What i'm saying is the way he did it wasn't nearly as meaningful for us as the record itself would suggest. In the biggest game in the group he was subpar, even though he scored, because the goal was meaningless. It's an impressive record in and of itself, but it's not that impressive in the context it was achieved. Scoring 10 huge goals in 5 games between QF and Final?
That's impressive. I don't really rate his goalscoring exploits in '14 either, by themselves -i do rate his huge impact on the games, including the final, for which he was even unjustly criticized and mocked for the way he celebrated his goal, when he played injured and still had a good game and did a lot of things that helped us win. Bale's goal was started by him tracking back to the edge of our own box in the second extra time to win the ball back and start the counter. He never got enough credit for that game imho, he was a leader throughout, along with Ramos. (He also set up two of our 3 biggest chances in regulation, Bale fecked up both)
That's my point about stats: what is better, a player who scores 10 goals, all the 1-0, in 10 different games, or a player who scores 10 goals in 10 games, but only scores in 4 of those games and 4 of those 10 goals are meaningless?
If i had to give a vote to his season overall, so far, it would be a 5.5 -not a disaster in of itself, but still below par(6)-. What makes it worse is that we rely on him too much for that -we need him to be at least a 7- and he's failed in that regard,
so far. And if it were any other great player, my judgement would be the same.
The point about Salenko flew over your head it seems...
PS at this point i'm not even really talking about cristiano anymore, just using him as an example