MikeKing
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2017
- Messages
- 5,127
- Supports
- Bournemouth
A team is only as strong as its weakest link. This was Dalot's big day in the office.
I am in the camp where I think Dalot was never better than a decent player and RB should be high on upgrade priority list, but blaming the whole game on him is just wrong.Where was he for Liverpool’s first goal?
I think he is the reason everything went wrong in the match, we were quite decent til the first goal.
Not much is indicating that he's an attacking fullback... His technique is decent, but is output is way too low.His ability to play the offside line is as infuriating as AWB. I get it, he's an attacking fullback, I know he'll never defend like Cafu but for the love of god, play the offside trap.
Liverpool had a total of 0 offsides today.
In the first half, when we attacked he would tuck inside like a RW/AM and carry the ball. I think ETH really likes a full back that tucks inside and acts like an additional midfielder.Not much is indicating that he's an attacking fullback... His technique is decent, but is output is way too low.
Liverpool built from the back, with Alison even went out of his box to make play. Antony was in the advance pressing position like Rashford and Bruno where they position in half space to press if Liverpool passing between their CBs and their deeper midfielders. Dalot took initiative to track Robertson. Whether Dalot was wrong by not being close enough to Robertson is up to debate.The first goal was very weird. Antony should have helped him more on that though. I am not sure what they were doing so high up leaving the Liverpool player alone on that side.
Yeah I was surprised he wasn't replaced at half time like he was against Barcelona.It was evident after 10 minutes that he is having a shocker, why wasn't he replaced is a mistery to me.
Not sure if I understand correctly, but I don't think, this is a case of "Dalot plays because ETH likes his style" but rather "Dalot plays that style because ETH wants him to". It isn't a completely new trend anymore to make use of Fullbacks to support the midfield. And no question about Dalot being more suited to that than AWB is.In the first half, when we attacked he would tuck inside like a RW/AM and carry the ball. I think ETH really likes a full back that tucks inside and acts like an additional midfielder.
With what money?Never rated him. Never understood the hype he got from fans. He was decent. He’s never the solution and getting a RB is a priority. Ben white is a better RB than him and he isn’t even a right back. So is TAA for all his flaws defensively, less said about Walker and James the better. These are the teams we have to compete against next season for top spots and he’s no where good enough. We need to get rid of De gea and him to overhaul the defence once and for all.
Maybe the Portuguese coach undid all the good decent coaches have been doing across Europe.I said earlier in the season let's see what he's like when that early season pump wears off.
He was massively motivated before the world cup. Really up for it. That has visibly dissappeared as can be expected.
So now we're left with his actual level.
Good squad player. Can play both sides.
Not a starter for a title winning team. Unless the rest of the team is incredible.
That man-marking thing may work in some games, but I'm not convinced it's the best strategy against every 'big' team for now. It explained why he liked to stick Wout where he didn't belong and shift Burno to wide so he wouldn't have to manmark someone and create at the same time, which would be too much to ask of a player. Not to mentioned we had no pace in the wide areas (Bruno and Antony) which is insane as that's how you have to play against teams like pool and city away.Liverpool built from the back, with Alison even went out of his box to make play. Antony was in the advance pressing position like Rashford and Bruno where they position in half space to press if Liverpool passing between their CBs and their deeper midfielders. Dalot took initiative to track Robertson. Whether Dalot was wrong by not being close enough to Robertson is up to debate.
Our midfield marked man for man during Liverpool build up for the first goal. Casimero followed Elliot, Fred tracked Henderson and picked up Gakpo when he dropped into this big space our midfield in front of the backline. Weghorst tracked Fabinho.
Liverpool did very well using Alison as extra man for the build up. Our players, our pressing tactic got found out, flat footed. Alisson under no pressure, played that passed to Robertson. Gakpo had time to move wide unmarked, while Robertson dribbled infield forced Fred to stop following Gakpo and station centrally instead.
IMO Klopp outsmarted ETH tactically, not only here but the whole game. Liverpool was able to find way to bypass out pressing. Not only this instance, but many time throughout the first half, let alone the slaughter in second half. Weghorst not a real midfielder, and lack of pace means that we happen to leave big space in midfield, especially when our other midfielders got their hand busy. Weghorst didn't have the instinct of a midfielder to know when to stop man marking and go to cover space in midfielder. He was easily got pulled out of the chess board by Fabinho movement, when we would have benefited from some help to let Fred stay with Gakpo. It's a systematic error leading to the first goal, which a based on personnel issue (Weghorst midfield role).
I was not sure what he was doing exactly most of the time. At some point, he was in the box almost all the way to the left side, close to Shaw. You wonder if they counterattack who the hell would be covering the place down right.Missed the first half. Why did he get subbed? Being shit?
Missed the first half. Why did he get subbed? Being shit?
Funny, I see this alot. I wonder if AWB would've received the same benefit of the doubt.I'm going to hold off on the criticism until he is back in match fitness and form.