Do City leave you cold?

I was listening to TalkSport on the way to the chippy earlier, just after they’d beaten Norwich. An American woman phoned in, described herself as a massive City fan……...since February 2021. Through thick and thin man, fair fecks.

To be fair a good deal of TalkSport callers are actors
 
No. As an admirer of the way Pep wants his teams to play, they make me very appreciative and awestruck.
 
They bore me.

They're very technical but so is quantum physics and I'm not watching that for 90 minutes.
 
They bore me.

They're very technical but so is quantum physics and I'm not watching that for 90 minutes.
Snap when they are on as live game at weekend I turn channel its too regimentated they pass ball to death at times and teams just sit back every game mostly its tiresome to watch plus when they are having off day v a r seems to help them plus their billion pound subs bench with more to follow. Yawn.
 
Snap when they are on as live game at weekend I turn channel its too regimentated they pass ball to death at times and teams just sit back every game mostly its tiresome to watch plus when they are having off day v a r seems to help them plus their billion pound subs bench with more to follow. Yawn.

It would be more interesting if their games were competitive. But half of their games are effectively over after the first goal. I reckon pundits could stop watching half of their home games after the first goal and get away with it.
 
Fantastic team, Fantastic coach. Simple as that.

Another thing I have to give them is they have the money to buy the haalands, mbappes, neymars, but generally have bought a tier below that financial level which has to give credit to their recruitment team. Its probably also easier to identify targets when you know exactly the profile of player that the manager wants.
 
They leave me cold. Their ability on and off the ball is just on a different level to United.
 
The fact that United fans were hoping they'd win when Liverpool made those couple trophy runs should tell them how little they mean. If City wins the PL it's sort of like no one won. Leicesters title win means 10x more than all the past 10 years of City trophies imo.

Lecister were the worst champions.
 
If I close my eyes a bit and can't see it's City playing, I certainly enjoy their football and dominance.
I always hated playing Pep teams, they suck joy out of opponents who are not 100% up to it. And we were not up to it today, at least not second half.
 
Style aside, their success is entirely artificial. It's difficult to feel any emotion towards them.
 
Fantastic team, Fantastic coach. Simple as that.

Another thing I have to give them is they have the money to buy the haalands, mbappes, neymars, but generally have bought a tier below that financial level which has to give credit to their recruitment team. Its probably also easier to identify targets when you know exactly the profile of player that the manager wants.

I wonder if them going for 40-80 million pound players is down to Pep's football communism were stars are a problem or if its down to City being aware of the fact that most transfers over £100 million don't actually work.
 
City have got their style to such an art that it really is tedious stuff.

But then a lot of this 1 up front modern day footy is sh!te. Bring back the pace power and 4-4-2 of the 90s any day.
 
I wonder if them going for 40-80 million pound players is down to Pep's football communism were stars are a problem or if its down to City being aware of the fact that most transfers over £100 million don't actually work.

Probably find that a lot of the true prices on these transfers are way beyond what goes through officially.
 
I wonder if them going for 40-80 million pound players is down to Pep's football communism were stars are a problem or if its down to City being aware of the fact that most transfers over £100 million don't actually work.

Probably a bit of both!
 
People are giving credit to City for not spending 100 million and rather doing it with 60-80 million players. World has gone mad. Oh btw they did buy Grealish for big money and were ready to break the bank for Kane but for Levy not agreeing to any fee at all . United are a shockingly run club but if you leave us out then city still have a massive edge over anyone else in spending. Pep is a great coach but it’s no surprise that it feels hollow
 
Fantastic team, Fantastic coach. Simple as that.

Another thing I have to give them is they have the money to buy the haalands, mbappes, neymars, but generally have bought a tier below that financial level which has to give credit to their recruitment team. Its probably also easier to identify targets when you know exactly the profile of player that the manager wants.
I think one thing Pep learnt from his Barcelona days is that managing team of too many world class players is not an easy task as they may or may not agree with his vision.
As long as you have good vision on how you want to play the game, a team with an above average players who fits into that vision will be very hard to beat. This is exactly what Pep and Klopp's teams have been doing. They don't buy superstars, they make them.
Unfortunately we fans think buying haland, Sancho, Ronaldo would suddenly take us to next level. Fact is we have too many below average players on fat contracts and it would be difficult to get rid of them and buy new players.
I've had high hopes from Ragnick but sad to see that he too is struggling to get our current imbeciles in line.
 
I wonder if them going for 40-80 million pound players is down to Pep's football communism were stars are a problem or if its down to City being aware of the fact that most transfers over £100 million don't actually work.
Think the term "champagne communism" is apt in this context
 
Even today, after a very celebrated performance, I found it tedious to watch.

It's very effective at draining the opposition but this constant 10 yard forward, 10 yard back, to one side, back to the other side.

The exact same attack repeated over and over.

After 10 mins of it I'm ready to turn over.
 
Ruthless and boring. But only when they play shite teams like us.

As soon as someone with chaos and intensity comes at them they crumble.

They will win 9 titles out of 10 with this play.
But you probably won't remember a single season.
It will all blend into one big borefest.

Feck them.
 
City have got their style to such an art that it really is tedious stuff.

But then a lot of this 1 up front modern day footy is sh!te. Bring back the pace power and 4-4-2 of the 90s any day.

When United were dominant. Coincidence?
 
When United were dominant. Coincidence?

It was just much more fun all round. Proper wingers, full backs who could defend, centre backs whose main job was defending. Centre mid who could do some of everything, and a proper 2 up front.

Just seemed to be a tonne of depth of both strikers and defenders.
Compare the English strikers now to then for instance, it's outrageous what a drop off in quality there is.
 
Ruthless and boring. But only when they play shite teams like us.

As soon as someone with chaos and intensity comes at them they crumble.

They will win 9 titles out of 10 with this play.
But you probably won't remember a single season.
It will all blend into one big borefest.

Feck them.
Doubt they care, or their fans, just like we didn't care what people thought of us either.
 
Even when in total control and city player gives ball away the willingness to win it back is top class. That is down to proper coaching and work on the training ground.

The way they suck teams in to press them by keeping the ball and with one simple pass they stretch the game and off they attack is joy to watch.
 
They're so hollow to watch. They have some popularity because they are winning but there is no love for the club itself. You could swap their name out with anybody else in football and nobody would care, and their team is the same. A whole squad of very good, completely dull players who play with ruthless efficiency and no flair whatsoever. You could swap any of them around and nobody would notice.

Though i did like their armbands in protest of one murderous regime whilst everything about them is supportive of another.
 
There's a lot to admire about the way they play football, but even so I'd rather they win 5 PL titles than Liverpool one. Everything they do is irrelevant in a sporting context and I don't see them as being our local rivals anymore. They are the club that used to be Manchester City but then became something else.
 
They're so hollow to watch. They have some popularity because they are winning but there is no love for the club itself. You could swap their name out with anybody else in football and nobody would care, and their team is the same. A whole squad of very good, completely dull players who play with ruthless efficiency and no flair whatsoever. You could swap any of them around and nobody would notice.

Though i did like their armbands in protest of one murderous regime whilst everything about them is supportive of another.
It's lucky they don't actually have a striker. Definitely agree with the highlighted bit.
 
It was just much more fun all round. Proper wingers, full backs who could defend, centre backs whose main job was defending. Centre mid who could do some of everything, and a proper 2 up front.

Just seemed to be a tonne of depth of both strikers and defenders.
Compare the English strikers now to then for instance, it's outrageous what a drop off in quality there is.
And back then people were probably pining for whatever the trend was in the 80s.

I remember over lockdown watching the Arsenal/Chelsea UCL quarter final in 2004 and what really stuck out was how simplistic the transitional plays were compared to today and that was the two best teams in the country at that point.

As annoying as Pep's domination has been from the perspective of someone who's hoping their team can challenge his presence has vastly upped the standards of the PL as a whole. The improvement of English teams in Europe goes without saying but back then the gegenpress/pressing managers were being branded as a hipsters trend (even Pep was supposedly going to get found out in this league) while we were enabling the likes of Pardew and Bruce while genuinely trying to pass them off as quality managers at PL level. Even the managers of that ilk who do have some use like Allardyce and Pulis have been struggling to compete in this division, even the one below in the latter's case. Moyes and to an extent Roy are the only one's who's managed to adapt and navigate this new age.

I have no doubt the standard not just at the top but below in this country has improved 100x over since the 00s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Theonas
It was just much more fun all round. Proper wingers, full backs who could defend, centre backs whose main job was defending. Centre mid who could do some of everything, and a proper 2 up front.

Just seemed to be a tonne of depth of both strikers and defenders.
Compare the English strikers now to then for instance, it's outrageous what a drop off in quality there is.

English strikers might have regressed(no more Alan Shearers and Owens), but the quality of PL is now miles above the quality of 90s PL in general terms.

Newcastle, Blackburn, and Leeds (main competitors for United in the 90s) did close zero in Europe, and were constantly getting spanked by continental teams, on the other hand now Liverpool, City, and Chelsea are favorites to win the UCL.

PL has never been better in terms of quality as it is right now.
 
And back then people were probably pining for whatever the trend was in the 80s.

I remember over lockdown watching the Arsenal/Chelsea UCL quarter final in 2004 and what really stuck out was how simplistic the transitional plays were compared to today and that was the two best teams in the country at that point.

As annoying as Pep's domination has been from the perspective of someone who's hoping their team can challenge his presence has vastly upped the standards of the PL as a whole. The improvement of English teams in Europe goes without saying but back then the gegenpress/pressing managers were being branded as a hipsters trend (even Pep was supposedly going to get found out in this league) while we were enabling the likes of Pardew and Bruce while genuinely trying to pass them off as quality managers at PL level. Even the managers of that ilk who do have some use like Allardyce and Pulis have been struggling to compete in this division, even the one below in the latter's case. Moyes and to an extent Roy are the only one's who's managed to adapt and navigate this new age.

I have no doubt the standard not just at the top but below in this country has improved 100x over since the 00s.

Indeed.

The quality of mid table PL teams now is superior by all means to 90s mid table PL teams, no need to mention that current City, Liverpool, and Chelsea would spank the likes of Newcastle, Leeds, and Blackburn (title contenders in the 90s).
 
Doubt they care, or their fans, just like we didn't care what people thought of us either.

This is true. Not many non-United fans will remember or care about the differences between the 1994, 1996 and 1999 title winning sides. Just like I don't expect non-blues to remember or give a toss about whether our 100 point side was better than this one.
 
Last edited:
Its boring cos its not us.

If this was United, we would be lauding the professionalism and hunger of the players, and ability too.

Im jealous at how comfortable they are on the ball, how there arent many if any leaks about player egos, and the BS PR stuff they do. Its annoying to see some of the good football they play and how they are able to kill off games at 2-0 by keeping possession. And reserving energy by doing so.