matherto
ask me about our 50% off sale!
Rooney - FalcaoTheoretical formations
Ronaldo ------ Di Maria
Blind - Herrera
Shaw - Hummels - Someone Else - Rafael
De Gea
Put another midfielder in and take Rooney out. 4-3-3. Perfect.
Rooney - FalcaoTheoretical formations
Ronaldo ------ Di Maria
Blind - Herrera
Shaw - Hummels - Someone Else - Rafael
De Gea
We don't need a 2 goal head start in every match from now until Christmas... it would bloody help though.Unless he converts to a centre back we don't need him.
He's been amazing so far.
We don't need a 2 goal head start in every match from now until Christmas... it would bloody help though.
That's the one game I didn't see. Not surprising that he'd have one off game and be the focus just because of that.The commentators wouldn't stop slagging him off against Malaga.
To the point where they genuinely stopped talking about the game and just repeated that Messi had been terrible.
This is probably the closest to what would happen regarding his scoring, and of course it's still very, very impressive, but until one of them turns up in the PL or BL and has as ridiculous a goals to games ratio as Ronaldo, Messi, Falcao have had in LL then I'll continue to doubt the competitiveness in LL.
Funny, cause Mr Past It has been the best player in La Liga already this season, bar the tumescent display Wednesday night... unless you go by the Muppet mentality that scoring lots of goals makes you the best.
Suárez last season had a ridiculous goals to games ratio last year, one which was significantly better than Falcao's in La Liga, and he's clearly an inferior player to Ronaldo and Messi. And considering how easily Ronaldo and Messi have scored against the top English teams in the CL I find it hard to believe they'd have anything less than a goals-per-game ratio in England. He has 186 goals in 169 league games in La Liga which is "only" 1.1 goals per game, so even if they were to "only" score 1 goal per game the difference is negligible. Using the league they play in as a stick to beat them with is just silly. If you're comparing it to the Serie A in the 80s then sure there's a vast difference, but the top European leagues at this point in time are all absurdly top-heavy, and the only people that think England isn't are those that support a top team in England and are completely insulated and absorbed by the constant marketing of the PL as "the most competitive league in the world". Perhaps it's slightly more competitive than Spain or Germany but it's still an oligopoly.
It's not even that I view the PL as 'superior', I just feel that the overall speed of the game that every well versed PL side is used to, coupled with the higher physicality would take the sheen off what we see from Ronaldo and Messi in La Liga. Maybe Ronaldo's GTG ratio in his last season with us compared to his first season at Real would prove me wrong, I can't find the info so I'm not sure.
not al all, he is one of the greatest players ever, he is playing better than messi now and he will probably win as many golden balls as messiYeah, he's clearly shit then. Got it.
They probably wouldn't have won it without Ronaldo on the pitch though.
Basically he's a flat track bully.
Basically he's a flat track bully.
The entire world is flat in the eyes of Ronaldo, in that case.Basically he's a flat track bully.
ThisThe entire world is flat in the eyes of Ronaldo, in that case.
not al all, he is one of the greatest players ever, he is playing better than messi now and he will probably win as many golden balls as messi
those facts doesnt change the fact that Real Madrid would have won the 10th CL without most of his goals
Not boring to watch, but it does seem more of a job for him nowadays. In 2006/07 he was an entertainer.I find him boring to watch. Goal machine.
In 2006/07 he was a really exciting player.
Not boring to watch, but it does seem more of a job for him nowadays. In 2006/07 he was an entertainer.
They probably wouldn't have won it without Ronaldo on the pitch though.
In 2006/07 he was like Di Maria now but with more strength and power and more goals, which shows how good he was.Basically cut out the fancy stuff and concentrated more on end product (that has increased). Take your pick lads.
In 2006/07 he was like Di Maria now but with more strength and power and more goals, which shows how good he was.
I was surprised to read how many of the goals were basically meaningless, but considering they edged out a fine Dortmund side after Mkhitaryan missed several excellent chances, you'd have to say Ronaldo scoring the 3rd goal in the first leg was massive. Without it - and possibly due to him missing the 2nd leg - they could very easily have gone out in that tie.
Slightly off topic, but similar to Marcos' post.Ronaldo 17 goals record:
Group Stages:
first game Real madrid won 6-1 against galatasaray Ronaldo scored three goals the 3-0, 4-0 and 6-1
http://es.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2014/matches/round=2000479/match=2011769/index.html
second game against Kobenhavn Ronaldo scored the two first goals of a 4-0 game
http://es.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2014/matches/round=2000479/match=2011778/index.html
third game against juventus, Real Madrid at home won 2-1 both goals were scored by ronaldo -second one was a Pk-
http://es.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2014/matches/round=2000479/match=2011793/index.html
fourth game against juventus away. they tied 2-2 ronaldo scored the first goal of the game
http://es.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2014/matches/round=2000479/match=2011817/index.html
fifth game, against galatasaray at home, ronaldo didnt play
http://es.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2014/matches/round=2000479/match=2011825/index.html
sixth game against Kobenhavn Real MAdrid won the away game 2-0 ronaldo scored the second goal and missed a penalty
http://es.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2014/matches/round=2000479/match=2011850/index.html
knockout phase
first game of the eight finals against shalke ronaldo scored the 3rd and sixth goal in a 6-1 victory (the shalke goal was in the minute 93)
http://es.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2014/matches/round=2000480/match=2011862/index.html
second game of the eight finals ronaldo scored the 1st and 2nd goal in the 3-1 victory over shalke
http://es.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2014/matches/round=2000480/match=2011868/index.html
first game of the quarter finals, Ronaldo scored the 3rd goal of a 3-0 victory over Dortmund
http://es.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2014/matches/round=2000481/match=2011872/index.html
second game of the quarter finals, Ronaldo didnt play against dortmund, and they lost 2-0
http://es.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2014/matches/round=2000481/match=2011878/index.html
first game of the semifinals against Bayern munich, Real Madrid won 1-0 Ronaldo didnt score
http://es.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2014/matches/round=2000482/match=2011880/index.html
second game of the semifinals against Bayern Munich, Real Madrid won 4-0 Ronaldo scored the 3rd and fourth goal
http://es.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2014/matches/round=2000482/match=2011881/index.html
final game against Atletico de Madrid, Ronaldo scored the 4th goal over a penalty kick at the 120 minute
And i'm sorry if any of you don't like it, but this is a forum where "messi has yet to make it in a cold monday night against stoke" was repeated endlesly, so this post, compared to that stupid sentence, is pure gold
cheers
I find him boring to watch. Goal machine.
In 2006/07 he was a really exciting player.
Imagine a better looking two-footed Di Maria who can score goals and has a greater array of tricks, outstanding in the air.. brilliant set-piece taker.. that is what we're dealing with when we are talking about Ronaldo. Other day I was going through games he played in from 04-07.. and his talent was unbelievable, one of the most exciting and gifted players to ever grace the football pitch. People criticise his decision-making back then, but it was solid.. he kept possession very well and was a solid passer (never a number 10 style passer - doesn't have that style of game), compared to say a young Giggsy who lost the ball quite often. Ronaldo's one touch play was excellent, his touch immaculate... he only struggled in the final third when it came to shot execution, would blaze wildly over the bar quite often and ball hog quite a fair bit.. but he was a game changer, he was a driving force.. got the ball from deep and within seconds opponents were on the back foot.
He looks better than ever at the start of this season, his dribbling seems to still be going strong - we should appreciate him while we can, none of the new talents coming through at the moment touch him at all.. I mean Gotze for example, nowhere near as exciting as a young Ronaldo, guys like Hazard? no way, Ronaldo was a lot more explosive.. and had that potential where he looked like once everything came together he would tear teams apart single-handedly.
My only criticism of Ronaldo is that in the biggest of games, his dribbling has let him down... whereas as a youngster, he still dribbled well and looked dangerous against organised defences, as he matured it has become easier to mark him out of a game.. and it is his goal-scoring and especially his heading ability which comes to the fore in high pressure games. That is fine but if he could put in all-round performances and be a maestro in such games, it would enhance his reputation that much further.. as a youngster, you felt like he'd be capable of scoring a Maradona v England goal.. that is how good he was at running at players, but he's never managed to score that type of goal or control big international encounters/european cup games in that manner.
That's suggests you don't know what kind of player di Maria is. He's a lot more of a midfielder than you think he is. Ronaldo has never and will never work as hard as Di Maria. You will never see Ronaldo chase and Harry the way di Maria did in midfield for madrid last season. Even 06/07 Ronaldo didn't track back and work hard off the ball like that let alone todAys Ronaldo.Imagine a better looking two-footed Di Maria who can score goals and has a greater array of tricks, outstanding in the air.. brilliant set-piece taker.. that is what we're dealing with when we are talking about Ronaldo. Other day I was going through games he played in from 04-07.. and his talent was unbelievable, one of the most exciting and gifted players to ever grace the football pitch. People criticise his decision-making back then, but it was solid.. he kept possession very well and was a solid passer (never a number 10 style passer - doesn't have that style of game), compared to say a young Giggsy who lost the ball quite often. Ronaldo's one touch play was excellent, his touch immaculate... he only struggled in the final third when it came to shot execution, would blaze wildly over the bar quite often and ball hog quite a fair bit.. but he was a game changer, he was a driving force.. got the ball from deep and within seconds opponents were on the back foot.
He looks better than ever at the start of this season, his dribbling seems to still be going strong - we should appreciate him while we can, none of the new talents coming through at the moment touch him at all.. I mean Gotze for example, nowhere near as exciting as a young Ronaldo, guys like Hazard? no way, Ronaldo was a lot more explosive.. and had that potential where he looked like once everything came together he would tear teams apart single-handedly.
My only criticism of Ronaldo is that in the biggest of games, his dribbling has let him down... whereas as a youngster, he still dribbled well and looked dangerous against organised defences, as he matured it has become easier to mark him out of a game.. and it is his goal-scoring and especially his heading ability which comes to the fore in high pressure games. That is fine but if he could put in all-round performances and be a maestro in such games, it would enhance his reputation that much further.. as a youngster, you felt like he'd be capable of scoring a Maradona v England goal.. that is how good he was at running at players, but he's never managed to score that type of goal or control big international encounters/european cup games in that manner.
That's suggests you don't know what kind of player di Maria is. He's a lot more of a midfielder than you think he is. Ronaldo has never and will never work as hard as Di Maria. You will never see Ronaldo chase and Harry the way di Maria did in midfield for madrid last season. Even 06/07 Ronaldo didn't track back and work hard off the ball like that let alone todAys Ronaldo.
Ronaldo is obviously a better player but that summary is completely off the mark.
What's an interesting topic of discussion for me is how good a dribbler Ronaldo used to be. He burnt so many defenders back then but he was at times so easily frustrated and contained by the better teams in that aspect. I mean, Cole basically had him in his pocket everytime after the first time they played each other. The likes of di Mara and Iniesta seem to consistently show their dribbling quality even in tight games. I think it's possible that Ronaldo's dribbling ability wants nearly as good as we all used to think. Against smaller teams it looked great and his trickery threw those defenders off but genuine dribbling and deft change of direction, maybe he wasn't an elite dribbler.
None of the players I mention do that. Iniesta is a midfield playmaker and Di Maria does a greater deal of his good work in the buildup than Ronaldo did. I'm sorry but Ronaldo simply doesn't have a case for "being the guy who conducts from deep" more than these other players. Quite the opposite.If you look at where Ronaldo used to conduct his dribbles from you'd be amazed how deep he'd start off.. he didn't just hang forward waiting for the ball to come to him.
Good thing I wasn't comparing them as wingers. I was saying that Ronaldo didn't chase and harry the way Di Maria does. He never did and doesnt now either. He worked harder as a kid but he was still very individualistic and it was nowhere comparable to what Di Maria showed last year, for example. It's not his nature to be chasing and being a pain for attackers. Which is not a criticism because hes always been so good going forward. I was just highlighting how you saying Ronaldo was "basically Di Maria with...." made zero sense.he used to work his bollocks off in his younger years. It was 07 onwards where his ego grew and he became concerned about his attacking game and didn't want to track back as much. Of course I know Di Maria is more of a midfielder, but in a pure winger sense only one winner..
Which is basically my point. All those things you talk about, they're just what a better dribbler does. His intelligence and close control in tight spaces is just different. Ronaldo has other benefits but in hindsight, like I said, maybe he wasn't the top dribbler we thought he was.Iniesta has better close control, but he also has that thing which he picks and chooses his dribbles more carefully, therefore it is harder to pick up when he is going to go past you and that makes it hard to defend against him. Di Maria has more agility than Ronaldo and has a very unique dribbling technique, he's more natural at jinking in and out of tight spots.. so I agree he is a better dribbler especially against top defenders..
None of the players I mention do that. Iniesta is a midfield playmaker and Di Maria does a greater deal of his good work in the buildup than Ronaldo did. I'm sorry but Ronaldo simply doesn't have a case for "being the guy who conducts from deep" more than these other players. Quite the opposite.
Good thing I wasn't comparing them as wingers. I was saying that Ronaldo didn't chase and harry the way Di Maria does. He never did and doesnt now either. He worked harder as a kid but he was still very individualistic and it was nowhere comparable to what Di Maria showed last year, for example. It's not his nature to be chasing and being a pain for attackers. Which is not a criticism because hes always been so good going forward. I was just highlighting how you saying Ronaldo was "basically Di Maria with...." made zero sense.
Which is basically my point. All those things you talk about, they're just what a better dribbler does. His intelligence and close control in tight spaces is just different. Ronaldo has other benefits but in hindsight, like I said, maybe he wasn't the top dribbler we thought he was.