Who's leaking these stories of renewal? I'm calling bollocks until I see something legit...
De Gea Contract Situation
- Thread starter Sassy Colin
- Start date
- Status
In all seriousness though, I think he has every right to listen to the woman he loves. Whether or not she has played a part in all this, it's irrelevant to us.
Though if he wanted to stay and she wanted him to go, we all know how that would end in compromise
Mata is De Gea's "grief counsellor". Funniest thing I've read all day-so far.
nah , that he is doomed to renew with us was better
That's the single worst piece of 'journalism' from the whole window.
Amazing our outdated IT equipment didn't affect the deals with PSV, Southampton, Bayern, and Torino.
Definitely says something about those that would believe drivel like that.
Should never have allowed Moyesy to take his iPads back, IMO.
that reminds me...can you imagine Moyes having to deal with all this?
Wow, what a load of crap. I enjoyed all the jokey stuff around the clubs IT systems, but shoehorning an article out of it?! Oh well, this sort of thing passes for journalism thesedays.
The attachment must have exceeded the 5Mb limit for the free email account we use.
Does anyone know how likely he'll start for Spain now?
Oh how the reaction would have been differentthat reminds me...can you imagine Moyes having to deal with all this?
They really do live in a bubble these people. Poor lambs.
Who would expected that on September 3, 2015 you can comment on this:
Not Real Madrid keepers.
It's the Telegraph, a once great newspaper that fired it's quality journalists wholesale and set off into the brave new digital world without a clue as to how they were going to navigate those waters. Anyone who follows "Street of Shame" in the Eye knows that sales have plummeted, the web pages are filled with sponsored content, and they can't even give away copies of the rag itself. Sad really.
Agree 100%.
It surprises me to think that a grown man can have decisions made for him by other people, as if he is some 12 year old kid.
He is a grown man. Very wealthy. He is mentally normal. He makes his own decisions.
If any of you disagree with DDG's decision making, don't blame his agent, his mum, girlfriend, grand mother or dog.
Blame DDG.
As someone said earlier, this is a purely professional decision. He feels that Madrid are bigger club, so it'll be good for his career. When you also consider that his family live in Spain and Madrid is far more glamorous than Manchester, it makes it a no-brainer, for him.
I don't feel that he will sign another contract with us, but I do believe he will play in our first team, until he leaves.
"a unified experience for fans" implies manutd.com and possibly our social media experience would get a well needed overhaul. Our website is almost certainly a completely different system from the internal systems, and even the internal systems are probably well differentiated. Nonsense, sensational article. I work in IT btw.
'Holistic'.
How often does a player as good as De Gea actually let their contract expire? It can't be often. He'll get a hefty pay increase and leave guarantees.
As I said before, from a commercial view, which his agent and finance team must put first, signing a new contract with us is essential.
Without it, a serious injury within the next 6 months, whether career ending or 12 months plus out the game, would be utterly disastrous financially, never mind the physical issues. It is his agents job to protect him from being in that position, so signing a new contract with a release clause is best for everyone, bar madrid. He has his protection against something happening to him, we gain control over his leaving.
Without it, a serious injury within the next 6 months, whether career ending or 12 months plus out the game, would be utterly disastrous financially, never mind the physical issues. It is his agents job to protect him from being in that position, so signing a new contract with a release clause is best for everyone, bar madrid. He has his protection against something happening to him, we gain control over his leaving.
Is that true?
I think that will be what happens in the end. From what I've read, Mendes always wanted him to resign and leave through the front door instead of the back. Mendes isn't a saint by any means, but in this case his interest and our align because he would want money from the signing on fee and his % of the transfer along with a continued good relationship with United.
It's on the SportWitness site, which is utter clickbait, made-up shite.
Perez's mouthpiece Marca reckons that if De Gea signs a new contract, that'll probably be that. Since the relationship between the two clubs is sour, they don't want to negotiate.
Wouldn't have thought they'd take it that far as to make up an amount he's already been paid, but then again, this is my first time reading a SportWitness 'article'.
I've seen €10 million in compensation for De Gea mentioned from multiple sources, but the €15 million claim I've only seen here.
Clubs cannot make pre-contracts with other players (unless the player is on the last 6 months of his contract) which means that they cannot guarantee that they will sign a player. In fact, they aren't supposed to even talk with the player until the selling club accepts the bid, or player is on the last months of his contract.
While, this doesn't stop the clubs tapping up players, it goes in the level of discussing things and gentleman agreements. If something is put in the paper, then we could sue Madrid, and at the very least they will be in very big trouble.
The compensation package if the transfer doesn't happen, or the bonus fee if you run the contract down, or compensation fee the other way around if De Gea resigns for United, are a Marca invention. sportwitness most likely have just read one of their articles.
What could be real though, is that Madrid-Mendez-De Gea have a gentleman agreement that Madrid will pay X-amount of money as signing on fee, but nothing official. If De Gea resigns for United, Madrid can do feck all. If Madrid doesn't want De Gea after a year, De Gea can do feck all. If Madrid offers De Gea only 5m signing on fee, the most De Gea can do is not sign the contract.
Wonderful. This whole saga will benefit us so much in the future, as long as Woodward is here Madrid will be reluctant to deal with us.
Exactly! We don't get Bale … but they won't get ANY of our promising youngsters once they start performing to potential!
I dunno, I still think it'll happen. Clubs don't have to be particularly friendly in order to do business: Fergie once stated something along the lines of that he wouldn't sell Real Madrid a cold...yet then we sold Ronaldo to them. If they want De Gea, they'll still pursue him. Even if De Gea signs a new contract, he'll probably still go presuming he wants to, and we get a good fee for him.
I think once Perez is given the elbow there won't be a problem. I think Madrid would do business with us, but I doubt whoever replaces him would want De Gea - especially if Navas is doing well
... unless their contract is set to expire..
We should try to negotiate a deal with Barca for a swap with Ter Stegen. Both clubs would be happy.
Thats not really true though...that article isnt made up, its rather a translation of the el pais article...whether the original article is true or not isnt on sport witness...but the thing amount madrid owing de gea a fee if the transfer didnt go through has been constantly run by the spanish press , not just marca. Its not exactly legal, but so is talking to a player under contract, and this evidently happened here.
They got more click posting edurne leaked photos. They can charge membership as well. I would. Lol
Still waiting for some kinda official press release from United, De Gea or hopefully both in a joint venture. I guess he's going back in goal for us, but first LvG will force him to suck his balls in front of the squad.
It's a clickbait site. They'll post anything without any checks whatsover.
- Status