bakalhau
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2019
- Messages
- 816
We need him gone now. He’ll always be a legend at United but tonight showed that our future can’t he with him skulking around the place anymore.
noWe need him gone now. He’ll always be a legend at United but tonight showed that our future can’t he with him skulking around the place anymore.
Yes! I’m surprised this didn’t get much attention. He pretty much called him out.It was quite telling how ETH in the post match interview mentioned how he wanted forwards to press and that "some players feel like they can't do that because they need to conserve energy for attacking, but a modern forward needs to do both".. or something to that effect.
Very good player with a very, very good record but never a legend, not for me.
He ruined that with his slave comments then and his attitude now.
We need him gone now. He’ll always be a legend at United but tonight showed that our future can’t he with him skulking around the place anymore.
His literal quote was that he agreed with the president of FIFA. Ergo he agreed with that quote. It’s the exact same as saying it himself.He never uttered the words. It was Blatter
It's literally not the same as saying it himselfHis literal quote was that he agreed with the president of FIFA. Ergo he agreed with that quote. It’s the exact same as saying it himself.
If you say you agree with a quote, then you might as well have said it. He didn’t say “bit harsh that, of course I’m not a slave” he said ‘yes he is correct’It's literally not the same as saying it himself
Literally, no.It's literally not the same as saying it himself
Dude, hate him for any other reason even his haircut or how about his rape case.If you say you agree with a quote, then you might as well have said it. He didn’t say “bit harsh that, of course I’m not a slave” he said ‘yes he is correct’
Don’t worry, that’s by far the biggest reason I hate the scumbag.Dude, hate him for any other reason even his haircut or how about his rape case.
But please don't go full --- with the blatter comments. He didn't say the words that keep getting used as an example. Which I think is hilarious considering there are so many other legitimate things to be annoyed about
Literally, no.
Effectively, yes. 100%
If I say "I like the colour blue" and someone says "I agree", it is effectively saying they like the colour blue.
If someone says "I think we should murder all the babies in the world" and someone says "I agree", it is effectively saying they think that we should murder all the babies in the world.
So, not literally, no. But effectively, yes. The end result and implications of agreement are - literally - the same.
Don’t worry, that’s by far the biggest reason I hate the scumbag.
He needs to translate that determination into willing buyers ffs
for 500k a week ?If he's willing to be a team player and sit on the bench more often than not then fine, no problem if he stays. If he's at all being disruptive hopefully Ten Hag pushes for his exit. We'll see
He never uttered the words. It was Blatter
Blanking Carragher was brilliant though.
I can only imagine how much you have to pretend to like your mother-in-law if liking one of our football legends was this big of an askSo happy I don't have to pretend to like him anymore. Should've joined city. Hope he F's off even if no replacement is brought in, addition by subtraction considering what a diva and distraction he's been.
He needs to translate that determination into willing buyers ffs
Utd Legend without a doubt, you're being silly if you think otherwise.
His return was a great potential romantic story, and I've enjoyed watching him back in a Utd shirt, scoring goals.
But it's best for all if he go's now, the club has a new manager and direction, and it won't serve either the club or the player to have the Ronaldo show go on any longer.
Utd Legend without a doubt, you're being silly if you think otherwise.
His return was a great potential romantic story, and I've enjoyed watching him back in a Utd shirt, scoring goals.
But it's best for all if he go's now, the club has a new manager and direction, and it won't serve either the club or the player to have the Ronaldo show go on any longer.
This knucklehead is punching windows in his house right now
Nothing surprising in that, as you pointed out. United just beat Liverpool after benching the diva - a pretty big difference between this and losing by 4 in the same fixture last season, when we decided to play through Ronaldo.
So that definitely didn't happenI also think is a bad decision. It removes any remote threat of a goal so Liverpool will concentrate just on the offensive although at the same time a defeat is expected even with Ronaldo playing as a starter. If the game is still even by the second time then he could be useful coming from the bench but if United is already losing by 3 goals then there would be no point in him coming in.