bond19821982
Last Man Standing champion 2019/20
He isn't going to Spurs or Arsenal for sure.
Agree but we're not in a position of strength to do that. Buying in other positions (DM, CM, RW, RB) is better use of our limited funds than an expensive competitor to by far our highest paid player.
Nah not yet but I heard he has issued a new open bus ticket for your lot to celebrate that alternate Champions League trophy in Portugal though.Has Nunez issued a don't come and get me plea yet like De Jong?
Has Nunez issued a don't come and get me plea yet like De Jong?
Can’t take that kind of gamble at the prices being quoted. Andy Carroll has been released by WBA, we should just sign him on a free and use the money for DM/CM.If he comes here, he could be Kane, or he could be Carroll.
Yeah he's not going to Tottenham.
Arsenal missed CL so they're no better position than us either. I think we are in pole position.
They have Nketiah who was doing pretty well toward the end of the season, but agreed they could also do with him.He would be a guarantee starter there with lacca gone.
I really prefer Richarlison but interested to see how this works out.
They have Nketiah who was doing pretty well toward the end of the season, but agreed they could also do with him.
They should work in front of crowds of 75000 filled with spectators who’ve paid £45 a ticket if they want parity.100k/week for Eddie was offered. And nurses get 2k a month.
Something ain't right.
Tell us you're a Tory, without telling us you're a Tory.They should work in front of crowds of 75000 filled with spectators who’ve paid £45 a ticket if they want parity.
Voted Labour all my life and I’ll never vote for that scum.Tell us you're a Tory, without telling us you're a Tory.
What's with the parity comment? Or did I not get the sarcasm?Voted Labour all my life and I’ll never vote for that scum.
I think it’s stupid to compare nurses wages to footballers wages because it’s obvious why footballers are paid more? That’s not to say nurses aren’t underpaid because they obviously are but I’ve always hated that comparison, it’s never made sense.What's with the parity comment? Or did I not get the sarcasm?
I think it’s stupid to compare nurses wages to footballers wages because it’s obvious why footballers are paid more? That’s not to say nurses aren’t underpaid because they obviously are but I’ve always hated that comparison, it’s never made sense.
100k/week for Eddie was offered. And nurses get 2k a month.
Something ain't right.
Doesn’t matter, we’ll never be able to replace Origi and Minamino.You might be in for him yourselves with your two main men departing in the next 12 months!
Yep good post and exactly how I see it. I think some fans have this idea that the team has to be perfectly symmetrical but I could certainly see a lopsided team with Nunez and Ronaldo floating on the left with Bruno and Sancho moved further to the right side.I don't know why people are arguing about Ronaldo so much. We aren't linked with a winger at all. Darwin is the only real attacker we have links with. Our winger options next year are Sancho (good), Rashford (had an awful year), and Elanga (average and young anyway). Ronaldo has never been an actual #9. He's always been best as a wide forward.
To me, it's pretty clear. I think if we get Darwin, we'll start him centrally, and then have him and Ronaldo drift around and swap with each other, Darwin being the guy who gets in behind while Ronaldo does his thing just in front of the defensive line, having more space out wide but being very much a forward (just not on the shoulder of the defence). Rashford will probably rotate with Ronaldo to rest him in all the cups. Sancho and Bruno to be the creators/link players in the line between the deeper midfielders and the forwards. Essentially a lopsided 4231, where Ronaldo is more forward and Sancho is more a creator. Sancho and Ronaldo can both play on either wing too, just they'd play very differently of course.
Doesn't really seem like an issue to me. Defensively off the ball, Darwin's work rate would help cover for Ronaldo's lack of, while he also has the pace and strength that Ronaldo might not have anymore to be the threat in behind.
And he's got twice as many goals as all of them put together, including key champions league winners against elite competition.He's got the passing range of McTominay, dribbling of Wan-Bissaka and the first touch of Lukaku. Erik came up against him for 180 minutes where he completed a total of 8/18 passes.
He's got the passing range of McTominay, dribbling of Wan-Bissaka and the first touch of Lukaku. Erik came up against him for 180 minutes where he completed a total of 8/18 passes.
Still the gullible fanbase and United are desperate to waste half their budget for him to come to a possession-based team working in tight spaces because they saw him finish off a couple of counter-attacks with acres of space in the CL. There's no end to the frustration as a sensible United fan.
Nkunku would be a miles better goalscorer who can actually dribble and do one-twos through parked buses. If we can't get him we need to get a young, cheap option in who still has resale value if he flops. Signing Nuñez for around £80m on high wages will be worse than Chelsea signing Lukaku and will set us back years, also possibly have Erik sacked since he won't have funds to spend on other positions.And he's got twice as many goals as all of them put together, including key champions league winners against elite competition.
Don't get me wrong, I'm on the record as doubting his technique but we have a severe lack of non-Ronaldo goals in this side. Buying goalscorers is rarely cheap.
Another gullible fan taking indykaila tweets as gospel. If we buy Nuñez it'd be a club/Murtough signing forced upon him because the club thinks they know best as usual. Erik will be forced to come out and claim he wanted him not to undermine the player though, so you won't get your beloved reports backing this up.So sensible United fan Vs totally dopey experienced football coach who watched him over 2 legs in the flesh and seems to want to buy him? Is that where we're taking this?
I’ve seen this mentioned a few times in various threads but seen and heard different things. But is ETH even really a possesion based coach. Yes rather have more of the ball than the other team every coach wants that, but he moved the ball vertically between the lines quite a lot with fast interchanges of positions and passing from what I’ve seen of him. Not particularly a system that will live and die by the first touch of the forward although if he can at least pop it off first time and spin inbehind or reposition himself to make an option then he’ll have done half the job required.He's got the passing range of McTominay, dribbling of Wan-Bissaka and the first touch of Lukaku. Erik came up against him for 180 minutes where he completed a total of 8/18 passes.
Still the gullible fanbase and United are desperate to waste half their budget for him to come to a possession-based team working in tight spaces because they saw him finish off a couple of counter-attacks with acres of space in the CL. There's no end to the frustration as a sensible United fan.
You can bet your house on that Erik wants us to play a high line with interchanging positions and combinations of play between striker, forwards, midfielders and full-backs though. If he dares playing such a high line with De Gea sweeping remains to be seen. We'll face parked buses in 80% of PL games however, where Nuñez will have no space which he has in abundance in Primeira Liga and CL.I’ve seen this mentioned a few times in various threads but seen and heard different things. But is ETH even really a possesion based coach. Yes rather have more of the ball than the other team every coach wants that, but he moved the ball vertically between the lines quite a lot with fast interchanges of positions and passing from what I’ve seen of him. Not particularly a system that will live and die by the first touch of the forward although if he can at least pop it off first time and spin inbehind or reposition himself to make an option then he’ll have done half the job required.
Give him chances and it looks like he knows how to score in many different varying fashions. Works hard, scores goals. Sounds a bit like a certain Cavani but with the added bonus of being quick over the grass.
The fees mentioned are ridiculous, unless this swap deal is true but hopefully 60 mil is it at its max because anything more and it will be a massive gamble.
However we’ve spent big on supposed dead certs before and they’ve failed horribly. Lukaku, Pogba, Maguire, DiMaria
Nkunku would be a miles better goalscorer who can actually dribble and do one-twos through parked buses. If we can't get him we need to get a young, cheap option in who still has resale value if he flops. Signing Nuñez for around £80m on high wages will be worse than Chelsea signing Lukaku and will set us back years, also possibly have Erik sacked since he won't have funds to spend on other positions.
Another gullible fan taking indykaila tweets as gospel. If we buy Nuñez it'd be a club/Murtough signing forced upon him because the club thinks they know best as usual. Erik will be forced to come out and claim he wanted him not to undermine the player though, so you won't get your beloved reports backing this up.
I think it’s stupid to compare nurses wages to footballers wages because it’s obvious why footballers are paid more? That’s not to say nurses aren’t underpaid because they obviously are but I’ve always hated that comparison, it’s never made sense.
Haller has really good feet for his size, he just wasn't mobile enough playing alone in acres of space for a hoofball club like West Ham. Nuñez on the other hand would suit West Ham perfectly, rubbish with the ball but mobile and decent finisher. In other words playing to his strengths is playing Ole/Moyes counter attack ball. Something I, for one, am tired of.Have you ever watched Haller play? Quite possibly the worst passer I've ever seen in the Premier League. Ten Hag did ok with him though because he played to his strengths - finishing, heading, decent pace. That's what he would do with Darwin as well if he wants him, play to his strengths.
Thats a good comparison. Particularly as Cavani has never been technically that great. Often a bit sloppy with his linkup play. Nunez has the same workrate but is faster, taller and younger. Whether he ever reaches Cavani's level remains to be seen, but it proves the point that you don't have to have a velvet touch to be a great goalscorer.Works hard, scores goals. Sounds a bit like a certain Cavani but with the added bonus of being quick over the grass.
Nkunku gives me Sancho vibes. Clearly a good player but I don't think he's going to put up those numbers in the Prem. I suspect defenders are going to worry a lot more about Nunez than Nkunku, but let's see. I'd be happy with either. It depends how Erik wants to set up his attacking play.Nkunku would be a miles better goalscorer who can actually dribble and do one-twos through parked buses.