ShinjiNinja26
Full Member
£105m for Declan fecking Rice?? West Ham will be laughing all the way to the bank.
They should hold on and see what City do in the next couple of days.Surely they’ll accept that.
From what i read these money are investment (as low interest loan) from the owner to the team, and not generated from revenue. It is not sustainable unless Arsenal is back into a top 4/5 team with CL money.Imagine telling a football fan from even just a few years ago that Arsenal would be spending £100m on a single player. A club whose managers, club hierarchy and supporters themselves have always slated every other big PL club for “distorting the market” and ruining the game.
Now they’re spending £105m on a DM + probably another £100m or more on other signings. No more Poor Little Arsenal act from them now.
They should hold on and see what City do in the next couple of days.
West Ham are loving this, I'd love to see them rinse one of them for £120m.
£105m for Declan fecking Rice?? West Ham will be laughing all the way to the bank.
Insane amount for Declan fecking Rice but oh well clearly not my money. 200M spent already and it's not even July ! Good thing FFP is a myth
Remember, we paid £60m for a 30 year old Casemiro.
Crazy amount. Good player but far from the top class 100m could get you. For the money arsenal are spending this summer they should be getting better players.
£60m for a 30 year old Casemiro - assume you get 3 years out of Casemiro at the highest level. it is £20m a season£100m + £5m add-ons is still a great deal.
People automatically assume that's £105m gone, It doesn't work like that. He's 24 years old, they could keep him until he's 29/30 and with inflation in the transfer market, could get most of their money back if they sold him down the line.
Remember, we paid £60m for a 30 year old Casemiro.
It's just a case of managing transfer funds over a long period.
Apart from Havertz, who else have you signed?Insane amount for Declan fecking Rice but oh well clearly not my money. 200M spent already and it's not even July ! Good thing FFP is a myth
Meh that's assuming he fits perfectly in the team and play well enough to never get displaced. There is massive pressure on him from the start, he will join Saka Odegaard and Jesus as the biggest players of the squad.£60m for a 30 year old Casemiro - assume you get 3 years out of Casemiro at the highest level. it is £20m a season
£100m for a 24 year old Rice - 4 year contract. it is £25m/season. If he decides to renew another 4 years, it will be even cheaper per season.
Not that it is cheap by any mean. English tax and EPL tax are real.
Timber from Ajax is close to being done for 40/45M.Apart from Havertz, who else have you signed?
Timber is close for around 40mApart from Havertz, who else have you signed?
I just hope we don't join this mad bidding war, even with exchange of two players. City will back out of the deal , and will be laughing at whoever has the player. Hoping it is not us.
Atleast for me, it is just a no-go. Rice is decent player, but does not have extra-ordinary skillset which demands that much money. And with our history of english players, it is most likely to be a failure.Not against it with player exchange but certainly way too much for straight deal
For the 170m it’ll cost, is Rice/Havertz/Odegaard any better than Partey/Xhaka/Odegaard?
Arsenal for me would have been better spending that £ on a goalscorer upfront.
Yes, definitely better on the ball. Xhaka improved but he's still prone to meltdowns and can be a card magnet. And Rice upgrades the 6 with the bonus of no black cloud of off-pitch stuff hanging over him.
Which goalscorer do you think Edu could have realistically signed?
Yeah but still too much money for him. They still need a top goal scorer which could be another 100m the way things are these days.He's probably the best that fits what Arteta wants that is excited to sign with Arsenal though. It's not like Camavinga and Tchouameni are going to come to Arsenal.
Literally any striker would be available for 170m bar Haaland.
Atleast for me, it is just a no-go. Rice is decent player, but does not have extra-ordinary skillset which demands that much money. And with our history of english players, it is most likely to be a failure.
If we were to exchange two players, we should exchange with Brighton (for Caicedo) or Spurs (For Kane)