the WH/ GOP's major talking point.
The next court above this one is the DC district headed by Merrick Garland, after that is SCOTUS.Presumably the republicans appeal the decision to a higher court (and ultimately the supreme court till they get the ruling they want?)
Presumably the republicans appeal the decision to a higher court (and ultimately the supreme court till they get the ruling they want?)
Well I think there a quite a few steps from a court decision in trump's favour (and of course it may not even go to the sc) to a Bernie president... You know winning the nomination... His health... Winning a general election.If after all the evidence, the SC decides for Trump, then a Bernie President will simply need to stack the court.
Well I think there a quite a few steps from a court decision in trump's favour (and of course it may not even go to the sc) to a Bernie president... You know winning the nomination... His health... Winning a general election.
I think the odds on Bernie being the next president are about 16/1 to put it in perspective
https://www.oddschecker.com/politics/us-politics
True... If she entered now she would still probably have a better chance than Bernie but as you say nothings certainwhat were the odds for a Hillary presidency?
Nothing is certain in life.
If after all the evidence, the SC decides for Trump, then a Bernie President will simply need to stack the court.
Trump is extremely unlikely to win in the SC.
The Supreme Court ruling that an impeachment hearing is illegal would pretty much be the end of the Supreme Court, surely. They've just about barely managed to hold on to the idea that they are not beholden to politics, but that would thoroughly dispel that notion.
Which isn't even that surprising. Loads of businessmen tend to donate to a new POTUS or someone likely to win to curry favor. In other words - a lot of them that did will have no long term loyalty to the guy - because they would have done it for anyone else. Trump's heavy reliance on people with money who are arguably much successful than he is will eventually be his undoing you would think.The only reason Sondland got the ambassador gig in the first place was because his businesses donated 1 million to Trump's inauguration committee.
Guardian said:Trump hits out at John Kelly's warning about impeachment
Donald Trump hit back at his former chief of staff, John Kelly, after Kelly said he had warned the president about impeachment.
Kelly said he “felt bad” for having left Trump’s side, because his advice was not followed and the president therefore faced impeachment.
Speaking at the Sea Island Summit, an event in Georgia organised by the conservative Washington Examiner, Kelly said that on leaving, he had said: “Whatever you do, don’t hire a ‘yes man’ – someone who won’t tell you the truth.”
“Don’t do that,” the retired marine general said he had told Trump. “Because if you do, I believe you will be impeached.”
CNN reported that the US president denied Kelly’s remarks.
“John Kelly never said that,” Trump said, according to CNN. “He never anything like that.
“If he would have said that I would have thrown him out of the office. He just wants to come back into the action like everybody else.”
The White House press secretary, Stephanie Grisham, confirmed Trump’s response: “I worked with John Kelly, and he was totally unequipped to handle the genius of our great President.”
At this point, you could play a “Who said it” game between the Trump White House and North KoreaJust look at that comment from the Press Secretary:
Magical.
Possibly... But if he could run as an independent (or at least threaten to) that Might make the republican party think twice about going ahead with impeachment.If Trump is ever impeached, it's because GOP senators will have been swayed by disastrously low approval ratings for Trump. If his approval rating gets that low he'd never win any election anyway.
Possibly... But if he could run as an independent (or at least threaten to) that Might make the republican party think twice about going ahead with impeachment.
I certainly don't think he could win as an independent... But I do think he could make it impossible for the republicans to win
Logically if they impeach him (which I doubt) they should stop him from running
The Supreme Court ruling that an impeachment hearing is illegal would pretty much be the end of the Supreme Court, surely. They've just about barely managed to hold on to the idea that they are not beholden to politics, but that would thoroughly dispel that notion.
I think Sondland singing like a canary did it. He had first hand knowledge corroborated by Taylor’s account.I wonder if that means they finally feel their case is iron clad. It being the Dems though you d have to wonder if they re not being stupid. I hope it's the first.
I think Sondland singing like a canary did it. He had first hand knowledge corroborated by Taylor’s account.
I wonder if there’s a scenario wherein he gets acquitted in the Senate but the foreign donation case is ironclad and the FEC forbids him from running.
Is this the point where we all go "here we go" only for the democrats to chicken out and not go ahead with it again.